The Evidence

Page 9 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
USPS Contract

"The Company represents that each rider on the Team has a morals turpitude and drug clause that allows the Company to suspend or terminate the rider for cause which shall include items such as (1) conviction of a felony; (2) acts that require the Team to suspend or terminate the rider under the applicable rules of the Union Cycliste Internationale, the Federation Interationale du Cyclisme Professionel; the United States Professional Cycling Federation, Inc; the International Olympic Committee; the International Amateur Cycling Federation; the United States Cycling Federation and all other applicable governing organizations; (3) failure to pass drug or medical tests; (4) inappropriate drug conduct prejudicial to the Team, or the Postal Service, which is in violation of the Team rules or commonly accepted standards of morality; and (5) gross neglect of the rider's duty."

Where Lance got the idea to use a PR firm for Damage Control:

She told Allen Furst of “the Postal Service's concern about the deleterious impact upon the anticipated value of our sponsorship.” She also told him that the agency was hiring a PR firm to control the handling of such things and that the $50,000 cost would be deducted from the overall sponsorship fee.

(Full Story)
 
Public Relations


from David Walsh:

"...When I first interviewed Armstrong in 1993, two days into his first Tour de France, he was 21 and spoke passionately about the role his single mother, Linda, had played in his life."

“She taught that if you give up, you give in,” he said. “I never give up.”


Armstrong, who has never failed a doping test, said he would jump at the chance to put the allegations to rest once and for all, but refused to participate in the Usada process, which he called "one-sided and unfair".


http://www.odwyerpr.com/poll/0526armstrong_pr_strategy.htm


"There comes a point in every man's life when he has to say," "Enough is enough."

"I refuse to participate"

"There were no shortcuts, there was no special treatment."

"Today I turn the page."


The World Anti-Doping Agency chief, John Fahey, believes that Lance Armstrong's decision not to fight doping charges can only lead to the conclusion that he is a 'drug cheat' and he should be stripped of his seven Tour de France titles.


"He had the right to rip up those charges but he elected not to, therefore the only interpretation in these circumstances is that there was substance in those charges," Fahey told Reuters on Friday.

"I'm not going to attempt to understand why he's done that ... I can only take it as it stands – that it leads only to the conclusion that he is a drug cheat. My understanding is that when the evidence is based upon a career that included seven Tour de France wins then all of that becomes obliterated."


http://www.guardian.co.uk/sport/2012/aug/24/lance-armstrong-wada


But... before he gave up, he hired:

BazaarVoice


& after... PR Week launched this:

aug_24_armstrong_poll_home_290381.jpg


http://www.prweekus.com/online-polls/section/990/


BazaarVoice seems to have purged any mention of LA, but a Google Search reveals a fragment:

Stephen Collins Joins Bazaarvoice as Chief Financial Officer ...
http://www.bazaarvoice.com › About › Press RoomSep 30, 2010 – Bazaarvoice, the market and technology leader in hosted social ... athletes including 7-time Tour de France winner, Lance Armstrong.


Which is curious because BV is an Austin, Texas Firm?

http://www.businessweek.com/ap/2012-07-05/bazaarvoice-tweaks-outlook-after-powerreviews-deal



& Insider's Respond:


Rate Lance Armstrong’s reputation:

It’s in tatters. He’s never going to regain his former status: 24%

Armstrong’s never failed a drug test. Until he does, I’ll believe he’s innocent*: 42%

Even if he did use steroids, so did most of his competitors: 13%

The investigation into him was a jealousy-driven witch hunt. He’s a good man: 21%

Posted 3 days ago.


*Stay Tuned...


More to come...
 
Oct 25, 2010
3,049
2
0
A 2005 planned Discovery hotel search was somehow blocked:

“I know that during the 2005 Tour de France, on the second rest day in Pau, the U.S. Postal team was on the verge of undergoing a search of its hotel,” he told the Journal du Dimanche. [Note - the team was called Discovery Channel that year due to a sponsor change - ed.] “A French investigation team had come from Paris to make a raid. But I know from a very good source that at about five o’clock, while they were at the hotel, investigators received a red light"

Read more: http://www.velonation.com/News/ID/1...d-hotel-search-was-blocked.aspx#ixzz24rAi9vrl
 
TubularBills said:
But... before he gave up, he hired:

BazaarVoice


& after... PR Week launched this:

aug_24_armstrong_poll_home_290381.jpg


http://www.prweekus.com/online-polls/section/990/


BazaarVoice seems to have purged any mention of LA, but a Google Search reveals a fragment:

Which is curious because BV is an Austin, Texas Firm?

Yes it's in Austin, but that's all. Based on some SEC documents I found and some of the corporation information there's no direct liestrong equity. This post sums up their current state of affairs nicely: http://seekingalpha.com/article/658291-bazaarvoice-s-valuation-is-utterly-bizarre

It seems to me hiring a company like bazaarvoice for a guy like Wonderboy is to have report-ready public opinion data.
 
Jul 7, 2012
509
0
0
Translation of the article <<Ici, rien n'a change>> published in L'Equipe on 05 June 2007.

He became a gardener but on this Occasion Jesus Manzano is collaborating with the Italian justice Dept. Tomorrow he'll go to Rome to help the judge who is investigating Basso to decode the medical prescriptions and to recognize the doping products. Jesus Manzano, the ex-cyclist of Kelme is an expert. In 2004, he admitted that he took drugs during his entire career and he almost died because of it. The Spanish Justice buried his story but the investigation of the Spanish Police has revealed one of the biggest scandals in the history of cycling. Manzano has still things to say about it....

"Are you feeling a little pride about the effects that your statements are having?"

-I'm just telling my story to the paper, AS. I was the first but others confirmed. Dario Gadeo (an ex-cyclist of the Paternina team) and probably others without any fanfare. The problem was that the first judge who came to interrogate me was Italian was Guariniello and not Spanish. More sadly, the Spanish Judge despite everything I told him, didn't think there was anything to investigate more or less ditto for the Spanish cycling federation. A la fede, I gave them viles of epo with prescriptions, with all the proof to confront everyone. But they deem it worth pursing.

"You seem disappointed. Though you're collaborating with Italian authorities and you're only waiting a call from the L'AMA to make yourself available to them..."

- I will continue the fight if it will serve a purpose. It Italy, France and Germany, things change. In Spain I prefer to let it go. Here, nothing's changed. I'm tired. I don't have any faith in the (Spanish) authority. I remember during the Vuelta 2003, Fuentes arrived at our hotel driving a porsche with thermoses of epo on the passenger seats without hiding them. At the same time, at the Giro or the Tour, we were already being careful.

"Why were you being so careful?"

-They called someone who wasn't part of the team to transport the products. In France it was a nurse her nickname was Paloma Blanca. They paid her 27,000 euros to do this. Each cyclist paid 3,000 each. She transported epo, testosterone, the synthetic hemogloblin (veterinarian) from hotel to hotel. She was and still is the fiancee of a mechanic who is working for Caisse d'epargne team. Everyone throughout cyclist knows this story. I gave all the proof and said everything but there's too much pressure and probably too much money and too much money to loose. And so the truth is everyone in Spain is still doing this.

"How can that be?"

-Belda is working for a team and Fuentes and I can guarantee that he'll begin again on a smaller scale. He's still helping athletes recuperate from their efforts. Why wouldn't he still be doing what he was doing before? He's free, the justice didn't sentence him for what he did even though he had proof.

"Manolo Saiz, one of the managers in the pelotons, isn't influencing anyone anymore...."

-Don't dream, he'll come back. For the moment, he's occupied with recuperating his money. He'll be back. After that, he'll let the time go by and then he'll begin again to get new sponsors. These new sponsors will ignore who he is and look the other way. In general, don't kid yourself because they fired one or two sporting directors. Jose Miguel Echavarri (who was the former director of Indurain's Banesto is now the owner of Caisse d'Epargne.) He has explained that his cyclist Valverde is clean. I must be dreaming! Valverde was with Kelme and he was the only one not doing anything wrong....he's in it knee deep with Fuentes. And Echavarri says that he doesn't know anything and he's never seen anything but I know that he personally brought Zaballa to Fuentes. And Jose Maria Jiminez didn't know anything was going on either? So then I'm affirming to you that the world of cycling in Spain is completely corrupt. From top to bottom it goes.

"What exactly are you talking about?"

-I want to give you an example, something I've never spoken about except to the police up until now. It concerns one of the four Spanish Laboratories credited by the UCI. This laboratory who is in charge of sending the "UCI" vampires (doctors)to take the samples during the Vuelta and other races is the same lab that's in charge of the doctor visits to the cyclists, they follow the cyclists and give them the stamp of approval on their licenses. The owner of this clinic, a renowned hemotologist, called Walter Viru, who is one of the doctors for Kelme to alert them the day before the UCI vampires were coming to take the samples from the cyclist. And he did the same thing with Del Moral, the doctor for the U.S. Postal team and then Discovery, a good friend of his.

"Are you certain about what you're setting forth here?"

-I experienced it in 2002 and 2003 during the Tour de Spain. I gave the police have all the details and the name of the clinic. Even better I remember one time Viru who acquired the russian epo wanted to know the purity of it before he used it. And so he gave a vile of it to this clinic and had them confirm it was good. An important detail, this laboratory is still accredited by the UCI. When I talk about the mafia, I don't use this word lightly.

"You mentioned Jose Maria Jiminez, el Chava, who died in 2003 from a heartattack. Was it the drugs that killed him?"

-Of course, like it killed Pantani. The drugs lead you to other addictions. The anti-depressants almost automatically accompany other doping treatments. I took up to 8 pills of prozac a day when I was racing.

"Why"

-Prozac cuts the appetite, keeps you in another world, a world where you're not afraid of what you're doing. You're no longer afraid to inject yourself with all the crap. It takes you to a world where you don't ask any more questions especially you don't ask your doctor questions either or your sporting director. Then there are periods where you must stop doping you feel like superman. Then one day all of the sudden it stops and you become dramatically depressed. Look at Pantani, Vandenbroucke and all the others we don't even talk about. They are numerous other cyclists and former cyclists that are addicted to cocaine, heroin and other medications. It's not just in the world of cycling.

"What did you have that El Chava didn't that kept you from falling into a depression?"

-I wasn't a professional cyclist for so long. El Chava stayed 13, 14 yearswith his team and I stayed 5 years. and frankly if I stayed 3 more years, I'd be dead from it. I knew Panatani and I knew hi m wlel. In 2002 and 2004 he came to work for Clarvoyrl and we rode together and we partied together. too many years in the business and unfortunatley more to follow.

"What's the solution?"

-Fire all the sporting directors. Riis is showing the example. It's good that he admitted now that he has to make the next step which is to quit the sport. How can he be taken to be credible? He's admitted to doping and now he wants us to believe he's going to go back to cycling and this is supposed to make us believe drugs won't be used anymore? There's only one solution: he must leave! And along with him all the sporting directors who have been working for the past 10 years have to quit also. They're the responsible ones. The directors are the ones who blackmail the cyclists they put pressure on the riders to take the epo and all the drugs and the cyclists can't refuse if they want to ride for the team. These directors are the ones who prolong the system and little by little pressure the pros into it. First you go slowly, then you fall slowly then you realize you've thrown everything away. They say to you "here's your choice: you do want we say or you're done cycling."

"How do you explain you never tested positive?"

-I told you about the clinic that fudged everything. There is a red powder that's made in an illegal lab just for them outside of any controls which destroys the urine sample. This powder comes in the form of a grain of rice that we put into our penis before we pee. The russian epo caused my teammates to be caught.

"What do you think of cycling today?

-It was my dream, my life. Today I'm completely indifferent to it. How could it be otherwise? When I see Valverde, Mancebo or Sevilla win I know what's going on. And that kills my love for the sport. Cycling is corrupt. You can see that on the side of the roads there's nobody left cheering on the cyclists except for the Tour. Even the cows aren't duped.

Many cycling news-sites printed this interview in full, apart from omitting the reference to USP/ Discovery...
 
May 26, 2010
28,143
5
0
Robert21 said:
Many cycling news-sites printed this interview in full, apart from omitting the reference to USP/ Discovery...

Thanks for posting.

Manzano makes lots of good points.

It also begs the question why are riders still based in Girona if they are clean?

Why not Perpignan in France where doping is a crime!

Armstrong had a house in Girona when he was riding.
 
Benotti69 said:
Thanks for posting.

Manzano makes lots of good points.

It also begs the question why are riders still based in Girona if they are clean?

Why not Perpignan in France where doping is a crime!

Armstrong had a house in Girona when he was riding.

Cheaper housing might be a reason, as well as better tax regime. Don't think Girona necessarily equates to doping.
 
May 26, 2010
28,143
5
0
Arnout said:
Cheaper housing might be a reason, as well as better tax regime. Don't think Girona necessarily equates to doping.

Fair enough. I though most riders set up companies such as Fuglsang, but i suppose that only works when you are paid big money.

I doubt riders would be buying houses. Renting might be cheaper.
 
Race Radio said:
http://www.stuff.co.nz/the-press/opinion/7552391/Drug-cheat-claims-are-well-founded

David Walsh

Over the next 10 days there will be a lot of evidence. Tyler's book launch has been moved up and the organized smear campaign focused on anyone who told the truth will be significant.

"I'll say one thing about the book, especially since the esteemed author is here. In my view, I think extraordinary accusations must be followed up with extraordinary proof. And Mr Walsh and Mr Ballester worked for years and they have not come up extraordinary proof."

Lance was right. He can't argue with himself. The avalanche of proof has started down the hill.
 
Race Radio said:
http://www.stuff.co.nz/the-press/opinion/7552391/Drug-cheat-claims-are-well-founded

David Walsh

Over the next 10 days there will be a lot of evidence. Tyler's book launch has been moved up and the organized smear campaign focused on anyone who told the truth will be significant.

The thing that strikes me about the article is the abject cowardice of the press. Not that they would not call him a doper, but that they allowed him to hold them hostage and they sang his praises while he was doing it.
 
This really describes the experience of several friends and former teammates of Lance that refused to Program Up.

Dr. Prentice Steffen, his diplomas attest to the fact, is a model doctor. Specialist in both Emergency Medicine and Sports Medicine, he worked for four years, from 1993-1996, with the American cyclists of the teams Subaru-Montgomery then US Postal. In 1996, "during the height of the reign of EPO", his riders were totally destroyed during the Tour of Switzerland and two among them, Marty Jemison and Tyler Hamilton, asked him in veiled words to help them dope. He refused and alerted the team directors. At the end of the year, his contract was not renewed and one morning the mailman delivered him a registered letter with the intimidation order to not talk about his experience in the heart of US Postal. "A few months later," he remembers, "the nine riders of the team rode the Champs-Elysees of the finish of the 1997 Tour de France. I realized they'd move on to EPO...". Today, despite threats from Lance Armstrong (1), Dr. Steffen is still in the milieu (of cycling). He takes care of a team of young American professionals (TIAA-CREF) which disputed the latest edition of the Tour de l'Avenir.

One in particular was told Mr. Weisel found him "unprofessional" for refusing Eddie B's program on Mont-Subaru. This, well before USPS. The die was cast from top of the organization to the bottom very early on.

Note to Gree: yes, someone was in the room then when Lance got his shot...
 
BroDeal said:
The thing that strikes me about the article is the abject cowardice of the press. Not that they would not call him a doper, but that they allowed him to hold them hostage and they sang his praises while he was doing it.

Cycling journalism pays pathetic amounts and if you're not st the Tour then you're a nobody.

Every English speaking journalist whether from a cycling publication or not were told "get an interview with Lance and you can go back next year"by ther bosses.

You had no choice. Cycling is small fry in the grand scheme of things. Especially back then.

If you wrote a negative article about Lance one phone call was made and you weren't at next years Tour. Every journalist knew that.

Problem you had there were 100 guys, more or willing to step into your job if you failed.

I agree with you. Not enough people stood up. The Tour is party time for journalists. Every night over beers it was joked about the amount of drugs USPS were doing.

The journalists also became "watchers" for Armstrong and Bruyneel. They'd tell on other journalists writing bad articles and tip off if they heard anything from the French police all in return for a few quotes/comments.
 
Tygart stated he was going to sedn the evidence against Armstrong in the next couple of weeks.

My question is, will this become public seeing as they have arbitration hearings with Bruyneel and Marti pending or will that have to wait?
 
mewmewmew13 said:
Whoa.
Fasten the seatbelts...
Is anyone surprised about a ramped up smear campaign?

How long does one smear for? 6 months? A year? 5 years?

The titles still go. He still loses his titles.

It's pointless and futile.

The smart journalists right now are not writing articles. They're investigating.

Give it time.

It's coming.
 
thehog said:
How long does one smear for? 6 months? A year? 5 years?

The titles still go. He still loses his titles.

Smearing isn't free either. You have to pay comment-writers less than lawyers, for sure, but that still makes for an impressive burn rate with no money coming in. What is the quid-pro-quo back to some media property? He's pretty radioactive already and it's going to get worse.

I'm not going anywhere either, and the only story left to tell is increasingly ridiculous. That alone will turn off the many, many people more or less indifferent to the whole thing. Lance is mostly doing this to himself and he's not done destroying the myth. He's doing a good job of it. Not fast enough for me, but it's good practice.
 
The Feds, Novitzky, Weisel & the Qui Tam Whistleblower Case


The SF Weekly Series

Legal Complications on Steroids

If Lance Armstrong were found to have been on drugs, and his S.F. handlers knew it, sponsors could demand their money back, and perhaps change sports in the U.S. forever

By Matt Smith
Article Published Dec 7, 2005


If a Postal Service team member were shown to have doped during the past five years, the prospect for such an investigation could be particularly ominous for the Weisel sports companies where Osipow served as an executive. Starting in 2001, sponsorship agreements between the U.S. Postal Service and these companies included strong anti-drugs language under which the contracts could be thrown out if team management knew of athletes' drug use and looked the other way. Copies of the agreements I obtained had the sponsorship amounts blacked out. Press reports, however, have claimed the USPS paid out around $10 million per year during the agreement, underwriting Armstrong's Tour victories between 1999 and 2004.

The Postal Service is considered a government agency under an 1863 federal law called the False Claims Act designed to root out fraud against the government. That means that any insider who believes he has evidence that would hold up in court showing Armstrong used drugs while his team management knew yet quietly looked the other way could potentially reap a bonanza under legal provisions that give whistle-blowers a share of any lawsuit's proceeds.

"Like most cycling fans I would be reluctant to believe Lance Armstrong, or any other member of the U.S. Postal Service Team, used performance-enhancing drugs. But if that were indeed the case, and the company was aware of that at the time, the company may very well have exposure for treble damages under the False Claims Act," says Paul Scott, a former U.S. Department of Justice trial attorney in San Francisco specializing in cases involving the act.

I asked Scott, and a different False Claims Act specialist who spoke off the record, to review pages from copies of sponsorship agreements between the Postal Service and Weisel-affiliated companies. I asked them to consider an imagined scenario in which a team member was found to have improperly used drugs, the team organization knew about it, then hid it from its government sponsor.

"The default clause would seem to indicate that compliance with the drug clause was a condition of payment. If that were the case, and they violated the drug clause, and they knew about it, and they continued to solicit payment from the government with that knowledge, they may very well have a problem with the U.S. government," Scott said.


(Full Story)



Lance Armstrong Case Takes BALCO Investigator Jeff Novitzky To France

By Matt Smith Wed., Nov. 17 2010 at 11:11 AM


With all those balls successfully aloft, a case might be made that Armstrong had defrauded the federal government out of millions of dollars Will the hammer drop?
(Full Story)



Lance Armstrong Doping Story Points Toward S.F. Company

By Matt Smith Tue., May 24 2011 at 7:54 AM


In 1995, the year Hamilton signed up for Weisel's team, the San Francisco investment banker was frustrated with what had become an expensive hobby, according "Capital Instinctst: Life as an Entrepreneur, Financier and Athlete," a 2003 Weisel autobiography cowritten with technology journalist Richard Brandt. At the time Hamilton joined Montgomery Bell, Weisel "had poured about $5 million of his own money into the team since its inception, with little to show for it."

The next year, however, the Weisel-owned team procured sponsorship from the United States Postal Service. And in 1998, the team recruited Lance Armstrong.


(Full Story)



Lance Armstrong Hires Famous S.F. Attorney, New USPS Sponsorship Details Emerge (This one has a goldmine of evidence links)

By Matt Smith Thu., May 26 2011 at 12:35 PM


In 2000, records obtained by ESPN show team management was barred from permitting doping as far back as 2000. In that document, "team management" was identified as S.F. financier Thomas Weisel, 1984 Olympic Gold Medalist Mark Gorski, and Dan Osipow, who has recently held a job helping manage U.C. Berkeley's sports properties. To make matters even more complicated, various press accounts during the past year have made conflicting statements about whether Armstrong himself had owned the team at some point.

Armstrong issued a vague statement last July, saying he was only a minority owner of Tailwind Sports, and primarily served as a rider-employee. After that, stories appeared indicating he had a given different version of that statement under oath.

In 2005, the USPS Team added an additional sponsor for its European campaign -- Belgian flooring company Berry Floor. However, the company didn't make agreed-upon payments, Tailwind attorneys alleged in a 2006 complaint.

I'll spare you the details of who said what about Berry Floor's purported reneging. What's relevant in 2011 are answers to the question: With whom, precisely, did Berry Floor cut its sponsorship deal? The answer could also provide clues to who, theoretically, might have been in a position to defraud the U.S. Postal Service.


(Full Story)



Sports Illustrated

Landis's accusations may not be the only trouble for Armstrong

...by claiming that he worked with Armstrong's personal trainer, Dr. Michele Ferrari, on other banned performance-enhancers, Landis implies that Armstrong may have been part of a conspiracy to distribute and possess illegal steroids. Conspiracy, which makes it a crime to collaborate on criminal activity, has been used by the Justice Department in other steroid cases, including in the 2004 indictment against Victor Conte, Greg Anderson and other persons connected to the Bay Area Lab Cooperative (BALCO).

Depending on the kinds of factual allegations ultimately levied against Armstrong, he could also be exposed to federal racketeering charges under The Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO). RICO is federal statute that applies to many forms of illegal activity, including drug cases. If Armstrong and others engaged in a continuous and controlled pattern of organizing riders to use or distribute steroids and other illegal substances, RICO would become a more plausible charge. In addition, if Armstrong pressured riders into using drugs without their consent, those riders could in theory use RICO to recover monetary damages. RICO provides for civil recovery and in some cases treble damages.


(Full Story)
 
Jul 31, 2012
56
0
0
TubularBills said:
The Feds, Novitzky, Weisel & the Qui Tam Whistleblower Case


The SF Weekly Series

Legal Complications on Steroids

If Lance Armstrong were found to have been on drugs, and his S.F. handlers knew it, sponsors could demand their money back, and perhaps change sports in the U.S. forever

By Matt Smith
Article Published Dec 7, 2005


Hey, I notice your sig.

Is it possible that Armstrong has called BW demanding that he have nothing to do with P. Kimmage? I recall Kimmage was about to be embedded with Sky, when he was unceremoniously dumped - apparently on the bidding of Brad. Was it around that time Brad started to be publicly very nice about Lance and his legacy.

So we might have both BW and LA anti-Kimmage - one b/c he hates Kimmage for calling him out all these years. The other b/c he is using PEDs (and using a program very like LAs) and b/c Lance the "Godfather" demanded he blacklist Kimmage.