- Jun 14, 2010
 
- 34,930
 
- 60
 
- 22,580
 
the sceptic said:There you go.
He says he chose the wrong path 10 years ago. Doesn't specify how long the path lasted and doesn't say that the path stopped 10 years ago.
the sceptic said:There you go.
He says that the mistakes was short lived, but I guess you can read that as you want.The Hitch said:He says he chose the wrong path 10 years ago. Doesn't specify how long the path lasted and doesn't say that the path stopped 10 years ago.
The Hitch said:He says he chose the wrong path 10 years ago. Doesn't specify how long the path lasted and doesn't say that the path stopped 10 years ago.
those mistakes happened more than ten years ago, and they were short-lived
The Hitch said:Avril Lavigne anyone?
No?
Ok then. Leonard Cohen.
Libertine Seguros said:Cohen! Now we're talking.
I'll throw Neil Young into the ring too.
go crazy said:Who in the world starts doping, sees the fantastic results it gives you, then decides "you know what, this isn't for me!"??? In an era when guys were getting away with it, without any worry of getting caught. So we are to believe he starts doping, then decides to stop, but then continues to improve to the point where he wins a GT? Who the hell believes that?!?! I mean, at the time when he was doping, if he just stopped, then his results and performances certainly will have plummeted. You don't go from being a doped up donkey to stopping, and continuing on your upward progression. It would have taken him years to get back to that same level as when he was doping.
pmcg76 said:Well maybe take a look at Ryder's results for 2005/06. He has virtually no results of note in 05 and 4th at Tour of Cataluyna in 06 is his best result. He also didn't finish any GTs in those two years. So when you talk about fantastic results re doping, I am assuming this relates to his MTB days only. He doesn't really have a lot to get excited about between 05-07.
His improving results would then appear logical if you believe the sport getting cleaner angle as they run concurrently. If 2012 is cleaner than say 2008 then it seems more logical that his results improve likewise. Of course if you don't believe that, then of course the whole thing is illogical.
...The Hitch said:...
Ok then. Leonard Cohen.
pmcg76 said:Well maybe take a look at Ryder's results for 2005/06. He has virtually no results of note in 05 and 4th at Tour of Cataluyna in 06 is his best result. He also didn't finish any GTs in those two years. So when you talk about fantastic results re doping, I am assuming this relates to his MTB days only. He doesn't really have a lot to get excited about between 05-07.
His improving results would then appear logical if you believe the sport getting cleaner angle as they run concurrently. If 2012 is cleaner than say 2008 then it seems more logical that his results improve likewise. Of course if you don't believe that, then of course the whole thing is illogical.
The GCW said:I'm a cyclist. I'm a fan of bike racing, a fan of Jonathan Vaughters and a fan of the Garmin race team.
Using performance enhancing drugs has been prevalent and disappointing in the past and there is a credible effort to leave that race style behind. We can not deny cycling's history.
Somehow We must enter into the future which includes increased clean racing. So far Garmin has shown cycling one way toward that future.
No single route taken toward clean racing is going to please everyone. But We must move forward.
Ryder is and has been moving forward.
Let's all do the same.
Netserk said:pmcg76 said:Well maybe take a look at Ryder's results for 2005/06. He has virtually no results of note in 05 and 4th at Tour of Cataluyna in 06 is his best result. He also didn't finish any GTs in those two years. So when you talk about fantastic results re doping, I am assuming this relates to his MTB days only. He doesn't really have a lot to get excited about between 05-07.
....
According to Ryder he was clean those years.
D-Queued said:
Does that smilie qualify as 'raised eyebrows' wrt being clean in those years?
Dave.
Master50 said:Not much to say or add except I am truly sorry to read this today and Ryder's confirmation on the report.
I still stand by his real talent just because he was so much faster than any of his peers even at 16. I really hope he stopped and I might have to believe it but since I spent so much time defending him I must also acknowledge his admission and my broken faith in his career.
Do I still believe he won the Giro clean? Yes I DO. Could I be wrong? Yes I can.
Taxus4a said:Hesjedal went to USADA to talk 10 month ago becouse he wanted.
I am still waiting for a lot of my compatriots to do the same: Rubiera, Contador, Samu,.. and in general a lot of the peloton that raced the dark era.
Samson777 said:Me, me me![]()
Also Nickelback should not be forgotten.
pmcg76 said:I don't know but clearly you are a lot closer to this story than most on here. I am just hypothesizing. Undoubtedly there is a clear lack of results in 05-06 which could be down to a number of reasons.
D-Queued said:His top 20 finish on Ventoux during the 2006 Dauphine, alongside mountain climber extraordinaire Hincapie, was a very impressive if not astounding result.
Particularly impressive in that he had been riding to support a lagging Landis (who ultimately finished 56th), until Landis released him from further support.
That performance by Floyd coming, of course, just before the non-miracle Tour later that year.
Dave.
Taxus4a said:Hesjedal went to USADA to talk 10 month ago becouse he wanted.
I am still waiting for a lot of my compatriots to do the same: Rubiera, Contador, Samu,.. and in general a lot of the peloton that raced the dark era.
the sceptic said:Never tested positive.
