I wonder if MVDP will make an effort tomorrow. He was 5th in the 27km TT that some have compared to this one, but didn't put in much of an effort in last year's TDF TT. In 2021 he was battling for the yellow jersey.
Last edited:
The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
Yeah, but we should also consider the shape of everyone. Landa was clearly not at his best at Dauphiné and Remco is always flying in TT, but I hope he lose max 1:30 tomorrow.True, bit of an exaggeration. He lost 2:38 in Dauphine which was 34km’s, but with more vertical meters. So let’s say 1:45-2:00
Pogacar has/had the perfect conditions to do the double.For 20 years we have heard about the difficulty/impossibility of the Giro/Tour double.
And yet everyone expects Pogi to smash this TT
Something rotten in the state of Slovenia
This...L'épreuve de vérité. Yes it is.
I hope the next French Tour de France winner happens in my lifetime.This...
First thing, this stage is HUGE for Remco. If he wants to be relevant for the win (and that's the expectation for a generational rider like him), he can't lose and find himself over a minute behind Pogacar...he needs to make his gains where he can: Go Remco!
Jonas has the excuse of the long layoff, him losing Le Tour would not be the end, but this stage is HUGe (not HUGE like Remco), he's a two-time and reigning Champion. We take him lightly but I would not be surprised if he wins.
HUge for Roglic, stay alive against the other three. That's his chance to assert himself into the discussion.
Huge for Pogacar who can repeat the Giro scenario. He can make is buffer very chubby indeed...
huge for Carapaz, his road to a podium has to start here.
uge for Rodriguez: a top-5 in Nice with this field would be a great accomplishment. And for Martin too: he's not 8th yet, so he can't afford a bad day. The same goes for Landa, and no he won't lose three minutes...about two...
ge: the doms trying to stay alive for three weeks in the top-10 chase while helping a leader will want to benefit without looking like they are not entirely committed to the team: Juan, Matteo, and of course Joao. Also, can Simon pull a rabbit out of his bike? It would be nice...
e: and that should be an E- for David Gaudu. What is happening? I'm gutted...he's not The New Pinot... (expletive)
huge for Carapaz, his road to a podium has to start here.
And Evenepoel beat Pogacar in that same WCC ITT by over 3 minutes.Giro stage 7, hilly ITT, Pogi beat Ganna by 16 seconds in 40.6km
World ITT last year, slightly hilly ITT, Evenepoel beat Ganna by 12 seconds in 47.8km
You'd expect Ganna be in good form for both. Pogi is in better form now than the Giro and Evenepoel is in better form now than last year. In a shorter TT, I expect it will favour Pogi. Pogi will win this stage not Evenepoel
Pogi didn't target the WCITT.And Evenepoel beat Pogacar in that same WCC ITT by over 3 minutes.
We've seen Evenepoel in the Dauphiné. He comfortably beat everyone in the TT. And then we saw him struggle in the mountains, getting his ass handed to him by worldbeaters like Jorgenson and Gee. Meaning he was not even close to his best and it wasn't just his weight that was off (the last MTF he was a lot better than the first MTF, both followed after the TT and he sure as f* didn't lose his 2.5kg in those 2 days). So far this week he has looked like the best version of himself and i think he will be 2 levels above his Dauphiné TT. If Pog can beat him, then he needs to start taking the WCC ITT seriously because then he can win that as well.
You say shorter TT's favor Pogacar, but he lost the shorter flatter TT in the Giro to Ganna by half a minute, it was the longer one he won. Evenepoel crushed Ganna in the 19k opening TT in last year's Giro by 22s if you are eager to look for references.
Can Pog beat Evenepoel, i think it's not out of the question, but imho it's rather unlikely and the evidence to suggest otherwise is flimsy at best.
Errrr... i know. Did you even read what i wrote?Pogi didn't target the WCITT.
Pogi and Jonas have both done their best ITT in GTs.Errrr... i know. Did you even read what i wrote?
If Pog can beat him, then he needs to start taking the WCC ITT seriously because then he can win that as well.
Yes? I know?Pogi and Jonas have both done their best ITT in GTs.
That I agree with. But in the Giro, it was the second ITT and Pogi should be more fatigue than Ganna.Yes? I know?
If you are referring to my comment about him losing 3 minutes in the WCC to Evenepoel, the point was that you can not use that as a reference. Because while Pog's TT's in a GT are better because 1/ he targets them and 2/ he has superior recovery during a GT compared to "non GC time trialists"... the opposite goes for Ganna. He does target the WCC over all other TT's and he does not have the advantage during a GT because he does not have the recovery of a GC rider. Meaning the entire comparison falls flat, because you can not compare Ganna in the middle of the Giro to Ganna during the WCC. In other words, Evenepoel beat the best Ganna during the WCC, Pogacar did not beat the best Ganna during the Giro.
Thing is that the GC riders have less fatigue further in the race compared to others. That’s why WVA in perfect condition loses TT’s during GT’sThat I agree with. But in the Giro, it was the second ITT and Pogi should be more fatigue than Ganna.
A non GC rider usually has worse recovery during a GT than a GC rider even if he can chose to take it easier certain days. They also prepare completely different towards a GT. But a lot depends on circumstances. Did Ganna have to work for the team a lot, or was he able to take it easy all week. Was it a hard stage or an easy stage before the TT. Those kinds of things make it even harder to compare the result of a GC rider to a TT specialist (who is not a GC rider).That I agree with. But in the Giro, it was the second ITT and Pogi should be more fatigue than Ganna.
Non GC rider don't go full gas where GC rider do.Thing is that the GC riders have less fatigue further in the race compared to others. That’s why WVA in perfect condition loses TT’s during GT’s
I agree with that. When Ganna lost the first ITT, maybe he got a free pass target the second in best shape possible. INEOS needed that win.A non GC rider usually has worse recovery during a GT than a GC rider even if he can chose to take it easier certain days. They also prepare completely different towards a GT. But a lot depends on circumstances. Did Ganna have to work for the team a lot, or was he able to take it easy all week. Was it a hard stage or an easy stage before the TT. Those kinds of things make it even harder to compare the result of a GC rider to a TT specialist (who is not a GC rider).
I know, but that doesn’t mean they don’t have a lot of fatigue. Non GC riders just get tired more quickly. How else can you explain GC riders that never rode podium in a WC ITT or don’t put in that good efforts during TT’s in 1-week stage races, suddenly win by a big margin a TT in a GT?Non GC rider don't go full gas where GC rider do.
Jonas, for example, is only I'm top shape at the Tour. It's the races they target that's matter.I know, but that doesn’t mean they don’t have a lot of fatigue. Non GC riders just get tired more quickly. How else can you explain GC riders that never rode podium in a WC ITT or don’t put in that good efforts during TT’s in 1-week stage races, suddenly win by a big margin a TT in a GT?
Take for example Vingegaard. He wouldn’t win a WC ITT ever, even though he destroyed everyone last year in the TDF.
Küng to me is no outer top10 candidate, but a pure top5 candidateI think WVA and Kung can make it as well. What about Wærenskjold?