Re:
I admit he is decling a little. IMO he wanst the stronger in 2014...the best in result finally, yes, but Froome showed better than him on Dauphiné, both in good shape, building for le Tour, but yes, respect 2014 he is declining, but no too much as some people say here as you. Crashes didnt have the importance he says, but a little. Froome crashed as well anyway.
And I think the best yeard of Rigo are to come, and he has 5 good years at top level.
The problem with him is that he is good at hilly and mountain clasics, 3 podium at Lombardia, 5th at Liege, GP Quebec /and 3rd), silver at the olimpics, GP Piemonte (and 8th), 3rd at the GP Industria, 3rd Milano Torino,3rd Giro del Emillia, 7th at Strade Bianche, 8th and 10th San Sebastian, 7th Amorebieta,...so he has to chose well the calendar to cover both Tours and classics...and maybe the best race for him for his abilities is the Tour...but you need a good team at le Tour, or to take it easy at the begining as he did this year and to have luck with crashes...Maybe he is not the best bet to win le Tour, but he has the potential for that, he had always and he promised that always since he came to Europe just at the age of 19. (and he was 35 at Emillia at 19)
Contador is better than in 2013, he was second this year in a lot of races, so he is not clearly declining. We will see how he will be on of the best in the last ITT, as he has been always at ITT like thar.Monstre du Cyclisme said:Maybe not considering nowadays riders are competitive way into their thirties...
I am not sure of this. Contador is clearly declining, Nibali shows the same signs and even for Froome is suspected to decline by a lot of users. Horner is the exception but certainly not the rule. The same goes for Valverde. It's not that Uran will get plenty of chances again. At least he cannot be certain. If he end 2nd or 3rd is not that important. But Aru, Martin and Landa are still relatively close. You can end up 6th and no one will ever remember you.
Anyway, if Uran is strong enough to beat Froome, then an attack on the Col d'Izoard is more than enough. He doesn't need minutes. It's more or less a minute to get into touching distance and maybe 1:30 to feel a bit of safety. Such distances you can create on the last climb. There, you also see how your competitors for the podium are going and what would you risk going all in. There is absolutely no way an attack at the Allos would be successful. If Froome is so weak that he and his team couldn't make up for the losses on the descent and the false flat, then he would severely crack on the last climb anyway.
I admit he is decling a little. IMO he wanst the stronger in 2014...the best in result finally, yes, but Froome showed better than him on Dauphiné, both in good shape, building for le Tour, but yes, respect 2014 he is declining, but no too much as some people say here as you. Crashes didnt have the importance he says, but a little. Froome crashed as well anyway.
And I think the best yeard of Rigo are to come, and he has 5 good years at top level.
The problem with him is that he is good at hilly and mountain clasics, 3 podium at Lombardia, 5th at Liege, GP Quebec /and 3rd), silver at the olimpics, GP Piemonte (and 8th), 3rd at the GP Industria, 3rd Milano Torino,3rd Giro del Emillia, 7th at Strade Bianche, 8th and 10th San Sebastian, 7th Amorebieta,...so he has to chose well the calendar to cover both Tours and classics...and maybe the best race for him for his abilities is the Tour...but you need a good team at le Tour, or to take it easy at the begining as he did this year and to have luck with crashes...Maybe he is not the best bet to win le Tour, but he has the potential for that, he had always and he promised that always since he came to Europe just at the age of 19. (and he was 35 at Emillia at 19)