u can tell he dont like him at all .
why, because he dared to criticize him for something? should he just be jacking him off like the rest of the cycling media does? i dont understand this new phenomenon where if someone is even the slightest bit critical they are labeled a hater. it's ridiculous. the point of being a journalist (and i'm using this term very loosely here wrt to Lance) is to objectively call it like you see it. wrong or right, he thought Pogacar should tone it down and stop winning so much, for his own good! he never once said Pogacar was selfish or a bad guy for wanting to win. he said what he said as advice to Pogacar, speaking from his own experience of dominating the Tour. i cant believe im defending Lance Armstrong, but i dont think he gives a *** what or how many races Pogacar wins. he knows he'll never win 7 Tours in a row anyway.