Tour de France 2016 route prediction

Page 5 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
So it looks almost certain we'll have a TT from Morzine to Les Gets, after a stage to Avoriaz. The most likely route is via Col de l'Encrenaz (7,1 km with 6.3%) and the stage will measure around 22km. Very narrow road but it's ok for a ITT.
 
Re:

McLovin said:
So it looks almost certain we'll have a TT from Morzine to Les Gets, after a stage to Avoriaz. The most likely route is via Col de l'Encrenaz (7,1 km with 6.3%) and the stage will measure around 22km. Very narrow road but it's ok for a ITT.
Morzine - Essert-la-Pierre - Col de l'Encrenaz - Taninges - Les Gets (going down the parallel roads into Taninges) is around 40km... I'd settle for that.
 
Re:

Red Rick said:
Fact is there are a decent amount of posters here who would do a wayyyyy better job at designing routes for GT's. I personally find most Tour and Vuelta routes quite unbelievable in repetitiveness and lack of good stages
Completely agree: give LS the job, and we'll get ourselves a TdF. In their defense though, so much is about the money that there's little wiggle room for the course designers.

How about Madeleine from the south/hardest side, and mid-way in the descent make a left and finish atop la Montee de Lachat? Now that would kick arse. How about climbs in the Pays Basque, or the Mt d'Or (5.1K at 10.5%) for a finish in the Jura mountains?

My route prediction: if you're from Champagne, Bourgogne, Franche Comte, and other forgotten regions, you'll be forgotten again.
 
Re: Re:

Tonton said:
Red Rick said:
Fact is there are a decent amount of posters here who would do a wayyyyy better job at designing routes for GT's. I personally find most Tour and Vuelta routes quite unbelievable in repetitiveness and lack of good stages
Completely agree: give LS the job, and we'll get ourselves a TdF. In their defense though, so much is about the money that there's little wiggle room for the course designers.

How about Madeleine from the south/hardest side, and mid-way in the descent make a left and finish atop la Montee de Lachat? Now that would kick arse. How about climbs in the Pays Basque, or the Mt d'Or (5.1K at 10.5%) for a finish in the Jura mountains?

My route prediction: if you're from Champagne, Bourgogne, Franche Comte, and other forgotten regions, you'll be forgotten again.

Yep, and thats forgotten. Where there is money there is racing, unfortunately.

LS: Have you ever thought about applying for some lesser races as course designer? I bet you know more about the areas you havent ever been than pretty much all course designer. Its freakin scary.
 
You all raise interesting points about the connection between money and route design. However the Vuelta made public some budget figures a few years ago that may still be valid today. The race budget was about 20M€. The cost of hosting a stage departure or finish for the town/region involved was about 50-100K€. Best case is that 20 stage departure/finishes collect 4M€ for the race organiser from the local/regional institutions and that only makes 20% of the budget. The remaining 80% must come from other sources (private sponsors and TV rights, I guess). The actual figure given by Guillén in an interview was that only about 15% of the budget came from public or private sources connected to the hosting towns or regions. On top of this, most of this comes from regional institutions rather than local ones. This has made possible having stage finishes in some small villages or remote mountains in lowly populated areas without a single ski station or any point of interest for masses of tourists just because it fits the race model that Unipublic looks for (Angliru, Ancares, La Camperona, Valdepeñas de Jaén) no matter how pointless may seem to us. With this background knowledge I doubt that ASO cannot do similar for a better course design because of budget constraints.
 
Re:

ice&fire said:
You all raise interesting points about the connection between money and route design. However the Vuelta made public some budget figures a few years ago that may still be valid today. The race budget was about 20M€. The cost of hosting a stage departure or finish for the town/region involved was about 50-100K€. Best case is that 20 stage departure/finishes collect 4M€ for the race organiser from the local/regional institutions and that only makes 20% of the budget. The remaining 80% must come from other sources (private sponsors and TV rights, I guess). The actual figure given by Guillén in an interview was that only about 15% of the budget came from public or private sources connected to the hosting towns or regions. On top of this, most of this comes from regional institutions rather than local ones. This has made possible having stage finishes in some small villages or remote mountains in lowly populated areas without a single ski station or any point of interest for masses of tourists just because it fits the race model that Unipublic looks for (Angliru, Ancares, La Camperona, Valdepeñas de Jaén) no matter how pointless may seem to us. With this background knowledge I doubt that ASO cannot do similar for a better course design because of budget constraints.

Good input. It just seems the TdF is a lot more conservative regarding that, at least for now. Curious how many % of the budget comes from hosting and finishing towns in the Tour - probably more I assume?
 
Jul 24, 2014
150
0
0
Re: Re:

Gigs_98 said:
Moviestar said:
Sergi Lopez confirms Le Mont Ventoux on 14th july on his Twitter.
strange date. Am I right this wont be a weekend stage.

No, not a weekend stage, but Mont Ventoux on Bastille Day as per 2013, makes sense.
 
Sep 1, 2015
6
0
0
Montpellier-Mont Ventoux, Thursday, 14 July
CRI Bourg-Saint Andeol-Vallon Pont Arc, +- 45 km, Friday 15 July.
Montelimar- ¿Gap?, Saturday, 16 July.
 
Re: Re:

Tonton said:
Moviestar said:
Sergi Lopez confirms Le Mont Ventoux on 14th july on his Twitter.

132415261__431808c.jpg