FoxxyBrown1111 said:
Sure, sure. The same argument that Armstrong has. He was so good that he beat the drug cheaters clean. Good for Redgrave he had some real drugged competitors from the east. That make his wins even more impressive.
BTW, Armstrong told Liggett (in the sport for 30+ years) eye-to-eye he never doped.
I am relived now.
Right, so tell me - what's your experience of GB Rowing? Hmm? Ever been on a GB training camp, ever seen any of their physiological results, ever helped team members (like Redgrave) scrape enough money together between Games to enable them to train properly? Ever actually raced them in competition?
You lot have no idea what you are talking about. None at all. You have no insight into GB Rowing, yet you are quite happy to s*** on our team. I never saw you down at Leander on cold winters mornings yet you somehow know something I didn't see in 20 years in and around elite rowing, nor did I ever even hear rumours about.
Nothing that Redgrave or Pinsent or any of the squad did was out of the norm (ie drug-tainted). They were exceptional athletes right from the start of their careers (Pinsent was beating my scores when he was still at Eton). You name one single performance for which there is any suspicion and I'll put you right on it...
Any performance. Name one.