Pogi would have won. Yes, his form was fading but he also won Amstel with an equally impressive solo the week before, and in that race, he had a flat for ages and for quite a while was riding with a puncture and yet he still won solo after. The time gaps are slightly bigger because Liege is harder and the riders behind were also solo in Amstel but in a group in Liege so were looking at each other, not to mention the effects of Pogi's puncture. But still, Pogi won by 38s and Remco 1m6s, fairly comparable. Then in Fleche he didn't really exert himself but still won. So Pogi was still in good form. Pogi wouldn't have matched Evenepoel in a TT on the Liege course, but he would have been able to hold his wheel fairly comfortably and outsprint himPogacar would highly likely not have won last years LBL, and not because he wouldn't be able to beat Evenepoel, but because his form was already fading as was evident in Amstel. For 3 out of his 5 monument wins, Pogacar had to win the sprint vs guys like Mas, Masnada and Gaudu. Yet somehow you think Evenepoel is overrated and wouldn't stand a chance.
In the Liege he won, he outsprinted Alaphillippe. He probably could have been able to drop them if he had attacked himself but he trusted his sprint instead. Masnada was only with him at Lombardia because he descended like a lunatic and Pogi took it easy. Mas was in the best form of his career and Pogi was fading big time then, yet he never looked like challenging him in the sprint. Also, sometimes if you are with someone you know you can outsprint, there is no need to try and drop them. Had Pogi not crashed last year he would have won a 2 up sprint with Evenepoel. Yes Evenepoel may have been the stronger rider, but he was not strong enough to drop Pogi and Pogi has a stronger sprint
This whole Pogi was fading (very slightly) so Remco would have won is just nonsense designed to convince yourself that the correct winner won and make you feel better about the injustice of Pogi's crash
Last edited: