Nice one, but I reckon only a few of us "locals" know what you mean.Mambo95 said:Wiggins was competing for first place overall, not second like those two teams.
Nice one, but I reckon only a few of us "locals" know what you mean.Mambo95 said:Wiggins was competing for first place overall, not second like those two teams.
Mambo95 said:Wiggins was competing for first place overall, not second like those two teams.
pastronef said:yes, he should have asked the time keepers before crossing the line to let Westra win![]()
Great, more nationalistic malarkey. Just what we needed.Froome19 said:A) Thats not necessarily true the red roses can still win now (somehow)
B) Pride is the most important thing and losing to France (and in France) is much worse than just losing in France.
The Sheep said:You think Wiggins reads the forum in case I have any requests?![]()
hrotha said:Great, more nationalistic malarkey. Just what we needed.
Poursuivant said:Interesting that. Do any cyclists read this forum? Their must be some who are curious.
Poursuivant said:Interesting that. Do any cyclists read this forum? Their must be some who are curious.
spalco said:Didn't Landis say something like "the only thing worse than reading cyclingnews is talking with them"?
I suppose I would read forums like this if I were a pro, but posting non-anonymously is probably a mistake.
Indeed. Get out while you still canKwibus said:If I was a pro I would avoid this place like hell![]()
King Of The Wolds said:Richie Porte does, or at least did. He called it an evil place.
Libertine Seguros said:To be fair to Porte, I think he just said that some hurtful things are said on these forums, and the interviewer said it was an evil place, which Porte laughed at in sort of noncommittal agreement.
Frankly, it goes both ways. Porte was initially extremely overrated based on his initial breakthrough, then the backlash came and went too far in the opposite direction; his talent level, as with most people, lay somewhere between the levels suggested by the initial hype and the resultant backlash.
Moviefan1203 said:Great win for Brad, he earned it. Well done man! Always good to see English speaking riders win big races.![]()
Sciatic said:You're not going to restart this whole Anglo thing again are you. Besides, I don't get why rooting for a rider from another country just because they speak the same language!? We don't talk with these guys in the peloton, we watch them. So it's what I see someone doing on their bike that leads me to root/not root for them. Makes more sense to me to root for someone because of their kit design than because of the language they speak!
Moviefan1203 said:Great win for Brad, he earned it. Well done man! Always good to see English speaking riders win big races.![]()
ferryman said:[/B]Eh. WTF goodness or difference does that make to a bike raceum.
Moviefan1203 said:I'm not intentionally starting any debate, but I believe it's good for cycling as a whole when English speaking cyclists win races like Paris-Nice. And yes, I tend to root for English speaking cyclists because I can identify with them.
Libertine Seguros said:Why would cycling as a whole benefit more from an English-speaking rider winning than any other?
Moviefan1203 said:Money.
Ten character rule, I apologize.