hrotha said:Australia is too cool to have their team selection discussed in the main thread.
royalpig180 said:We can debate all we want over why Renshaw was excluded, but let's face it--from a purely sporting perspective, it's a ridiculously stupid decision. As someone else said, we're looking at a world's course largely expected to produce some form of a bunch sprint. Australia had the option to select the best lead out man in the world (and most consistent), and they leave him out. Could his personal aspirations upset team chemistry? Maybe, but he sure would be a major asset in the sprint, certainly more so than the likes of Haussler and debatably CJ as well.
Ferminal said:McEwen should have been the reserve instead of Renshaw too, but he wasn't on the long list was he?
swuzzlebubble said:
I think Cav has actually won Scheldeprijs 3 times but I didn't refer to it as I don't think its really a major classic that the "big guns" sufficiently care about to rip the field apart. It's also quite a bit shorter isn't it (+/- 200km)? I mentioned MSR 2009 in my original post. Anyway, straying off topic....Tuarts said:Cav has no classics form? Winning MSR and Scheldeprijs twice don't count then...
Red Ace said:Britain plans to ride all day for Cavendish, (and that includes Wiggins!!). Clearly Sky investment to get Cav will make even more sense if he is wearing the World Champs Jersey.
I am surprised that people think that Mark Renshaw will not be able in sit in a bunch all day on a flat course behind the Sky team getting ready for a bunch sprint.
Surely the best tactical rider in a bunch sprint in the pro peloton wasn’t dropped due to the distance!!!
auscyclefan94 said:http://www.sbs.com.au/cyclingcentral/news/32799/Different-approach-cited-for-Renshaw-omission
“[I was] obviously, very surprised – and very upset,” Renshaw said.
“[White] said they were going to the world championships with a different approach, not necessarily a sprint approach. And they’re not quite sure how Matt Goss is going, so… they might be going with different objectives.”
Asked if he felt it also had something to do with primarily being a lead-out man at Grand Tours, rather than one-day races, which tend to be longer, Renshaw replied: “The other reason they gave me is that they don’t trust me over that distance.
“Which, for a start, unless they take me to a world championships, how am I ever going to race over that distance? They keep not picking me, so… it’s obvious I’ll never get to prove myself in that situation
Tuarts said:You can carry the form to race 250k over a 3 year peroid?
I'll have what he's having
sublimit said:You get my point - he's proven he can ride that distance even though that was a couple years ago. And he's a stronger rider now.
just some guy said:Where is shown he is a stronger rider now ?
in anything with over 230 km with a 500 m @ 4 % uphill drag or close to it