Tuarts said:So most pick Breschel because he was named in this thread or because he was the most high profile rider with a bad season?
Look at Lloyd and Sicard, less than 50% picked them despite being zero-pointers. Oh yes, huge influence. Then you get even less % for the names lower. Sounds too much like Cletus with his pitchfork talk to me.
In fact in my opinion, the only one who may have been overpicked because of mentions is Henao, however that is more a forum-wide thing that this thread.
taiwan said:Snip>
RENSHAW Mark 286 900
<snip
mc_mountain said:i'm a bit surprised by the faith shown in Renshaw, a good chance to increase his score of course but by an exciting/game changing amount? i'm not sure he'll do better than 400-450 (appreciate your score above is a 'best case' one).
Kvinto said:900 points' expectation from Renshaw is indeed too many but you don't have to be one of the best sprinters to score many CQ points in sprints, look at Theo Bos - 460 points in second-tier races, i guess Renshaw is capable of more, he just has to participate in 'right' races which means rather races with 'right' competition![]()
miguelvazpinto said:He gave an interview early this week and he said he is confident about being the choice to lead RadioShack in Spain at La Vuelta. In spite of our cycling game I hope he can have the opportunity to do that.
mc_mountain said:but will he go for those races? His ambition will be the races with the wrong competition. Well of course the season will answer these questions.
LaFlorecita said:No, I'm not a fan because I've lost faith.![]()
LaFlorecita said:No, I'm not a fan because I've lost faith.![]()
ingsve said:Yep. I copied everyones team into a long list (4000 names) and then sorted by name and counted how many duplicates each name had. It took a total of perhaps 3-4 hours.
18-Valve. (pithy) said:You lost faith in a good outcome of this case, is what you said. So did I, but what does that have to do with being a fan of him?
He'll be back just like Basso, Scarponi, Valverde, etc., etc. It's part of the game. There's no need to lose sleep over it. He'll be fine.
The Hitch said:Wait. Your "not a fan" anymore? Or do you mean that you are no longer such a big fan but still a fan?
The Hitch said:Hell never get nominated for the sporting awards again. The haters of cycling around the world will talk about how this "cheat" doesnt deserve to be mentione in the same breadth as the perfectly clean and fair (sarcasm is my own) Messi, Bolt etc.
So he wont be fine.
The Hitch said:Out of interest, if you spend 4 hours coutning names, how many hours did you devote to your team?![]()
ingsve said:Skibby beat me to it but here is my list of picked riders (It's all counted by hand so there might be some errors):
BRESCHEL Matti 105
VELITS Peter 91
...
ZANDIO ECHAIDE Xabier 2
ingsve said:Probably something similar if not less. I did keep a list during the year of riders that were struggling with injuries or young riders to keep an eye on for the future.
skidmark said:ugh, I just spent an hour and a half typing some thoughts about my team and then my computer crashed... well, not gonna do that again. Short version: I like my team, picked a lot of riders I liked to cheer for anyway, 9 riders back from last year. I'm not going to be bold enough to proclaim myself 'future winner' or anything, but I'm pretty confident my team can top 5 or top 10. Last year I got 21st with less knowledge about how CQ worked (now I know that neo-pros are often good buys, and there are so many French and Italian races for riders to get points on Pro Conti teams), with stupid Ricco and Pelizotti, and with bad luck/injuries/sidelining of some major buys (Kreuziger, Boonen, Ballan), and of course the unfortunate Soler. With all riders healthy and some luck, it's not a stretch to see myself doing well.