Perhaps "Wilco Keldermann is the new Ullrich" would be more appropriate now. Or we could start calling him Wilco KelGermann.
The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
This is the original new Merckx thread, move along Remco. His thread should be edited to Remco is the new Wilco. It even rhimes.LOL,
Mods, can we have this thread's title edited please?
Like DuškoI've always liked these Dutch, ehm, German names ending on -co.
I've always liked these Dutch, ehm, German names ending on -co.
One could argue that part of being good/better is not to crash that much. Surely some crashes are just bad luck or someone else's fault but when you're crashing that much there has to be something yours's to it (positioning, handling, even fear or insecurity). Or maybe he doesn't crash much more than others statistically but has just bad luck with injuries/consequences.At the rate he keeps crashing and keeps injuring himself, last year's Giro could be haunting him for the rest of his life. He's never going to have a chance like that again.
Still wondering if or how much better he could have been without months/years of injuries that pulled him back.
so unlucky at wellAt the rate he keeps crashing and keeps injuring himself, last year's Giro could be haunting him for the rest of his life. He's never going to have a chance like that again.
Still wondering if or how much better he could have been without months/years of injuries that pulled him back.
I don't think he can regret anything about that Giro though (apart from his interviews).At the rate he keeps crashing and keeps injuring himself, last year's Giro could be haunting him for the rest of his life. He's never going to have a chance like that again.
Maybe given the circumstances, he couldn't have done any better, but I still think a Kelderman in his best shape, could have sealed the deal. Or if he rode for a team that allowed ketones? I don't know.I don't think he can regret anything about that Giro though (apart from his interviews).
He rode to his limit. Hindley and TGH were simply better.
Did he have issues like this in his junior/espoir years? I can't remember anything that would indicate his run of accidents/injuries due to lack of bikehandling skills. I've been wondering if it could be related to lack of concentration?One could argue that part of being good/better is not to crash that much. Surely some crashes are just bad luck or someone else's fault but when you're crashing that much there has to be something yours's to it (positioning, handling, even fear or insecurity). Or maybe he doesn't crash much more than others statistically but has just bad luck with injuries/consequences.
So 5th in GC..., but really this is just an invisible and pretty meaningless performance imo.
Well, in Wilco's defence he fell 3 times this Tour de France and had a bruised elbow the entire TDF. Which seriously hampered him in the time trials. I think he did well considering.So 5th in GC..., but really this is just an invisible and pretty meaningless performance imo.
That's a bit of a stretch to me.I rate this higher than last years Giro.
His skeleton is more terminator than bone at this point.How many broken bones in this guy's career so far?
just to crash again at some point... och... Wilco... I feel for you man... but I really hope you won't get a job in public transportation once you're done with crashing on bikePelvic fracture is never good for a cyclist. I know he has come back from some nasty crashes so I'm hoping he can recover soon.