Official Lance Armstrong Thread **READ POST #1 BEFORE POSTING**

Page 256 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Status
Not open for further replies.
May 7, 2009
1,282
0
0
Damiano Machiavelli said:
Not a chance. If he switched then he would not get free or discounted bikes from Trek anymore. There is a definite case of a toolbag getting paid off to promote the Lace agenda.

I don’t follow the Fat Cyclist regularly at all, but did read his Leadville write-up this year and remember that he received a free Specialized 29er hard-tail for breaking 9 hours.

Also, he has been asked at times and repeatedly denies being paid to promote any of the stuff he writes about on his website. In absence of any proof to the contrary, I’ll give him (FC, not LA) the benefit of the doubt.

But, yeah, not really relevant. The “cute” factor aside, does anyone really think an 8-year-old boy with stars in his eyes- or his father, for that matter- is a good source of unbiased information?
 
May 23, 2011
977
0
0
Deagol said:
I don’t follow the Fat Cyclist regularly at all, but did read his Leadville write-up this year and remember that he received a free Specialized 29er hard-tail for breaking 9 hours.

Also, he has been asked at times and repeatedly denies being paid to promote any of the stuff he writes about on his website. In absence of any proof to the contrary, I’ll give him (FC, not LA) the benefit of the doubt.

He was going on about his Trek that was either free or a sweetheart deal from the company itself.
 
Nov 20, 2010
786
0
0
MacRoadie said:
Having Polish and Cobblestoned on your ignore list is like driving by an accident on the freeway: you don't want to look, but the curiosity and potential spectacle is so strong.

It must be why people used to pay money to visit those old carnival side shows. You know, the ones with bearded ladies, and dog-faced boys.

Don't miss him, Polish, now that he's on my ignore list. Once you've seen one accident, it's not worth stopping. Now the the coming Lance, Thom, Johan train wreck--that's another story. ;)
 
May 7, 2009
1,282
0
0
Damiano Machiavelli said:
He was going on about his Trek that was either free or a sweetheart deal from the company itself.

I knew he had this "thing" with Livestrong, so was suprised to see he got a free Specialized.

Do you think he really is getting paid to promote them... I guess if you consider getting a free bike as a form of getting paid, then yes.

The stuff I read was in the comments section and they were for energy bars or something. He denied getting paid for the favorable mentions, but even if true, he seems to have a pretty good thing going, free bikes and all.

I don't know a ton about the Fat Cyclist and only read the blog for the 1st time a couple of weeks ago (and not since). The Livestrong alliance does not set well with me, but I only know a very small part of the story. I did read that his first wife died of cancer, so I can certainly understand his initial motivation.

Ironically, reading his Leadville report added to other things I've heard that are turning me off of that race, but I digress ......

Back to Lance.
 
luckyboy said:
Well Brajkovic and Kloden would be useful Schleck domestiques.

Yes, they would be, in a vacuum of talent at Leopard-Trek.

Keep in mind, though, that Kloeden will be 37 before the start of next year's Tour, and I'm not too sure they don't have their own version of Brajkovic, without the Brajkovic baggage (it seems you have to throw him a leadership role in a few races every year).
 
Dec 31, 2010
47
0
0
I was also inferring Levi might not want a reduced role with the Schlecks regardless of the money. he's too old to waste time as a domestique when he can clearly still win races
 
Trailzz said:
I was also inferring Levi might not want a reduced role with the Schlecks regardless of the money. he's too old to waste time as a domestique when he can clearly still win races

Which also supports my suggestion that the "merger" makes no sense. If the most successful rider for RadioShack in 2011 will be reduced to second-class citizenry at Leopard-Trek, and Leopard already has a very strong roll of supporting riders, then the only thing of any value to them is the RadioShack sponsorship.

I'd be surprised if more than a handful of RadioShack riders at best are invited to come over to the new proposed team. Especially with the influence the Schleck brothers have.
 
Dec 31, 2010
47
0
0
MacRoadie said:
Which also supports my suggestion that the "merger" makes no sense. If the most successful rider for RadioShack in 2011 will be reduced to second-class citizenry at Leopard-Trek, and Leopard already has a very strong roll of supporting riders, then the only thing of any value to them is the RadioShack sponsorship.

I'd be surprised if more than a handful of RadioShack riders at best are invited to come over to the new proposed team. Especially with the influence the Schleck brothers have.

I agree. There is also the notion (whether correct or not) that Bruyneel's organization may be an upgrade as far as leading the Schlecks to a tour victory.
 
MacRoadie said:
Which also supports my suggestion that the "merger" makes no sense. If the most successful rider for RadioShack in 2011 will be reduced to second-class citizenry at Leopard-Trek, and Leopard already has a very strong roll of supporting riders, then the only thing of any value to them is the RadioShack sponsorship.

I'd be surprised if more than a handful of RadioShack riders at best are invited to come over to the new proposed team. Especially with the influence the Schleck brothers have.

Seems to that anybody with grand tour aspirations of any kind should stay as far away from the Schlecks as they can.
 
Jul 17, 2009
4,316
2
0
MacRoadie said:
Which also supports my suggestion that the "merger" makes no sense. If the most successful rider for RadioShack in 2011 will be reduced to second-class citizenry at Leopard-Trek, and Leopard already has a very strong roll of supporting riders, then the only thing of any value to them is the RadioShack sponsorship.

I'd be surprised if more than a handful of RadioShack riders at best are invited to come over to the new proposed team. Especially with the influence the Schleck brothers have.


I thought the same thing.

But lets keep our eyes on Axel Merckx, he seems to have great interest in the young neo's on shack late now in the season. perhaps he is looking out for them until....
 
Sep 5, 2009
1,239
0
0
Cobblestoned said:
You're welcome.
Clinic-crew and mods can imply anything to a Lance-thread.

It is forbidden to insult athletes or people of public life on these grounds, isn't it ?
I think you are implying that Lance is a psychopath, which is an insult.
So I'll report you now. :D

The person has an antisocial personality disorder which can be on a scale between a sociopath and a psychopath.

See how may boxes you can tick.

not learning from experience
no sense of responsibility
inability to form meaningful relationships
inability to control impulses
lack of moral sense
chronically antisocial behavior
no change in behavior after punishment
emotional immaturity
lack of guilt
self-centeredness

People with this disorder may exhibit criminal behavior.

They do not consider other people's wishes, welfare or
rights.

They can be manipulative and may lie to gain personal
pleasure or profit.

They may default on loans, fail to provide child
support, or fail to care for their dependents adequately.

High risk sexual behavior and substance abuse are common.

Impulsiveness, failure to plan ahead, aggressiveness, irritability, irresponsibility, and a reckless disregard for their own safety and the safety of others are traits of the antisocial personality.
 
Velodude said:
The person has an antisocial personality disorder which can be on a scale between a sociopath and a psychopath.

See how may boxes you can tick.

I'd refer you to the "Is Lance Armstrong a Psychopath?" thread. That boring topic has already been overdiscussed in endless speculative detail.
 
May 26, 2010
28,143
5
0
MarkvW said:
I'd refer you to the "Is Lance Armstrong a Psychopath?" thread. That boring topic has already been overdiscussed in endless speculative detail.

that interesting diagnosis of a seriously flawed character has already been given umpteen solid examples in the "Is Lance Armstrong a Psychopath?" thread. ;)
 

Polish

BANNED
Mar 11, 2009
3,853
1
0
MarkvW said:
I'd refer you to the "Is Lance Armstrong a Psychopath?" thread. That boring topic has already been overdiscussed in endless speculative detail.

MarkvW please stop.
You are disrupting the flow of this important topic/thread.
You might offend the delicate sensibilities of those who dislike Lance so.
Waa.
 
Mar 17, 2009
2,295
0
0
MarkvW said:
I'd refer you to the "Is Lance Armstrong a Psychopath?" thread. That boring topic has already been overdiscussed in endless speculative detail.

Benotti69 said:
that interesting diagnosis of a seriously flawed character has already been given umpteen solid examples in the "Is Lance Armstrong a Psychopath?" thread. ;)

oh please, it's been discussed by a bunch of google psychologists.
 
Feb 4, 2010
547
0
0
BullsFan22 said:
I am impressed at the longevity of this thread. Didn't think it would last this long.

Thank Dog it has! It's been endlessly fascinating and entertaining. Who would think one bike racer could inspire such long lived attention?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.