Tour de Pologne 2020

Page 4 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Nov 16, 2013
26,686
27,791
28,180
Also finishing this flat race with a descending false flat is definitely NOT a good idea.

Definitely true. I wonder why they kept it in the race, considering Lambrecht last year. I know his death had nothing to do with the Katowice sprint but that has just been a disaster waiting to happen.
 
May 4, 2014
1,155
103
10,680
Ok that was ridiculous. We still need to make a distinction between the severity of the move and the severity of the effects I think. Of course it was a bad move, but it's made to look worse because of its effects.
 
View: https://twitter.com/PatLefevere/status/1291048689226723329


Ok that was ridiculous. We still need to make a distinction between the severity of the move and the severity of the effects I think. Of course it was a bad move, but it's made to look worse because of its effects.
***. These guys are going 80km/u. The move is the effect.

They say, Jakobsen is conscious but bleeding. I honestly thought he would die.
They said the same about Lambrecht. Let's hope this time will be different.
 
  • Wow
Reactions: Sandisfan
Oct 1, 2015
817
591
11,580
Also finishing this flat race with a descending false flat is definitely NOT a good idea.

They even broke record in sprint speed couple of years ago if I remember it correctly.

Anyway I did not see it and I think I dont want to. Hope everybody involved is allright ( not severe injuries at least).
 
Jan 26, 2012
313
9
9,295
I'm from Poland and my friend is close to the finish line, they say lot of blood in the place of the crash and ambulances on sirens are going from the place of the crash to the hospitals
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sandisfan
Jun 24, 2017
1,619
320
11,180
Ok that was ridiculous. We still need to make a distinction between the severity of the move and the severity of the effects I think. Of course it was a bad move, but it's made to look worse because of its effects.
Or maybe we should judge moves by the potential severity of their effects and start punishing erratic/dangerous behaviour in sprints much more severely, regardless of their outcome.
 
May 4, 2014
1,155
103
10,680
Or maybe we should judge moves by the potential severity of their effects and start punishing erratic/dangerous behaviour in sprints much more severely, regardless of their outcome.
Sure, exactly. That way, you judge the action rather than the effect, which will lead to more consistency I think.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sandisfan
Jan 4, 2011
6,229
241
17,880
They say, Jakobsen is conscious but bleeding. I honestly thought he would die.

Injury wise, I think it looked more spectacular than it was for Jakobsen. An important part of the impact was damped by the barrier before he hit anything. And the helmet probably did its job too.

That spectator on the other hand was simply hit full on on the upper body/head. Scary.
 
Aug 18, 2010
11,435
3,594
28,180
The finish has been there for 10 years and nothing happened. The sprints can be dangerous whether it's downhill or flat.

the issue is not that a downhill sprint is more likely to create crashes, but that it is very likely increases the damage done if there is a crash. Top speed today was likely 20kmh higher than many bunch sprints. That’s not really desirable.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hihope and sworks
May 4, 2014
1,155
103
10,680
Injury wise, I think it looked more spectacular than it was for Jakobsen. An important part of the impact was damped by the barrier before he hit anything. And the helmet probably did its job too.

That spectator on the other hand was simply hit full on on the upper body/head. Scary.
Yeah initially I thought he directly impacted the finish 'arc'. I was relieved a bit when I was him tumble across the barrier first, as weird as it feels to say that.
 
  • Wow
Reactions: Sandisfan

TRENDING THREADS