The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
Pidcock and Wout have both beaten MVDP on this course, which is why I was a bit surprised that he was able to win in the manner that he did. Perhaps the muddy conditions neutralized TP's climbing advantage, while it wasn't quite the tractor pull mud that Wout would need to win if Mathieu was on a good day.Pidcock and Van Aert finding out CX aren't little TdF breakaways
fun cross. VDP still a different beast in CX when he's on form.
People often talk about the big 3, or big 2 w/o Pidcock. But there's really only the big 1.
VDP is on a staggering 90 out of 130 vs Van Aert in crosses. 66vs26 in big crosses (superprestige, world cup, x20) and 4-3 in world ch.
He is already on five wins there, i.e. all of his starts (3rd in U23 at the WC 2014).
Some interesting results from the North Americans, especially in the women's race. Honsinger did well enough on a course that should suit her. Munro was the surprise high finisher. Rochette DNFed on the first lap, apparently due to a hamstring knock suffered in pre-ride (per her IG). Kind of surprising to see 17-year old Isabella Holmgren finishing so far ahead of her twin sister Ava, since the latter is the elite Canadian women's champ.
Yeah, well, just a few days ago Van der Poel was wondering if he was going to have to chase Van Aert for the whole season, so let's not get ahead of ourselves, shall we. Van der Poel's highs are probably higher than Van Aert's, but his lows are also way lower.fun cross. VDP still a different beast in CX when he's on form.
People often talk about the big 3, or big 2 w/o Pidcock. But there's really only the big 1.
VDP is on a staggering 90 out of 130 vs Van Aert in crosses. 66vs26 in big crosses (superprestige, world cup, x20) and 4-3 in world ch.
Is this so? My impression from watching the last 4-5 years is that Van Aert is more likely to beat MVDP by a multi-minutes time gap due to the nature of the courses he excels at, while WVA has also finished more often 3rd or off the podium in the company of the non-aliens of CX.Yeah, well, just a few days ago Van der Poel was wondering if he was going to have to chase Van Aert for the whole season, so let's not get ahead of ourselves, shall we. Van der Poel's highs are probably higher than Van Aert's, but his lows are also way lower.
Van der Poel has a bigger natural talent for cx, put him on a cx bike and he can almost immediately win a race. That's different for Van Aert, that's why maybe you've seen him struggling a few times here and there when he gets back to cx. But he almost always puts up a decent fight, and almost always has a decent level. I've seen MVDP completely blow up a couple of times, can't remember seeing the same for WVA actually.Is this so? My impression from watching the last 4-5 years is that Van Aert is more likely to beat MVDP by a multi-minutes time gap due to the nature of the courses he excels at, while WVA has finished more often 3rd or off the podium in the company of the non-aliens of CX.
Both clearly head and shoulders above any other rider in the sport, including Mr. Pidcock. We're lucky to get to watch them battling in their prime.