Surprising to see so much Cancellara hate.
Just because people fell for the idea that Canc was superman.
As if he won E3 with ease, as if he didnt go through a lot of pain and push his body to the limit to get that victory. As if he went for the 40k itt as if he went on a stroll.
Cancellara is someone with balls who shows spectacular feats.
He was by far the strongest today and hell hath no fury like SPartacus next week.
But about the doping. I know the chances are Cancellara is a doper, I believe he is.
But like with Roessler and Kwiatkowski last week, people, claim they know (without evidence) for 100% that those riders are doping. ANd thats fine, i myself believe all top riders dope. But they act as if the object of their hate was the ONLY person doping.
Because only Roessler and Kwiatkowski took drugs at 3 days of De Panne, and the good guys werent doping, and so you have a classic good vs bad narration which these posters set up in their minds.
So of those accusing Cancellara of doping I ask, either
A prove Cancellara is doping
OR
B If you want to take the Cancellara must be doping because hes a top cyclist angle, then prove that Gilbert ISNT doping. that Boonen ISNT doping. That Pozzato ISNT doping That Ballan ISNT doping. . All these guys with World CHampionshonships, 4 out of the 5 monuments and stages in every gt between them, were in that race too and were up there.
Why is only Cancellara doping?