• The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to @SHaines here on the forum, or use the Contact Us form to message the Community Team.

    In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.

    Thanks!

Tadej Pogacar and Mauro Giannetti

Page 230 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Jul 19, 2024
14
21
80
Visit site
By my back of the envelope calculation, Pogi would have needed aerodynamic drag and rolling resistance to be reduced by ~33 % of what it was for Pantani for that to be true.
Not just that. He beat Armstrong’s time by close to 6 min. Armstrong’s ftp pre tour was in the 500 watts region from memory his tour weight was around 73 kg so that would give around 6.85 w/kg. And he was doped to the gills. Pogacar had a 40 min effort that was about .1-.15 w/kg higher than Armstrong’s ftp/kg, done at the end of the queen stage of the tour in its second week. It’s bonkers.

On a couple of different topics. I will believe the “40 w savings” claim when i see an independent study. Till then it’s marketing spiel to persuade rich, overweight 50-yr olds to part with the better part of ten grand.

I don’t think it’s motor doping not because it’s not happening (it is) but because, as far as I know, they X-Ray the leaders’ bikes at the end of each stage.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Extinction
Not just that. He beat Armstrong’s time by close to 6 min. Armstrong’s ftp pre tour was in the 500 watts region from memory his tour weight was around 73 kg so that would give around 6.85 w/kg. And he was doped to the gills. Pogacar had a 40 min effort that was about .1-.15 w/kg higher than Armstrong’s ftp/kg, done at the end of the queen stage of the tour in its second week. It’s bonkers.

On a couple of different topics. I will believe the “40 w savings” claim when i see an independent study. Till then it’s marketing spiel to persuade rich, overweight 50-yr olds to part with the better part of ten grand.

I don’t think it’s motor doping not because it’s not happening (it is) but because, as far as I know, they X-Ray the leaders’ bikes at the end of each stage.
Idk what Armstrong's weight was but I remember him saying that he was doing 500W for 30min on Col de la Madonne pre Tour (I guess any Tour he won).
 
  • Like
Reactions: Raest
Oh Pog...


Cycling is the cleanest sport in the world?
Honestly, it likely is.

Cycling has anti-doping controls in and out of competition, surprise tests, bio passport, no-needle policy... What other sport has all of this?

It's also a sport the deals with much less money then other top sports, that don't have the same level of scrutiny and control. So if there is more money and less control, why not use PEDs if no one is looking?

I wouldn't say it's the cleanest, I'd just say it's less dirty.
 
Honestly, it likely is.

Cycling has anti-doping controls in and out of competition, surprise tests, bio passport, no-needle policy... What other sport has all of this?

It's also a sport the deals with much less money then other top sports, that don't have the same level of scrutiny and control. So if there is more money and less control, why not use PEDs if no one is looking?

I wouldn't say it's the cleanest, I'd just say it's less dirty.

So very naive


They had controls during the Armstrong years. The UCI simply did not act on positives and allowed things like backdated TUEs
 
Jul 19, 2024
14
21
80
Visit site
Idk what Armstrong's weight was but I remember him saying that he was doing 500W for 30min on Col de la Madonne pre Tour (I guess any Tour he won).
I seem to remember that Ed Coyle measured it at that value too, at UT, but the Tour value is more impressive as he would have been lighter and more tired.

Speaking about Lance, I’d like to know how he feels about Pogacar. I think him, Hincapie and Bryuneel are either laughing their a…s off or are seething with rage
 
  • Haha
Reactions: noob
Honestly, it likely is.

Cycling has anti-doping controls in and out of competition, surprise tests, bio passport, no-needle policy... What other sport has all of this?

It's also a sport the deals with much less money then other top sports, that don't have the same level of scrutiny and control. So if there is more money and less control, why not use PEDs if no one is looking?

I wouldn't say it's the cleanest, I'd just say it's less dirty.
Cycling might be cleaner than weightlifting. And that's about it.
 
Honestly, it likely is.

Cycling has anti-doping controls in and out of competition, surprise tests, bio passport, no-needle policy... What other sport has all of this?

It's also a sport the deals with much less money then other top sports, that don't have the same level of scrutiny and control. So if there is more money and less control, why not use PEDs if no one is looking?

I wouldn't say it's the cleanest, I'd just say it's less dirty.

Tbf basically all Olympic sport have in and out of competition testing and surprise tests... and a lot have bio passport now. And the Olympics have been needle free since 2016 and in turn quite a few other federations for Olympic sports have similar policies... though it does vary by nation outside of the Olympics and prep for Olympics.

Heck, back in 2007-2008 I was a junior player on an Olympic programme and I had to give my whereabouts for a 2 hour window once a week for anti-doping, and surprise testing could happen at basically any training session or game.
 
I seem to remember that Ed Coyle measured it at that value too, at UT, but the Tour value is more impressive as he would have been lighter and more tired.

Speaking about Lance, I’d like to know how he feels about Pogacar. I think him, Hincapie and Bryuneel are either laughing their a…s off or are seething with rage
He claims to like him, but secretly despises him. Anyone who can make Lance look like he pailed in comparison can not receive sincere admiration from the Texan.