- Mar 10, 2009
- 7,268
- 1
- 0
Ok thread is temporarily locked, so that we can all cool down and start discussing the topic again.
The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
theswordsman said:Which would be worse for their chances of being invited to the Tour - skipping the Giro or showing up with a non-competitive team?
flicker said:Sorry my 9 year old hijacked me into watching that batman flick. We had to leave as Heaths performance was way to disturbing for my son and I.
badboyberty said:yay, no radioshack at the Giro. Now if I'm watching a lo-res stream I won't have to work out whether I'm seeing a grey and red RS jersey or a red and black BMC jersey.
Steegmans must be feeling good, signed on as a sprinter for a team that won't even bother fielding a squad if they're not competing for GC. He may finish the season racing less for RS than he did for Katushka....
Carboncrank said:This is not about them not wanting to field a team there.
It's about the make up of riders they will have for the team knowing that they are sending their best riders to the Tour of Ca and whether the Giro will want them if they send their B team.
Mellow Velo said:Shouldn't the UCI look into whether a team that intends not to ride all the GTs, should be allowed to sign up half a dozen riders who specialise in riding GTs?
It comes down to this. Due to Lance's overriding obssession with the Tour, EVERYONE who is in with a chance of making the team, has to gear their training and schedule towards July. No exceptions.
As a result, The Shack refuse to release riders such as Brajkovic and Kloden, in order to give them a shot at the Giro podium.
Taking quality riders and putting them into cold storage until July, as with Lance himself, is a major factor in the ongoing dispute between the year long, ardent cycling fan and the 3 week fanboy.
pmcg76 said:Agree with this completely, RadioShack have so many good GT riders, they should be aiming for all 3 GTs instead of having them all focusing on the Tour. Sometimes I wonder if the aim of RadioShack is to see Lance win the Tour or just to try and make sure Contador doesnt win so they can say 'told you he was useless without us'
Everyone raves about how much attention Lance brings to cycling but all the attention is on one race, the Tour and his rivalry with Contador which is based around, yes the Tour. If there is one race that doesnt need any more attention its the Tour. The Tour is a money making operation so of course they want Lance for maximun profits but the race itself dont need the publicity.
I would have given Lance far more kudos if he had come back with the focus on other races outside the Tour, to try and round out his plamares, the classics which were his initial strong point when he turned pro and the other GTs. Even if he won another Tour, he still aint gonna get any closer to Merckx, Hinault or Coppi. If he and his team made the effot to be competitive outside the Tour, they would get far more respect.
Personally I dont care if they are at the Giro, just sad at the waste of talent all for one persons ego.
pmcg76 said:I would have given Lance far more kudos if he had come back with the focus on other races outside the Tour, to try and round out his plamares, the classics which were his initial strong point when he turned pro and the other GTs. Even if he won another Tour, he still aint gonna get any closer to Merckx, Hinault or Coppi. If he and his team made the effot to be competitive outside the Tour, they would get far more respect.
Personally I dont care if they are at the Giro, just sad at the waste of talent all for one persons ego.
Publicus said:+10000
He had an opportunity, but fell back into his old routine. Frankly it would have been sweet if he had gone for the Giro/Vuelta double this year (and skipped the Tour).
kurtinsc said:I do wonder what would have happened if Lance hadn't gotten injured.
It felt like he really was gearing his training toward the Giro prior to breaking his collarbone. After that, he couldn't get ready to be in race shape for the Giro.
I don't know if he would have gone all out for the Giro and assisted in the Tour, done the Giro/Vuelta double or what... but I do think he was really thinking he was going to win the Giro prior to the accident.
Mellow Velo said:Shouldn't the UCI look into whether a team that intends not to ride all the GTs, should be allowed to sign up half a dozen riders who specialise in riding GTs?
It comes down to this. Due to Lance's overriding obssession with the Tour, EVERYONE who is in with a chance of making the team, has to gear their training and schedule towards July. No exceptions.
As a result, The Shack refuse to release riders such as Brajkovic and Kloden, in order to give them a shot at the Giro podium.
Taking quality riders and putting them into cold storage until July, as with Lance himself, is a major factor in the ongoing dispute between the year long, ardent cycling fan and the 3 week fanboy.
Carboncrank said:How rediculous, "overrding obssession (sic)". That's like having an overriding obsession with the Indianapolis 500.
Alberto will be equally obsessed.
I'm glad they moved the Tour of Ca date. I may actually be able to go. I'm shooting for the San Francisco to Santa Cruz stage.
http://74.125.93.132/search?q=cache...rnia-stage-3-route-details-becoming-available
Way tougher than last year. The tour of ca keeps getting better, even with a mountain top finish now.
Publicus said:Maybe I'll run into you.
Big GMaC said:you don't drive a semi by any chance?
pmcg76 said:Even if he won another Tour, he still aint gonna get any closer to Merckx, Hinault or Coppi. If he and his team made the effot to be competitive outside the Tour, they would get far more respect.
Carboncrank said:Where were those guys at age 38?
Let me answer that for you. Out of cycling for many years.
Merxkx finished 6th in his last tour at age 32 after a light racing schedule focusing completely on the tour.
Hinault finished second at age 32, then retired.
Coppi last tour podium was a win at age 32. He wasn't competitive past 35. But that must have been all those broken bones and his treatment in those awful British POW camps right?
Who are you kidding? There's nothing Lance could do that would earn your respect. If he wins this year you'll just claim he was doping or some other lame internet crank conspiracy.
You're already setting it up. If he wins it won't matter because he didn't do enough of the classics, or because he went the the tour of CA instead of the Giro.
Carboncrank said:How rediculous, "overrding obssession (sic)". That's like having an overriding obsession with the Indianapolis 500.
Alberto will be equally obsessed.
I'm glad they moved the Tour of Ca date. I may actually be able to go. I'm shooting for the San Francisco to Santa Cruz stage.
http://74.125.93.132/search?q=cache...rnia-stage-3-route-details-becoming-available
Way tougher than last year. The tour of ca keeps getting better, even with a mountain top finish now.
Carboncrank said:How rediculous, "overrding obssession (sic)". That's like having an overriding obsession with the Indianapolis 500.
I'm glad they moved the Tour of Ca date. I may actually be able to go. I'm shooting for the San Francisco to Santa Cruz stage.
Way tougher than last year. The tour of ca keeps getting better, even with a mountain top finish now.
flicker said:I watched it at summit of Empire grade. Pretty good place to watch plus a fun ride to the intersection. If you come early you can probably ride the climb. Or there are about 5 other routes to get to the top.