Done.
You forgot to update the date of the updating.
The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
Done.
Fixed.You forgot to update the date of the updating.
Same here: MVDP sits at 50 wins, of which 6 are a Monument and 1 in a WC, though.
Viviani or Sam Bennet are ahead of him when it comes to # of wins, yet they don't have similar achievements.
Yeah, I'm not trying to sh*t on the thread or to say that it's completely meaningless as a milestone - I'd definitely aim at reaching 50 or 100 if I were a cyclist with 47 or 97 wins under my belt.I should think people were aware of that...
But the publicity and points will probably be enough for the team to have him do that.Demare reaching 100 victories will only depend on how many fourth tier french races he enters.
Not really,And all WT wins. If we count just WT wins, Pogacar is probably 25 WT wins ahead everybody else.
Very impressive too. If we take off this 2 slovenians, there is any active rider (please, don't count Cav) with more than 40 WT wins?Not really,
Pogacar 65 wins
Roglic 63 wins
As far as I can tell, Cavendish is at 69 WT-wins (or equivalent).Very impressive too. If we take off this 2 slovenians, there is any active rider (please, don't count Cav) with more than 40 WT wins?
Read againAs far as I can tell, Cavendish is at 69 WT-wins (or equivalent).
I don’t think so. To kind of compare everyone that’s been talked about.Very impressive too. If we take off this 2 slovenians, there is any active rider (please, don't count Cav) with more than 40 WT wins?
I'm well aware what you wrote, I just don't get why you wouldn't count Cavendish's victories.Read again
Because he is a retired rider in 10 days. Just because of that.I'm well aware what you wrote, I just don't get why you wouldn't count Cavendish's victories.
Ah, I see. Fair enough then. I just figured it was some sort of Cavendish hate 😉Because he is a retired rider in 10 days. Just because of that.
Maybe...Because he is a retired rider in 10 days. Just because of that.
I don’t think so. To kind of compare everyone that’s been talked about.
Ewan 30/63
Viviani 28/89
WVA 28/49
Evenepoel 26/59
Philipsen 25/51
MVDP 22/50
Vingegaard 22/36
Demare 19/97
Merlier 19/50
EBH 18/81
Kristoff 16/95
Groenewegen 15/74
Jakobsen 14/46
Of those only Evenepoel, and Vingegaard have the best chance. Philipsen and WVA could depending on how everything goes.
But none of them bar maybe Sam Bennett, who I forgot about, have been mentioned to reach 100 wins. I listed everyone that I’ve remembered be talked about in this thread.Froome and Sam Bennett have more than those on this list (35 and 34 respectively). Matthews slots in in fourth (if you discount Cav and the Slovenians) at 29, Alaphilippe has 27 (counting his two Worlds wins (which would also increase the two Slovenians' tally by one)), then the next not-yet-mentioned would be Quintana, Boasson Hagen and Gaviria at 23.
Wow, in another era, Roglic would be a truly dominant force. Tough luck for him. Still amazing palmares.Not really,
Pogacar 65 wins
Roglic 63 wins
He has 55 wins in Grand Tours alone.As far as I can tell, Cavendish is at 69 WT-wins (or equivalent).
But some of the wins that are currently or became WT weren’t at the time he won them.He has 55 wins in Grand Tours alone.
But none of them bar maybe Sam Bennett, who I forgot about, have been mentioned to reach 100 wins. I listed everyone that I’ve remembered be talked about in this thread.