It seems the social contract that Red Rick was referring to earlier has expired between Chris Horner and Phil Gaimon.
Yesterday Gaimon posted a Youtube video that was harshly critical of Chris Horner. PG didn't go into details, but he was obviously referring to doping.
Phil was/is an outstanding climber. He also sports a "clean" tattoo that he introduced before the end of his career. I can only imagine how that went over among his competitors.
Guy glides up the mountains with absolute ease, and he continues to set record times in "retirement." But his main beef with Horner seems to be that the latter has been seen in the commentator booth. He adds that Horner still tacitly defends Armstrong by not saying anything.
Think about the fact that Gaimon is zeroing in on one rider among pretty much everyone else who was doping. Guys like Jens Voigt, Sir Bradley Wiggins, Robbie McEwen, Christian Van de Velde et al. went on to careers in the broadcast booth, but the anti-doping crusader says nothing about them. This is personal.
My point being is it continues to astound me that riders have not had a regulatory body among themselves that deal with management -- i.e. a union.
This sort of stuff would never happen in a sport with a union that has a wink-wink deal with the owners that they're taking care of the "drug problem." Of course pro athletes are going to take every advantage available to them, especially considering the amount of money involved. I think it's silly to think otherwise.
But here we have an example of the social contract going awry. No one will ever hear a pro athlete in football outing a former teammate he hates for doping. That's because they've made their fortunes and there's no need to go down that road. They have pensions and benefits and stuff.
Cyclists don't.