• The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to @SHaines here on the forum, or use the Contact Us form to message the Community Team.

    In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.

    Thanks!

Tadej Pogacar and Mauro Giannetti

Page 157 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
On the pod the other day Friebe at least acknowledged social media was blowing up with doping talk. The reaction of supposed journalist Brian Nygaard tells you everything. He said he hadn't bothered to look at social media and when Freibe asked him if there was any talk in the press room at the Giro, Nygaard gave a flat, "no". Basically, see, hear and speak no evil.
 
Yeah, opposition was 2nd tier at Strade and again now at the Giro, he lost San Remo, didn't race Flanders, and at LBL, the strongest opposition was again missing. He may have won all of those anyway, granted. But I think we can agree that "all the time" is an exaggeration.
So Martinez is 2nd tier as well? Former GC winner of Algarve, Basque Country and Dauphiné? Beat Evenepoel twice uphill in February...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Krzysztof_O
On the pod the other day Friebe at least acknowledged social media was blowing up with doping talk. The reaction of supposed journalist Brian Nygaard tells you everything. He said he hadn't bothered to look at social media and when Freibe asked him if there was any talk in the press room at the Giro, Nygaard gave a flat, "no". Basically, see, hear and speak no evil.
They don't want to lose access to Pogacar or worse, their jobs. Very few journalists dare to ask questions. That was not only the case with Armstrong. So many got away with it. Just take a look at Indurain, Gilbert in 2011, Froome on the e-bike on the Ventoux or 41 year old Vuelta winner Horner.
 
  • Like
Reactions: noob and Red Rick
So Martinez is 2nd tier as well? Former GC winner of Algarve, Basque Country and Dauphiné? Beat Evenepoel twice uphill in February...

Thomas is an accomplished GT rider, Martinez is also a proven stage-racer and so is O'Connor. Sure, Thomas is not at his best anymore. But let's be honest: everyone except Vingo and maybe Rogla would look second tier vs Pogacar in this race.
 
Last edited:
Thomas is an accomplished GT rider, Martinez is also a proven stage-racer and so is O'Connor. Sure, Thomas is not at his best anymore. But let's be honest: everyone except Vingo and maybe Rogla would look second tier vs Pogacar in this race.
I think Vingegaards performances in the TdF need some adjustment. In 2022, he beat Pogacar thanks to the teamwork and tactical errors by Pogacar. In 2023, Pogacar had a disturbed preparation, but still dropped Vingegaard, 3 times uphill. Vingegaards time trial was brilliant, but we forget that Pogacar finished second and put more than a minute on everyone else.
Rog and REv are equally matched and no competition for those two imho. I guess they're second tier as well.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AmRacer
I think Vingegaards performances in the TdF need some adjustment. In 2022, he beat Pogacar thanks to the teamwork and tactical errors by Pogacar. In 2023, Pogacar had a disturbed preparation, but still dropped Vingegaard, 3 times uphill. Vingegaards time trial was brilliant, but we forget that Pogacar finished second and put more than a minute on everyone else.
Rog and REv are equally matched and no competition for those two imho. I guess they're second tier as well.

It's enough to look what happened when Pog or Vingegaard pushed turbo button during recent Tours (or during their other stage races): everyone was pedalling backwards. It's no different in this Giro with only one of the two mutants present. Weaker field or not: it's only a matter of the 2nd guy being 5 minutes behind vs 7 minutes behind.
 
  • Like
Reactions: noob and AmRacer
Perhaps this is too general a question for this thread, but how would a peloton in which nobody is doping look different from one in which all the top guys are doping, as is presumed here?

Or are only Vingegaard and Pog on the good stuff?
 
Perhaps this is too general a question for this thread, but how would a peloton in which nobody is doping look different from one in which all the top guys are doping, as is presumed here?

Or are only Vingegaard and Pog on the good stuff?

This is a good question. I suppose that big teams like JV and UAE have better possibilities of organizing top-end doping so the field is not equal at all. On top of that there is responding factor: one cyclist (i.e. a guy with excellent engine but average blood values) can respond better to blood doping than another (who has naturally high levels of hematocrit for example). If the second guy has only a slightly worse engine he will be worse in doping conditions but maybe slightly better if both ride paniagua (due to naturally better oxygen transport in blood).
 
This is a good question. I suppose that big teams like JV and UAE have better possibilities of organizing top-end doping so the field is not equal at all. On top of that there is responding factor: one cyclist (i.e. a guy with excellent engine but average blood values) can respond better to blood doping than another (who has naturally high levels of hematocrit for example).
MvdP says hi!
 
Perhaps this is too general a question for this thread, but how would a peloton in which nobody is doping look different from one in which all the top guys are doping, as is presumed here?

Or are only Vingegaard and Pog on the good stuff?
I don't think all the top guys are doping. There's definitely something going on with Pogacar, but I don't see any extraordinary performances with his UAE colleagues. Even Evenepoel, Roglic, MvdP and Pidcock show consistency over the years and occasional weakness. Vingegaard and WVA are more suspicious of course, but it's not as obvious as Pogacar.
 

TRENDING THREADS