We'll know more after the TTT, but it seems it's between him, Plapp and Bilbao.Good start for Remco today. He got rid of Yates in the winds. Bilbao is still in there though.
The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
We'll know more after the TTT, but it seems it's between him, Plapp and Bilbao.Good start for Remco today. He got rid of Yates in the winds. Bilbao is still in there though.
We'll know more after the TTT, but it seems it's between him, Plapp and Bilbao.
That's his Monster engine.Quite nice to see the world champion actively doing echelon riding, not hiding, just racing and seemingly enjoying it.
TTT might make sure that Bilbao is out of the race, but doesn't INEOS have proper riders with them? It's not like SQ has brought their A-team for this type of work. It might be more likely that Plapp takes more time.The TTT now could already seal the deal if there are big gaps after between Evenepoel, Bilbao and Plapp, unless UAE takes the time back on the others, which is not likely.
TTT might make sure that Bilbao is out of the race, but doesn't INEOS have proper riders with them? It's not like SQ has brought their A-team for this type of work. It might be more likely that Plapp takes more time.
Yes, this remains to be seen.TTT might make sure that Bilbao is out of the race, but doesn't INEOS have proper riders with them? It's not like SQ has brought their A-team for this type of work. It might be more likely that Plapp takes more time.
Better than Van Aert on the flat by some margin? No.Best rouleur in the world by some margin
And vice versa.Better than Van Aert on the flat by some margin? No.
It's not even close. If they do a duo time trial where each does exactly 50% of the work, Van Aert gets demolished.Better than Van Aert on the flat by some margin? No.
Quite sure he is, yes. If Van Aert were in the same ballpark as Evenepoel, he would win a lot more races with long solo efforts, especially since his sprinting in small groups is rather suspect.Better than Van Aert on the flat by some margin? No.
Add crosswinds and the TTT could be the most important stage.The TTT now could already seal the deal if there are big gaps after between Evenepoel, Bilbao and Plapp, unless UAE takes the time back on the others, which is not likely.
Quite sure he is, yes. If Van Aert were in the same ballpark as Evenepoel, he would win a lot more races with long solo efforts, especially since his sprinting in small groups is rather suspect.
Van Aert is one of the best in the world, just not as good. Also Evenepoel definitely seems to keep fresh longer. After a hard race, he can still whip out a monster solo effort. Van Aert's solo efforts are generally much shorter. Remember Evenepoel's monster attack in Germany in his first season, where he had been doing a solo of i think over 100k and the peloton tore itself to shreds (and in the end needed to be motorpaced) to reel him back.I don't think so. At Omloop last year (and Calais for that matter), it was quite evident that Van Aert is a monster there too. He just rides a bit too passively to show it often.
Flat ITT I take Van Aert. Taking turns in a long road race I take Evenepoel, especially if you have to do a solo after.Better than Van Aert on the flat by some margin? No.
I wonder how big the difference is. I know some research group in Leuven/Eindhoven did a lot of work on CFD simulations about the effects of drafting in groups, TTTs, and even the effects of the car behind a rider in TTTs, but to my knowledge they haven't published anything about the dynamics of riders of different sizes.The problem with Remco is that he generates so little draft, that he will demolisch any rider that is willing to go mano a mano in any kind of Trofeo Baracchi (2 man attack).
Remco gets all the draft by other riders, but he doesn't give much back in return. Very selfish in terms of draft.
Good enough.Would have liked a more TT oriented team as well, but there are a few guys who are used to ride in sprint trains, and often those guys should not be underestimated in a short TTT. It's only 17k. None of the others are bad TT'ers.
I had the misfortune of drawing the position behind our lowest rider in a 40km/ 4 rider TTT and it was painful. There was neglible draft and then my turn to tow...the 3rd rider had a high position and liked to show his strength which added additional pain. Our tallest guy was gone 4km into the effort. The third guy flamed out at 20km and my job was then to bring him back from the gap he'd create. Pure amateur hour but was a good case study on the impact.I wonder how big the difference is. I know some research group in Leuven/Eindhoven did a lot of work on CFD simulations about the effects of drafting in groups, TTTs, and even the effects of the car behind a rider in TTTs, but to my knowledge they haven't published anything about the dynamics of riders of different sizes.
I do think when riders complain "you have no draft behidn Evenepoel" they just mean it's less, not that there is none, and generally riders with a CdA that low (so even smaller riders than Evenepoel) will simply not go nearly as fast as Evenepoel does.
The problem with Remco is that he generates so little draft, that he will demolish any rider that is willing to go mano a mano in any kind of Trofeo Baracchi (2 man attack).
Remco gets all the draft by other riders, but he doesn't give much back in return. Very selfish in terms of draft.
I wonder how big the difference is. I know some research group in Leuven/Eindhoven did a lot of work on CFD simulations about the effects of drafting in groups, TTTs, and even the effects of the car behind a rider in TTTs, but to my knowledge they haven't published anything about the dynamics of riders of different sizes.