“a diuretic that was contained in a medication” is all that we know about what Hessman is being done for. We await more info.
The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
I didn’t know that about the list of approved supplements—that’s a great idea and would love to see more countries do that.Yeah, but proving a legit contamination isn't easy, It pretty much has to be a legit one (See Rui Costa). German Nada also has a list with supplements that get tested by them, so you usually also have to Probe why you didn't stick with one of those supplements.
He isn't gonna get an USADA Style slap on the wrist If He can't prove that It actually was a tainted Supplement.
Thanks for the link! Interesting that the study quoted was from 1993 - 30 years ago.How Many Carbs? | 53x12
www.53x12.com
Ferarri, 2006, pertinent to the alleged discovery of carbohydrates post-2020.
There's a few systems out there both Country and global. Pretty much every NADA has entire sections of advice on only using supplements from approved screened batches, because the only way you're gonna prove contamination is to have the same batch tested that's stored or if as an athlete you save a batch of every supplement you take. I would think Jumbo, like Ineos have any supplements not approved, screened and batched anyway, there's simply too much risk buying ad-hoc both from team or riders pocket.I didn’t know that about the list of approved supplements—that’s a great idea and would love to see more countries do that.
“Nutrition;” indeed.Van Baarle gives the low down on how Jumbo guys are fresh as daisies every day at stage races - it's the grub! So will some team try to poach the nutrition guys at Jumbo?
https://cyclinguptodate.com/cycling...ict-within-jumbo-visma-at-the-vuelta-a-espana
Comparing the differences between INEOS and Jumbo-Visma, van Baarle has noticed a few key things that set the two teams apart. "They are both looking for marginal gains , but the biggest difference is the nutrition and the nutrition coaches," he explains. "In this way I really took another step forward, especially in the big tours. After every ride your recovery feels better and I didn't have any bad days. That has to do with the nutrition we get both on and off the bike."
This Cian beef is soooo hilarious!
So, are we to expect some update soon as Plugge has mentioned Hessmann?Hessmann has always denied deliberately doping with Plugge and Team Visma | Lease a Bike giving him their full backing. So if not deliberate, how could both samples have tested positive? Plugge thinks he knows the answer to that conundrum. “It appears to have been a contamination."
The German prosecutor has dismissed the criminal investigation into Hessmann's case, which means that he can't be prosecuted. He could still be suspended though, which shows the absurdity of the current doping regulations: they act on a presumption of guilt rather than innocence.
Visma–Lease a Bike has signed a three-year partnership with Ketone-IQ, an industry-leading American brand that produces a ketone ester drink. In the announcement on Visma–Lease a Bike’s website, the team’s performance nutritionist Martijn Redegeld stated that “we have several years of experience with this supplement, and we are positive about the effects. After taking ketones, riders recover better from a hard training session or race because the body's fuel stores are replenished faster. Sleep quality also improves. In this way, we increase training efficiency”.
Kind of. The burden of proof is on the athlete, because the evidence already exists in the sample/passport. Unlike criminal law though they do get a second test with the B Sample and also Athlete explanation for some substances which can null the AAF entirely. That doesn't happen in criminal law. Your DNA from the scene of the crime is evidence, you don't get a second attempt to prove the DNA isn't yours like WADA allow.The German prosecutor has dismissed the criminal investigation into Hessmann's case, which means that he can't be prosecuted. He could still be suspended though, which shows the absurdity of the current doping regulations: they act on a presumption of guilt rather than innocence.
This kind of journalism is so lazy... they use ketones (the majority of the peloton does), Grischa Niermann was an EPO user (we know that because he has actually confessed it, unlike a lot of others), and they ride fast (yes they do, but the fastest one doesn't use ketones, making your first point moot). It's like they have to insert a critical note because otherwise it might seem like this team is clean, which of course is absolutely impossible.... The Dutch squad has dominated the peloton for years but is also viewed critically. This is because they provide their riders with ketones, a not prohibited but highly controversial substance; because the sports director Grischa Niermann has his own past as an EPO offender; also because the top performers like Jonas Vingegaard and Sepp Kuss have recently distanced the field so markedly at the Tour de France and the Vuelta a España. ...
If @Froome .. ..if bernal signed with jumbo they would heal his back...if francisco mancebo signed with jumbo they would straighten him up