Bustedknuckle said:
Big pile up, and trying to find the right wheels, with discs..140, 160? Lined up? rubbing rotors? Gonna be comedy central.
That old straw man must be getting pretty tired by now.
First point, if you're running disc brakes, it's much less likely you'll need to take a spare wheel to ride away from that pile up. Unless you have a puncture, your wheel being out of true matters far less than with rim brakes. You could easily ride a wheel with multiple broken spokes until your team car pulls up with a spare bike.
Second point, it may be true that mtb has not adopted a standard size disc, but there has been absolutely no incentive to do so. MTB isn't a team sport, and doesn't have pits or neutral (or team) service vehicles out on course to give up a spare. So why would you need to run the same size disc as another guy?
Once disc brakes become uci legal for road racing, they would be mad not to adopt a single size, most likely 160mm. Neutral service may as well make every wheel both disc and rim brake compatible, so you will just have the same problem that exists now with cross compatibility between campy/Shimano/SRAM 10 and 11 speed etc. Just go to 135mm rear dropout spacing at the same time
FWIW, Even with the proliferation of rotor sizes and multiple mount 'standards' I can't think of a single mainstream brake caliper released in the last 5 years or more that won't fit a normal "post mount" (originally Manitou post mount IIRC) without adapters and work correctly with a 160mm rotor. Post mounts for other ice rotors do exist, but if you're using one you'll already know.