Tadej Pogacar and Mauro Giannetti

Page 155 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
This 👆. Some of the other comments here are missing the point entirely. Forget about the competition, some are overstating its weakness in any case. Look at Pogacar. He does not appear to suffer on the climbs. He just rides like he’s on the flat, accelerating and then sustaining the gained velocity. Who else can do that? It’s just weird. Indeed he often crosses the line looking like he’s just rode down to the shops for the paper. In fact he did just that after yesterday’s time trial when everyone else looked like their heart was going to explode. No one else does that. Even Vingegaard usually looks a bit sweaty and breathless on the big stages.
When Pantani won the 98 Giro, before winning the Tour that year, he actually had to sweat to drop an obstinate Tonkov. By contrast, Pogi has no competition and he is much better in the TT. Gianetti has engineered a monster who needs to be brought down, but all that scandalous Arab money, which is nothing else but sports washing, won't allow this fraud to be caught.
 
Tadej Pogacar achieved one of the most astonishing feats of the last ten years: a very violent sprint of 13'' at 920 watts, a minute gained in two kilometres of climbing.

translating from the italiano here:
 
  • Like
Reactions: Luthor and SHAD0W93
He does not appear to suffer on the climbs.
Again, he does not suffer here cause he has no reason to ride anywhere close to his limit. Why would he?
And the statement that he never does is simply not true, looking back at the past 2 Tours. “I am dead. I am gone.” He lost minutes to Zimmermann, Kwiatkowski, Barguil on that day. From the same group. And looked like dying on the bike.
But if you send me and Caleb Ewan up a climb, later will also be faster and not break a sweat in the process. Tells us to beat me, he never is on the limit. But tells us also nothing else really.
 
Jul 23, 2023
50
84
780
Tadej Pogacar achieved one of the most astonishing feats of the last ten years: a very violent sprint of 13'' at 920 watts, a minute gained in two kilometres of climbing.

translating from the italiano here:
What does 13'' mean? Somehow I find it hard to make sense of these numbers.
 
What does 13'' mean? Somehow I find it hard to
make sense of these numbers.
Seconds, which I don’t think is a mental stat in itself. All the sprinters do this and more. But ofc it was a strong attack, considering his weight and the altitude.

Focagno yesterday was “only” 6.1 W/kg for 35min btw.

IMG-5841.webp

Unfortunately no 2023 in the graph but just confirms myself a bit that there is no “new” Pogacar (or lets say - the improvements are at least overstated). 6.1 lies exactly on his 2021 and 2022 effort line for 35min, Vingegaard in this plot would even be a bit higher.
 
Seconds, which I don’t think is a mental stat in itself. All the sprinters do this and more. But ofc it was a strong attack, considering his weight and the altitude.

Focagno yesterday was “only” 6.1 W/kg for 35min btw.

IMG-5841.webp

Unfortunately no 2023 in the graph but just confirms myself a bit that there is no “new” Pogacar (or lets say - the improvements are at least overstated). 6.1 lies exactly on his 2021 and 2022 effort line for 35min, Vingegaard in this plot would even be a bit higher.

It has to be noted that the average elevation of Foscagno climb was over 1800 meters so much higher than all those examples. The stage was also very difficult. Those factors lowered w/kg not only for Pog but also for other guys.
 
Seconds, which I don’t think is a mental stat in itself. All the sprinters do this and more. But ofc it was a strong attack, considering his weight and the altitude.

Focagno yesterday was “only” 6.1 W/kg for 35min btw.

IMG-5841.webp

Unfortunately no 2023 in the graph but just confirms myself a bit that there is no “new” Pogacar (or lets say - the improvements are at least overstated). 6.1 lies exactly on his 2021 and 2022 effort line for 35min, Vingegaard in this plot would even be a bit higher.
I agree.

And for who thinks this is a "new pogacar", better check the last 13 min effort on tourmalet and compare with the last 13 min effort yesterday on Foscagno.
 
I agree.

And for who thinks this is a "new pogacar", better check the last 13 min effort on tourmalet and compare with the last 13 min effort yesterday on Foscagno.

It seems the performances of last 13 mins on Foscagno and Tourmalet are quite similar (in terms of w/kg). Obviously Foscagno's 1770-1780 m/h of VAM is much lower but really big for such a shallow gradient. Still, Foscagno's effort is on average almost 200 meters higher. If Pog is in form comparable to Tourmalet it's not bad - after all he beat Vingo on that day.
 
It seems the performances of last 13 mins on Foscagno and Tourmalet are quite similar (in terms of w/kg). Obviously Foscagno's 1770-1780 m/h of VAM is much lower but really big for such a shallow gradient. Still, Foscagno's effort is on average almost 200 meters higher. If Pog is in form comparable to Tourmalet it's not bad - after all he beat Vingo on that day.
The "funny" thing about that final section of Tourmalet is that according to ammattipyoraily, Vingegaard did 6.91 w/kg and Pogacar 6.74 because the draft was a significant role.

Screenshot-20240520-134550-Chrome.jpg


Yeah, Pogacar perfomance was similar with yesterday, and the climb was on a similar average altitude with Foscagno, plus the final effort.
 
The "funny" thing about that final section of Tourmalet is that according to ammattipyoraily, Vingegaard did 6.91 w/kg and Pogacar 6.74 because the draft was a significant role.

Screenshot-20240520-134550-Chrome.jpg


Yeah, Pogacar perfomance was similar with yesterday, and the climb was on a similar average altitude with Foscagno, plus the final effort.

I know that Vingo did higher w/kg due to aerodynamics but those estimates vary. I'm pretty sure I saw a difference of 0.08-0.09 w/kg in some place, not 0.17 w/kg (which seems quite a lot for 21 kph)).
 
  • Like
Reactions: Froome