• The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to @SHaines here on the forum, or use the Contact Us form to message the Community Team.

    In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.

    Thanks!

Tadej Pogacar and Mauro Giannetti

Page 226 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Giro plays the least part in this for me.

the only way its interesting to me is to find look at some patterns and from that infer how doping works these days.

To me it seems theres a base level that lasts for 2/3rds of the season amd then there is is some wild short acting *** that makes you go ballistic in target races.

To me the fact that the season to season improvement is so big suggests that is a true and tried method and they just ramped up the dosage.

But the base level being so high that he dominates most of the races is something unbelievable as well.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SHAD0W93
Is Pogi maybe a super-responder to Carbon Monoxide treatmeant ?
Certainly he is an unqiue cycling talent, but this year seems .... incredible.... somehow
From what I've read, it really would explain the effortless peaking for weeks / months at a time. If you respond to altitude you'll respond to this treatment, as it's essentially extreme and controlled altitude training ... like weight lifting for your EPO production system.
 
there is is some wild short acting *** that makes you go ballistic in target races.
Maybe but I have doubts. Wild short acting *** is in theory detectable, if not today then certainly in retrospective testing. So its a big risk. That is why oxygen vector doping became so popular - the passport is way more difficult to prove and get past the lawyers. Anyway, Visma would have a pretty good idea what Gianetti is up to hence why they were so confident - until PdB.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Salvarani
I'll jump in as I'm a chess FM :D
Magnus is not even remotely close as being dominant as Pogacar is right now.
He's clearly the best (even more so in short time controls) but the difference isn't that marked.
He's the favorite in any tournaments he enters, but it's not obvious he would easily win, it's often very close.

I would say this is comparable to how Kasparov dominated (winning by 3-4 points clear every single tournament with extremely rare occurrences), but chess nowadays with engines and modern preparation is way more levelled.

On Pogacar this is obviously absurd, but to be perfectly fair Vingegard coming back from the dead and being 2nd in the TdF is even more miraculous...
Well I am not quite a FM but (2000ish ELO) :). Anyway, sure you can liken it to Kasparov as well. The point is that they are just so much better than the rest and we know in chess there is no magical pill. Therefore, it is possible for one to be so much better than the rivals.
The thing about doping, at least for me, is that there is no smoking gun. Sky days was obvious with the TUEs. But nowadays all people can come up with is the ridiculous CO thing. I just cannot fathom that a cycling team has something that is not yet used in medicine.
On the other hand, they are all flying... :D
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cookster15
Something you have to look something up. In the Slovenian ITT, he wasn't even the best of his team. He was beaten by Penko and Groselj. What a generational talent!
1) Do you have a link and 2) How old was he?

Just tried looking up the Slovenian ITT titles - I found the below in Wiki. Is this wrong because it does not validate your claim?

And as such a young age it is wrong to draw conclusions or extrapolate.

 
  • Like
Reactions: SHAD0W93
Something you have to look something up. In the Slovenian ITT, he wasn't even the best of his team. He was beaten by Penko and Groselj. What a generational talent!
And what? This does not change that fact that he had tons of results before he joined UAE. This is subjective, but I can stomatch his results way more than donkeys getting good after age 27.
 
Jul 18, 2024
7
11
60
Visit site
Mou, is that you? You're trying to divert attention to Vingegaard and you're free to do so in another topic.
Pogacar a generational talent? Right. After he joined UAE in 2019.
1) You should work on your reading comprehension, and also not quote things selectively to try and make your point. Your fanboi-ism is raging through
2) my point is that both UAE and Visma are at levels that have simply been unseen and are not reasonable.
 
1) Do you have a link and 2) How old was he?

Just tried looking up the Slovenian ITT titles - I found the below in Wiki. Is this wrong because it does not validate your claim?

And as such a young age it is wrong to draw conclusions or extrapolate.

He finished 40-20 seconds behind the guys mentioned in 2017.

Penko was a good time trialist at this time for his age. Riding against Affini, being close to beating him, among other riders that has gone pro later.

2018 he had improved and beat them. He was one minute behind Tratnik, who won.

He was two years younger than them.
 
Maybe but I have doubts. Wild short acting *** is in theory detectable, if not today then certainly in retrospective testing. So its a big risk. That is why oxygen vector doping became so popular - the passport is way more difficult to prove and get past the lawyers. Anyway, Visma would have a pretty good idea what Gianetti is up to hence why they were so confident - until PdB.
its most likely theyre on the same stuff and just pushing amd pushing the quantity.

Also pretty likely individual response is a big factor
 
its most likely theyre on the same stuff and just pushing amd pushing the quantity.

Also pretty likely individual response is a big factor

But why did they push the quantity only this year? If it was so easy Pogacar would've killed Vingo during the two previous Tours. Maybe a better technology of "consumption" was found or there is completely new fuel X (aka porridge, according to Teddy).
 
But why did they push the quantity only this year? If it was so easy Pogacar would've killed Vingo during the two previous Tours. Maybe a better technology of "consumption" was found or there is a completely new fuel X (aka porridge, according to Teddy).
Nah, I think it's just an arms race ... they probably decided to mix in EPO microdosing with the CO therapy which masks it, and got even better results.
 
One theory, Vingegaard’s sudden rise a couple years ago coincided with some new discovery, maybe beyond what UAE had at the time. Then this year UAE/Pogacar got on it and he’s back in the lead. And they’re both pushing it to new levels progressively.

Vingegaard had a much more Froomelike development than Pogacar so he may have already had access to something greater the last couple years.

Also wondering if Kuss’s bizarre MIA season this year has anything to do with it.