Vroome.exe said:Gaviria outsprinting sagan with ease...
Guybrush said:Koning
Gav
Sepulveda?
Sagan
also in this group: Nibs, Quintana
behind: Talansky
Valv.Piti said:Who is Koning?
Alexandre B. said:Vroome.exe said:Gaviria outsprinting sagan with ease...
The context is important to explain his performance.
Lexman said:are there two Richeze's?
Talansky arrived in the main group. Am I missing something?Valv.Piti said:Guybrush said:Koning
Gav
Sepulveda?
Sagan
also in this group: Nibs, Quintana
behind: Talansky
I know San Luis is the first race and all, but Talansky has to be one of the most overrated cyclists in the peloton. Cannondale would be stupid to put their eggs in him for a top-10 in the Tour. Much rather support Rolland
I'm confused. I didn't see the race but Talansky is listed in the main group. Why are people bagging on him instead of the people I don't see there - Diaz, Majka, Sepulveda, Acevedo, Soler, Peraud, etc...Valv.Piti said:Guybrush said:Koning
Gav
Sepulveda?
Sagan
also in this group: Nibs, Quintana
behind: Talansky
I know San Luis is the first race and all, but Talansky has to be one of the most overrated cyclists in the peloton. Cannondale would be stupid to put their eggs in him for a top-10 in the Tour. Much rather support Rolland
Escarabajo said:Talansky arrived in the main group. Am I missing something?Valv.Piti said:Guybrush said:Koning
Gav
Sepulveda?
Sagan
also in this group: Nibs, Quintana
behind: Talansky
I know San Luis is the first race and all, but Talansky has to be one of the most overrated cyclists in the peloton. Cannondale would be stupid to put their eggs in him for a top-10 in the Tour. Much rather support Rolland
Valv.Piti said:Escarabajo said:Talansky arrived in the main group. Am I missing something?Valv.Piti said:Guybrush said:Koning
Gav
Sepulveda?
Sagan
also in this group: Nibs, Quintana
behind: Talansky
I know San Luis is the first race and all, but Talansky has to be one of the most overrated cyclists in the peloton. Cannondale would be stupid to put their eggs in him for a top-10 in the Tour. Much rather support Rolland
I think you should direct that question to the first poster who wrote that Talansky was behind. I guess he wasnt then
The fact that he indeed arrived in the front group doesnt really change the narrative, Im not a big fan of Talansky at all and would be very surprised to see him do well in the Tour.
Anderis said:I can't see how Talansky can be anywhere near being the most overrated rider. Nobody hypes him for GT wins, even podiums in any big races. And in the group of riders who are not hyped for those kind of results, his palmares are among the best.
- He finished 7th in Vuelta as an u-25 rider despite no support from his team, TTT loses etc. Consistently among 5-6 best climbers in the last week.
- He finished 10th in the Tour as an u-25 rider. He gained time through breakaway, but again, he was definetely among top10 climbers in the last week again.
- He won Dauphine thanks to the breakaway, but even without this breakaway his performance was impressive, top3 climber in the race and quite close to Contador.
- He has proven he is definetely a top3 material in the biggest one-week races. Apart from his Dauphine win, he has 2nd places in Paris-Nice (with stage win) and Romandie. In 2012 Romandie he was closer to beat Wiggins in ITT than any other rider in the whole season in any other ITT that was longer than 10 kms/
There are riders out there who, unlike Talansky, are hyped as future GT or monument winners and who will never eclipse his achievements, I'm sure. There's little merit in calling Talansky one of the most overrated riders IMO.
Valv.Piti said:He has been hyped the two last seasons to top-10, even top-5 in the Tour which he hasnt even come close to both times. I know there are other races, but its the big one and its there where Talansky and all the other big guns aim to peak. I havent said it in here, but I have ALWAYS opposed that Talansky was a legit GC rider for the Tour and I think Garmin has done that as well by now. To me, he just doesnt seem to have that elite level to climb with the best, or even second best, when everyone is at 100%. He is a good rider in one week stage races, that I agree with, but I have always seen Dan Martin with the much higher ceiling GC-wise despite him crashing at every second race.
Maybe Im a little harsh on Talansky, but thats just how I feel.