Tour de France Tour de France 2023, stage 16: Passy - Combloux, 22.4k (ITT)

Page 5 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Why? Then Vingegaard needs to attack.
Whether he attacks or not, it would be ridiculous for the GC to be decided based on Bonus seconds in the last couple stages.

Could you imagine JV up by 7 seconds and Bonusgacar sprinting to the line 4" ahead of JV to win by 1" from the 4" bonus? Lmao at how silly that would be.

Let's just please have someone grab the win rather than something ridiculous like Bonus seconds deciding this.
 
Whether he attacks or not, it would be ridiculous for the GC to be decided based on Bonus seconds in the last couple stages.

Could you imagine JV up by 7 seconds and Bonusgacar sprinting to the line 4" ahead of JV to win by 1" from the 4" bonus? Lmao at how silly that would be.

Let's just please have someone grab the win rather than something ridiculous like Bonus seconds deciding this.
Bonusgacar, thats original and pretty funny honestly! Never seen that one before

I hope Pogacar absolutely destroys Vingegaard tomorrow 2020-style, that would be best for the race IMO!
 
Whether he attacks or not, it would be ridiculous for the GC to be decided based on Bonus seconds in the last couple stages.

Could you imagine JV up by 7 seconds and Bonusgacar sprinting to the line 4" ahead of JV to win by 1" from the 4" bonus? Lmao at how silly that would be.

Let's just please have someone grab the win rather than something ridiculous like Bonus seconds deciding this.

I also enjoyed the Bonusgacar :D

And yeah, that wouldn't feel right, I guess I agree. Even if I am rooting for Pogi.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FrontHeadlock
Whether he attacks or not, it would be ridiculous for the GC to be decided based on Bonus seconds in the last couple stages.

Could you imagine JV up by 7 seconds and Bonusgacar sprinting to the line 4" ahead of JV to win by 1" from the 4" bonus? Lmao at how silly that would be.

Let's just please have someone grab the win rather than something ridiculous like Bonus seconds deciding this.
Bonus seconds make the racing more interesting. If bonus seconds couldn't determine the outcome of the race, there would be no point in them. If you like to be bored, go rewatch the sky train.
 
Bonus seconds make the racing more interesting. If bonus seconds couldn't determine the outcome of the race, there would be no point in them. If you like to be bored, go rewatch the sky train.
Bonus seconds are all fun and games, unless Jonas wins the Tour by 1 second...then we will have months...nay, years of motogate thread wars. In the name of all that is holy, do not let that happen, the world needs less strife right now.
 
Bonus seconds are all fun and games, unless Jonas wins the Tour by 1 second...then we will have months...nay, years of motogate thread wars. In the name of all that is holy, do not let that happen, the world needs less strife right now.

The motos cost Pogi 8 seconds. A smaller winning margin for Vingegaard and I will throw tantrums to the end of time.
 
Some great legwork DE.

One thing I'm missing is the net elevation gain/km, which you can easily derive from these, but iMO is still more useful than some of the metrics here.

But given we speak about average speed, I think steep uphills depress average speed the most. Technicality get much more difficult to define.
Here you go. Take the km and % above 10% with a grain of salt as it’s collated from a variety of sources.

RaceDistanceElevation gainElevation gain/kmElevation lossNet elevation gain/kmKms above 10%% above 10%Average speed of winner
Giro d'Italia 2019, stage 934,872320,775862077718,563218390,82,29885057540,3
TT Worlds 20173166121,3225806535010,032258061,85,80645161341,6
Paris-Nice 2017, stage 414,533322,9655172418110,482758621,17,58620689740,2
Itzulia 2014, stage 625,966425,63706564666-0,077220077220040,3
Tour de France 2020, stage 2036,296226,5745856421420,662983433,39,11602209938,8
Tour de Suisse 2021, stage 723,265428,189655176310,99137931030,31,29310344838,6
Tour de France 2023, stage 1622,463628,3928571424217,5892857128,928571429??
Itzulia 2015, stage 618,352228,52459016680-8,6338797811,910,3825136638,2
Tour de Pologne 2022, stage 611,833728,559322034324,915254240,21,69491525440,1
Tour de France 2013, stage 173292628,93758532,281251,34,062537,2
Tour de Suisse 2013, stage 926,897636,4179104510632,462686574,717,5373134331
Itzulia 2016, stage 616,562838,060606066150,78787878792,816,9696969733,9
Tour de France 2016, stage 181767639,7647058813032,117647061,911,1764705933,2
 
Whether he attacks or not, it would be ridiculous for the GC to be decided based on Bonus seconds in the last couple stages.

Could you imagine JV up by 7 seconds and Bonusgacar sprinting to the line 4" ahead of JV to win by 1" from the 4" bonus? Lmao at how silly that would be.

Let's just please have someone grab the win rather than something ridiculous like Bonus seconds deciding this.
Agreed. I really want one of them to put some decent time into the other in one of the remaining road stages.
 
27 kph? Seems too much.
They did Domancy in 6 minutes and 40 seconds at 7.4 W/kg when Jumbo shredded the peloton there in the early stages of the final stage of the 2020 Dauphiné, then as I mentioned upthread Dumoulin was the fastest on the section from Domancy to Combloux in 2016 at 7 minutes and 7 seconds. That would be 13:47 for 6 kilometres, or 26.1 km/h… and I’d expect Pogacar and Vingegaard to go a little faster on the second section. If 27 km/h is too high, it won’t be by much. 50 km/h on the part before it, otoh, is impossible with the steep hill in it.
 
Last edited:
Whether he attacks or not, it would be ridiculous for the GC to be decided based on Bonus seconds in the last couple stages.

Could you imagine JV up by 7 seconds and Bonusgacar sprinting to the line 4" ahead of JV to win by 1" from the 4" bonus? Lmao at how silly that would be.

Let's just please have someone grab the win rather than something ridiculous like Bonus seconds deciding this.
It would be silly and I hope it doesn't happen. But I also think it would be kind of silly, and unfortunate although not unprecedented, to have a GT winner who may not win a single stage.

Crossing the line first is good!
 
The concept of "gaps" entails the concept of a finish line that riders have in view in order to gap. It's hence fair to reward who gets there first as this amounts to be better even without any gap towards other contenders. Without bonus seconds you could have at the limit a tied Tour. There's really no point in going against bonus seconds without a nostalgic argument ("back in the day") or a performance argument ("real riders drop other riders").