there are a lot of comments flying about people making comments only because they hate this or that person and will do anything to criticize them.
regardless of how i feel about the individual riders today, i would be saying the same thing, as i think many people here would. it's not about the individual rider. AND it's not about who fell on what day and who didn't stop. to me, there is a consideration afforded the mj, it's part and parcel of this race. if you're racing in the front and the mj is nowhere in sight, that's one thing, but if the mj is RIGHT THERE and kicking ***, and has a mechanical or fall, you don't keep racing until he's back on. you ride tempo and you sure as hec don't go on the attack. that's it.
here is a quote from a 2003 new york times article about this very topic, when the racers waited for the mj, who was la at the time, after a fall:
" But when Lance Armstrong caught his handlebars on a fan's tote bag and crashed to the pavement last month during the 15th stage of the Tour de France -- a crucial climb to the Pyrenees ski village of Luz-Ardiden -- Armstrong's rivals slowed down and waited for him to recover, forsaking the chance to leave him behind.
At the time, race fans heard much about cycling's first unwritten rule: Thou shalt not ride away from the race leader when he is on the ground, stopping to relieve himself, or at other unsporting moments. Commentators agreed after the race that all of Armstrong's closest rivals appeared to heed the rule, including Jan Ullrich, who at the time trailed Armstrong in the overall standing by a mere 15 seconds.
But by doing so, Ullrich and the others not only allowed Armstrong to catch up. They also gave him a chance to win the stage -- and arguably the Tour itself, both of which he did. Ullrich finished second, for the fifth time over all and the third time to Armstrong. "