Ferminal said:Yes, Nibali hasn't doped since Etna 2010. That was before the amnesty so we don't hold it against him.
Was that the 1998 amnesty, the 2005 amnesty, the 2006 amnesty, the 2009 amnesty...........................................?
The Cycling News forum is looking to add some volunteer moderators with Red Rick's recent retirement. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
Ferminal said:Yes, Nibali hasn't doped since Etna 2010. That was before the amnesty so we don't hold it against him.
manafana said:I think the wereabouts system could be used to limit the amount of time a cyclist or athlete could spend in these remote locations that are not their home,...
nah. unless you watch a rider 24/7 for 12 months, the winner in july will always be propped.peterst6906 said:Really. It's a sport, not a police state. Why should any of the riders be limited from going anywhere they want for as long as they like?
If they cheat, they should be caught, but the system isn't broken through the freedom of the riders, it's broken because of a corrupt administration.
Until the administration is fixed, nothing will change. The only ones who would be limited would be the honest ones.
blackcat said:why change it. as long as athletes are safe, and not used as scapegoats like kohl and ricco and landis, then that is the best you can hope and avoid the injuries to vdb and pantani.
manafana said:I think the wereabouts system could be used to limit the amount of time a cyclist or athlete could spend in these remote locations that are not their home, the cost of sending a tester to this mountain in tenerife as opposed to an apartment in Nice is surely been factored in.
manafana said:I think the wereabouts system could be used to limit the amount of time a cyclist or athlete could spend in these remote locations that are not their home, the cost of sending a tester to this mountain in tenerife as opposed to an apartment in Nice is surely been factored in.
Perhaps it is more something in the middle...peterst6906 said:Really. It's a sport, not a police state. Why should any of the riders be limited from going anywhere they want for as long as they like?
If they cheat, they should be caught, but the system isn't broken through the freedom of the riders, it's broken because of a corrupt administration.
Until the administration is fixed, nothing will change. The only ones who would be limited would be the honest ones.
Fearless Greg Lemond said:Perhaps it is more something in the middle...
How long does it take to bring a sample from Tenerife to a WADA accreditated lab?
So, give or take 4 to 5 hours, even taking traffic jams into account.Le Baroudeur said:About 2hrs 15min flight plus 45min transfer either end going by WADA's accredited labs list. Less than most locations in the USA.
but we know there is a political game at play with "who" gets caught. how many cyclists have got caught for hgh. heck, how many athletes have got caught? I know the English rugby player committed suiced, but Sinkewitz is the only one to get "caught" in cycling.ebandit said:athletes are only scapegoats AFTER being caught
until then they are free to travel and do as they please observing WADA
regulations
the sadness of vdb and pantani is not the issue here
Mark L
Fearless Greg Lemond said:So, give or take 4 to 5 hours, even taking traffic jams into account.
Do you know if samples are frozen at the spot? Or at the lab?
Fearless Greg Lemond said:So, give or take 4 to 5 hours, even taking traffic jams into account.
Do you know if samples are frozen at the spot? Or at the lab?
blackcat said:but we know there is a political game at play with "who" gets caught. how many cyclists have got caught for hgh. heck, how many athletes have got caught? I know the English rugby player committed suiced, but Sinkewitz is the only one to get "caught" in cycling.
Spectacleur said:Good point.
ebandit said:do we? sure you want to know and state so above............is it stated
anywhere else...............somewhere with more clout?
of course we have seen reasons for suspicion but it's not fact
Mark L
------------------131313 said:It's not a good point, it's a ridiculous point. If anything, carrying out OOC tests in Tenerife should be among the least expensive ways to test riders, since there's regularly a large group of riders in the area. Testers don't travel from the labs to rider's homes. Generally they live in the area and test riders from their geographic location.
The problem is not the riders' "remote" location, because it's not all that remote and there's almost always a large group of riders there. The problem seems to be the governing body's desire to actually enforce the rules.
People need to get over this Tenerife thing. Riders go there because it's a good place to train. Drugs go there because there are a lot of riders there. A rider can dope anywhere, location really doesn't have much to do with it.
Armchaircyclist said:------------------
The place is stuffed with old people and doctors. But you're right it's a great place for winter training. Maybe not if you want to practice descending in the rain. But for staying healthy and getting good workouts it must be perfect. And it's also a place largely controlled by mafia, plus a major drug-port into europe. No idea if this is helpful for the pro-teams.
Benotti69 said:Maybe the local mafia control the OOC testers.
131313 said:It's not a good point, it's a ridiculous point. If anything, carrying out OOC tests in Tenerife should be among the least expensive ways to test riders, since there's regularly a large group of riders in the area. Testers don't travel from the labs to rider's homes. Generally they live in the area and test riders from their geographic location.
The problem is not the riders' "remote" location, because it's not all that remote and there's almost always a large group of riders there. The problem seems to be the governing body's desire to actually enforce the rules.
People need to get over this Tenerife thing. Riders go there because it's a good place to train. Drugs go there because there are a lot of riders there. A rider can dope anywhere, location really doesn't have much to do with it.
131313 said:It's not a good point, it's a ridiculous point. If anything, carrying out OOC tests in Tenerife should be among the least expensive ways to test riders, since there's regularly a large group of riders in the area. Testers don't travel from the labs to rider's homes. Generally they live in the area and test riders from their geographic location.
The problem is not the riders' "remote" location, because it's not all that remote and there's almost always a large group of riders there. The problem seems to be the governing body's desire to actually enforce the rules.
People need to get over this Tenerife thing. Riders go there because it's a good place to train. Drugs go there because there are a lot of riders there. A rider can dope anywhere, location really doesn't have much to do with it.
manafana said:your final paragraph is one of best put iv seen this on this forum.
Dear Wiggo said:Tenerif:
No cobbles
No rain
Not cold
Not the best place for:
* classics preparation (cold, wet, cobbles, flat roads, pedaling non-stop for 6+ hours)
* practicing descending in wet conditions (cold, wet)
* training in the wet (cold, wet)
thehog said:Kerrisons magic number machine didn't program rain into his equations.
Sounds like Kerrisons been given too much authority. Having the riders pace in a straight line all day has done nothing for race tactics.
One thing for sure is that last years Tour was a gift for Wiggins.