The GFS forecast is absolutely terrible predicting the worst PR in many years:
![]()
Total rainfall in the area before and during the race is calculated to be 40-70 mm (and temperature 9-10 degrees). Carnage. However, the strongest rain band will be concentrated mostly in north-western France so a slight variation of the weather system trajectory may significantly reduce the actual rainfall.
Because if the cobbles are underwater, the fields would be dry?..I have an idea: if there are sections of cobbles underwater, set the course to go straight through the fields to bypass those sections. It'll be a 250 km race that combines pavé, normal roads and cross.
![]()
Don't know if that's the crash, but the muddy rider is Senne Leysen.You might as well go lie down in the mud, just to get a real feel about what it's like.
![]()
I'm guessing this was the crash that caused Riesebeek to be unable to start.
Honest question, will the weather protocol combined with the parcours see any changes?
Its like swimming in a cold sea. Just dip your whole body in right away and get it over withYou might as well go lie down in the mud, just to get a real feel about what it's like.
![]()
I'm guessing this was the crash that caused Riesebeek to be unable to start.
In the past, when it rained, the race was always held (even before helmets were manditory). I thus think some perspective is needed. Cycling is inherently dangerous and it will always be that way. In fact, the sport would probably never be re-invented today with the West's obssesion over safety concerns, which have touched upon nearly every aspect of life and become a main legislative focus with a good impetus from the business of litigation. As there's always profit to be made from one's misfortune and there's always someone else or somthing to blame because "saftey" protocals were neglected.
Sure it's obligatory that road furniture is well-indicated, buffered or padded that race officials on motorcycles stay out of the racers' way that dangerous curves are well-marked, etc. to provide the most favorable conditions for rider safety. But ultimately it's the riders themselves who are accountable for how they race and when it rains one simply must ride with greater prudence. That's the solution, not cancelling the event. Weather protocal cancellations should be applied only in most severe cases of tempests or snow storms and only with great moderation.
I don't know. Hopefully the course will be unaffected.
In the past, when it rained, the race was always held (even before helmets were manditory). I thus think some perspective is needed. Cycling is inherently dangerous and it will always be that way. In fact, the sport would probably never be re-invented today with the West's obssesion over safety concerns, which have touched upon nearly every aspect of life and become a main legislative focus with a good impetus from the business of litigation. As there's always profit to be made from one's misfortune and there's always someone else or somthing to blame because "saftey" protocals were neglected.
Sure it's obligatory that road furniture is well-indicated, buffered or padded that race officials on motorcycles stay out of the racers' way that dangerous curves are well-marked, etc. to provide the most favorable conditions for rider safety. But ultimately it's the riders themselves who are accountable for how they race and when it rains one simply must ride with greater prudence. That's the solution, not cancelling the event. Weather protocal cancellations should be applied only in most severe cases of tempests or snow storms and only with great moderation.
I'm excited by the prospect of a wet Roubaix but I'm also dreading it.
Just hoping for none of the big favorites to miss out because of mechanicals or crashes but that's probably wishful thinking.
Not really comparable to Formula 1. The problem in Formula 1 is that a couple of years ago the cars got wider and faster, and also the tyres got way wider. This causes a lot more spray than before when the road is wet. Combine this with the drivers sitting lower to the ground nowadays it's impossible for the drivers to see anything anymore.Good post.
The same conversations happen in Formula 1 now as well, i.e. where wet weather races are cancelled due to safety concerns... when the drivers in the old days had a perfect solution: drive slower.
Based on the women's race conditions don't seem too bad. More rain predicted overnight though.
Keep in mind the espoirs were crashing every two minutes at the Worlds and then the elite race wasn't defined by crashes at all - experience matters and the women had basically zero. Of course, this is a difficult time for the men to be having a wet Roubaix with lots of debutants due to the last edition being 2.5 years ago and it being the first wet Roubaix for the entire peloton, but it isn't inherently more dangerous than all the previous wet editions and generally I'd expect the men's peloton to hold up better than the women's due to the difference in experience anyway. Of course there will be crashes but that's normal for Roubaix.Rain front expected to hit after the women finish. Tomorrow will be far more treacherous than today. What i saw today, tomorrow will be absolute carnage. This isn't an issue of experience of the women, it's just real dangerous.
I expect mass tumbles for the men as well, if you shoot off the crown you have a decent chance to crash and everyone behind is in trouble as well.
Keep in mind the espoirs were crashing every two minutes at the Worlds and then the elite race wasn't defined by crashes at all - experience matters and the women had basically zero. Of course, this is a difficult time for the men to be having a wet Roubaix with lots of debutants due to the last edition being 2.5 years ago and it being the first wet Roubaix for the entire peloton, but it isn't inherently more dangerous than all the previous wet editions and generally I'd expect the men's peloton to hold up better than the women's due to the difference in experience anyway. Of course there will be crashes but that's normal for Roubaix.
No. It might be a good idea to ride them carefully with some space to the rider in front of you.might be a good idea to remove the muddiest sector