Phil and Paul

Page 39 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
May 11, 2009
1,301
0
0
Have you noticed commentators wear earphones? They get constant instructions on what to say, when to break, when to switch to another commentaor. They are also speaking to the average viewer who knows very little about bike racing.

Armstrong could have been a hero today if he had invested his money in the cycling channel akin to the tennis channel.
 
Jul 5, 2011
858
0
0
avanti said:
Have you noticed commentators wear earphones? They get constant instructions on what to say, when to break, when to switch to another commentaor. They are also speaking to the average viewer who knows very little about bike racing.

Armstrong could have been a hero today if he had invested his money in the cycling channel akin to the tennis channel.

Whoever is giving the instructions must be working for Eurosport. The 'average viewer' must be very confused if they listen to P&P for too long. In fact they listen to race radio on their headphones, information re gaps, mechanicals, retirements etc.
 
Jul 17, 2009
4,316
2
0
avanti said:
Have you noticed commentators wear earphones? They get constant instructions on what to say, when to break, when to switch to another commentaor. They are also speaking to the average viewer who knows very little about bike racing.

Armstrong could have been a hero today if he had invested his money in the cycling channel akin to the tennis channel.

Interesting point on the cycling chanel.

I have never understood why one is compelled to dumb down the sport for average viewers.

It's like changing the rules of the game almost. its insulting to the average viewer and the sport IMHO
 
Aug 16, 2011
10,819
2
0
Boeing said:
Interesting point on the cycling chanel.

I have never understood why one is compelled to dumb down the sport for average viewers.

It's like changing the rules of the game almost. its insulting to the average viewer and the sport IMHO

That's just the kind of commentators they are. Their commentators for the average American that know close to nothing about cycling. But for the population that does know about cycling, they come off as repetitive and tedious most of the time.
 
May 11, 2009
1,301
0
0
Afrank said:
.............Their commentators for the average American that know close to nothing about cycling. ..............

That is what most networks demand of their commentators. I find it true in not only cycling but also in tennis and skiing.

I knew an Olympian who commentated for ESPN some years ago. He was told to dumb down his commentary. Plus he said there were people continually telling him how many seconds to speak, when to refer to ads, when to speak or not speak, etc. He quit because commentating was a pain.
 
May 11, 2009
1,301
0
0
Yesterday Phil said that the yellow lines are "like ice in the rain". I can't speak for the Vail area but in my area of Colorado the white and yellow lines are not slippery being a mixture of paint and glass beads.
 
Aug 7, 2010
404
0
0
avanti said:
Yesterday Phil said that the yellow lines are "like ice in the rain". I can't speak for the Vail area but in my area of Colorado the white and yellow lines are not slippery being a mixture of paint and glass beads.

I went down hard in a light mist in Megeve, France when I overcooked a turn and hit the paint --- slick as cat-pewp on linoleum. :eek:

Of course that was 1992 and maybe they've switched to a grittier mix since.
 
Jul 17, 2009
4,316
2
0
Afrank said:
That's just the kind of commentators they are. Their commentators for the average American that know close to nothing about cycling. But for the population that does know about cycling, they come off as repetitive and tedious most of the time.

So in essence these suits behind the broadcasting believe that people wont pay attention to the game itself with out added stimulation.

This alone is a topic worthy of discussion. broadcasting and networt TV 101 in the US on the major stations is all a means to keep the viewer on the Chanel into and out of a commercial break. Just as the short advert is typically off the hook outrageous...

The increased “dumbing down”
of sports announcing mirrors
the approach on many of the
commercials that accompany
sporting events.

From an interesting read on network tv sports broadcasting in general

http://www.tvquarterly.tv/tvq_37_3/media/articles/37.3_Dumbing_Down.pdf

And I thought the game was fun and the fun is the game. my bad


the evolution of these two nobs now is they believe they are the show right? especially Paul

more and more they even tease with information they will get back to after the break only to forget about it
 
Have been watching the Vuelta highlights on the ITV website, all the usual Phil gems including today: "Samuel Sanchez, the Olympic champion... former". Gary Imlach good as ever tho.
 
Mar 13, 2009
5,245
2
0
As it seems Jens Voigt was co-commentator for one (or a few?) Vuelta stages on the channel iTV. Is this Phil and Paul's channel?

Was Jens any good? I would be very interested in some reviews, if anyone saw it. Thanks!

Although it's a bit ridiculous from Jens in my opinion. It's maybe a bit harsh but I think you can either be a rider or a commentator, but not both. But Jens is already laying the ground work for next year I guess.

BUNZ8kNIQAAq2kT.jpg
 
Christian said:
As it seems Jens Voigt was co-commentator for one (or a few?) Vuelta stages on the channel iTV. Is this Phil and Paul's channel?

Was Jens any good? I would be very interested in some reviews, if anyone saw it. Thanks!

Although it's a bit ridiculous from Jens in my opinion. It's maybe a bit harsh but I think you can either be a rider or a commentator, but not both. But Jens is already laying the ground work for next year I guess.

BUNZ8kNIQAAq2kT.jpg

ITV is a major Uk network that seeks out a monopoly on reality tv, celebrity, game shows and all the other tabloid crap. Even their " award winning" cough, news programmes focus on celebrity when possible.

The Vuelta of course was on one of their many secondary channels, (Itv 4 to be precise) and not the whole thing but just highlights.

Now, Jens and Phil, actually were quite good. Its difficult to talk about them together though, as its different situations.

Ligget is of course scum. A proven liar and fraud who only survived the Lance scandal with his job because of the importance of celebrity in a sport as desperate for attention as cycling in the anglophone world.

Whatsmore he knows next to nothing about cycling anymore, not a hope in hell of identifying even the best classics riders, or any riders that aren't anglophone really.
For example even Tiralongo, a guy who has top 10'd gts, won a mountain stage and dropped the entire Giro field on a hill stage as well as proven himself a key mountain domestique in gt wins, Phil Ligget said on the Angliru stage that Tiralongo proved he can climb a little by holding the mountains classification at the "Santos Tour Down Under".

Still in this Vuelta it was a relief to hear him on the highlights because the real time commentator here in the UK was the most unqualified person in the history of sports announcement, carlton kirby.

But Ligget was also good because he realized the audience was small for once he was focusing on the cyclists racing and the race rather than trying to heroworship Lance and other anglophones as much as possible or to promote the Tours of California and Australia.

Now what you really wanted to hear about- Jens. I went into it thinking I wouldnt like Jens so much because i felt he was lucky to get away with those missed samples and also because he defended Lance. Also snips to interviews, funny as they sometimes may be, wouldnt neccesarily be the same thing as talking for lenghty periods of time on tv.
I thought he would maybe fly in from Germany say yes to all the questions and take the paycheck for offering his star power.

But Ill be honest Jens was really good. Apart from the bit where he had to defend Horner's performance, where he just kept repeating that Horner did well in the Tour of Utah. In that sense he is a bit like Sean Kelly and Magnus Backsted.

Sean if you ever listened to Brit Eurosport, also has to take the Omerta stance on any doping issue (due to his past) but other than that is an expert commentator.

Jens was exactly like that. He knew his stuff, the answers he gave to questions werent bs, he was opinionated (said he didn't like to see Elisonde cry because -"come on its just a bike race") and noticed stuff others didn't (like a crash in the corrner of the screen). Also occasionally funny. Not roll on the floor funny, but still.

Hes a solid commentator, and given how poor the quality of commentators is in the UK, one of the better ones.

But you can watch the whole thing through the ITV website anyway. If they dont allow you due to some geo nonesence, i hear some website called tunnelbear helps.
 
Mar 13, 2009
5,245
2
0
Thanks for the long review Hitch, I really appreciate it! I expressed concern a couple of weeks ago in another thread, that Jens Voigt has turned into a parody of himself. The fact that he did this thing with Liggett aggravated my suspicions. But from what you say it sounds like he wasn't promoting his Jens Voigt (TM) image too hard, and actually contributed things that were worthwile. Cheers to him!
 
Christian said:
Thanks for the long review Hitch, I really appreciate it! I expressed concern a couple of weeks ago in another thread, that Jens Voigt has turned into a parody of himself. The fact that he did this thing with Liggett aggravated my suspicions. But from what you say it sounds like he wasn't promoting his Jens Voigt (TM) image too hard, and actually contributed things that were worthwile. Cheers to him!

Nah if anything it was ITV that tried to make it about Voigt. They tried to push the Shut up legs comment in, they kept asking him about age with regards to Horner since they are the same age. Voigt himself just talked about the race and other races.
 
The Hitch said:
I
Sean if you ever listened to Brit Eurosport, also has to take the Omerta stance on any doping issue (due to his past) but other than that is an expert commentator.

There can be some deadpan humour on occasion. I'll always be entertained by the Cunego exchange:

Lead commentator: Blah blah, Damiano Cunego, blah blah, won the Giro, blah blah, not a GC factor anymore, blah blah... why Sean?
S. Kelly: It was a different era of cycling.
Lead commentator: Blah blah, no, but really, why?
S. Kelly: [Pause]... It was a different era of cycling.
 
May 23, 2010
516
0
0
Listening to these two clowns on L-B-L comms.

I just feel like they should go away.

After all those years as the forward press for the Omerta and the LA juggernaut I feel like they must have known what was going on and that as such they played a part in framing the Armstrong story in that thickly coated cancer shield of impenetrable bull****.

Its because of this that every time I hear them on commentary or see them interviewed post-confession I just think that they are more than the simple irrelevance that they once were and that they should just go away.

In other words, 'Bridge to engine room, more credibility! But there is no more credibility'.
 
Aug 16, 2011
10,819
2
0
Wouldn't surprise me if a significant part of their income came from Armstrong paying them to be his personal cheerleaders. :p

I agree, they should have retired a long time ago.
 
I just watched the end of the first stage of the ToC. Why is it cycling continues to countenance Phil Liggett a renowned Armstrong apologist and fanboy to announce races. In addition they are using Christian Van de Velde as the commentator, a cyclist who eagerly participated in the doping programs of two pro teams, USPS and Once.

Do the networks, USA Cycling or the UCI not understand that the use of these types of people only perpetuates and gives some credence to the culture of doping.

Phil in his usual way miscalled the winner in spite of the fact it was a photo finish.

Cycling just doesn't seem to learn or get it with respect to cleaning out the dead and tainted wood!

PS Sorry, I couldn't find a Phil Liggett thread in the Clinic
 
Aug 16, 2011
10,819
2
0
Is it just me, or were they were going all out with the Wiggo love during the California commentary today. Thank god for mute buttons, it was unbearable.
 
Afrank said:
Is it just me, or were they were going all out with the Wiggo love during the California commentary today. Thank god for mute buttons, it was unbearable.

they were :p
I got ill listening to Paul the first day..every 5 minutes it was Bradley wiggins...or Sir Bradley Wiggins...and Sky is certainly taking this race very very seriously...
blah blah ....

not listening to them anymore
did not watch today but it must've been unbearable to the max