ultimobici said:I know money comes into it, but it is not the only consideration. Cutting costs by using problematic parts is a sure way for me, the dealer, to fall out of love with your company and steer a customer to another brand. If my current employers had issues with Sram components we couldn't afford the damage to our reputation that duff parts would entail.
Not ridden much? I live & work in London. We have approximately 75000 cyclists commuting into London every day, many as a result of the Cyclescheme tax benefit. That, coupled with the increasing popularity of sportives, has encouraged a massive increase in £1000 road bike purchases. These bikes are Sram Apex, 105 or Mirage/Xenon equipped. They're not only ridden daily, 10 to 20 miles, but also frequently aren't babied at all. The resulting issues are the same for all makes, with no anomalies. If Sram was as feeble as you assert it would be shown up in the course of a typical British winter. But it is not, far from it.
Somethings different. I'm not telling a story about the sram levers, et.all I have warrantied. In the heirarchy of road components, sram is a distant 3rd.
BUT product manager have been specing crappy stuff for years. Remember first/second gen. Gripshift? How about first gen RockShox Judy, with the plastic exploding right leg oil cylinder, Frankenstems?, Scott shocks? Mavic Zap/Mektronic(altho not cheap), Profile stems, American Classic seatposts.....long list.