The 2025 CQ Ranking Manager Thread

Page 55 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Nov 14, 2024
7
5
45
Vingegaard not adding anything to his original schedule makes me a bit angry.... the "easy" stage race points were meant to be his bread and butter, as he won't defeat the new cannibal at Le Tour.
I think Vingegaard could still get a 2000 more points in Dauphine, TdF, Vuelta.
In the end Ayuso seems to be the best big pick though. Regret not choosing him.
 
To be fair it has made the game a lot more interesting with the two super obvious big ticket riders not having the big bounce back season that could have reasonably been expected.
I don't see how it's better for the game when bad luck for the most expensive popular rider completely tanks him as a pick, because it means that the 35% of teams who have him are basically out of the running now through no fault of their own. IMO the season would have been at its most interesting if both Vingegaard and Van Aert had done as/slightly worse than expected, leaving them as solid picks but not complete musthaves, because that's the only scenario where the super obvious big ticket riders don't almost single-handedly dictate the game trajectory. And that just isn't what's happening.

Although tbf I might also be a little salty because I'm 26 points away from being both the best Vingegaard-Van Aert team and the best Vingegaard team in general, and therefore might have had a shot at victory had they been collectively on track.
 
Last edited:
Although tbf I might also be a little salty because I'm 26 points away from being both the best Vingegaard-Van Aert team and the best Vingegaard team in general, and therefore might have had a shot at victory had they been collectively on track.
Yeah, to make it still a season, that also Vingegaard owners can enjoy here, we should establish an extra competition here for everyone, who bet on the wrong horse this year.

This is right now the ranking of Vingegaard owners:

 
I don't see how it's better for the game when bad luck for the most expensive popular rider completely tanks him as a pick, because it means that the 35% of teams who have him are basically out of the running now through no fault of their own. IMO the season would have been at its most interesting if both Vingegaard and Van Aert had done as/slightly worse than expected, leaving them as solid picks but not complete musthaves, because that's the only scenario where the super obvious big ticket riders don't almost single-handedly dictate the game trajectory. And that just isn't what's happening.

Although tbf I might also be a little salty because I'm 26 points away from being both the best Vingegaard-Van Aert team and the best Vingegaard team in general, and therefore might have had a shot at victory had they been collectively on track.
I had pinned my hopes on Van Aert winning a monument or a couple of other big classics and whilst the RVV/PR pair of 4ths was a solid points haul in relation to his form and the Amstel/BP a nice bonus it needs a good Giro for him to get back on track.

For Jonas it’s not too late for him if he can podium Tour and Vuelta along with 3/4 stage wins though that will be difficult if Pogacar does both as the stage wins will be harder to achieve.
 
Well, I certainly wasn't expecting to get more points from my grand total of - *checks notes* - 3 riders in the Alps and Asturias (2 in one, 1 in the other), than my 7 riders starting FW, one of whom was an outsider to a good result...

111th Liège - Bastogne - Liège

Kasper Asgreen
Magnus Cort Nielsen
Jonas Gregaard Wilsly
Alexander Kamp Egested
Mathias Sunekær Norsgaard (wasn't expecting that...)
Mattias Skjelmose Jensen (apparently he has... "swollen like a sponge" after his crash, so... that's not good...)

Hopefully, I'll have more than 2 riders finishing...
 
Last edited:

TRENDING THREADS