purcell said:
That scenario would be a 2 min penalty to the goalie PLUS a penalty shot.
Always with penalty shot on top, or only on one-one situations?
Good to have an hockey expert here. We discussed it a little over the years at the NFL thread.
The most burning question is solved (why no obese Sumo ringer is put in as goalie).
Another one is: Why (once taking a lead) aren´t teams blocking their own goal with a goalie in the middle and two defense-men blocking the outside part of the goal. I bet no shot would get trou if the remaining three players of your team would then try to block shots simultanously by throwing their bodies into opposing shots instead of trying to check opposing players at the fence.
I guess with that tactic the high skilled Red Wings of the late 90s, 2000s would have won more than "just" 4 Stanley Cups...
Edit:
Just have heared that the rules say the refs can only judge goal scored/no-goal in replay!? If that is true, the refs blatantly blew the game, b/c it was a goal.
If the refs don´t see the goal(posts) being out of position in live action, it´s their fault and shall not be corrected with replay help.
And let´s not forget that the refs gave a goal for Team USA even tough it was illegal shoved in with the skate.
Either hockey refs are worse and more blind than soccer & football refs (something I thought is impossible), or the fix was in.
It´s a shame that well paid refs too often have major influences in game outcomes...
Conclusion: Very undeserved win for USA. Hope for pay back and Russia wins gold...