Of course. I just wanted to point out that there can be another reason to know when you are giving birth in advance, aside from a scheduled c-section.Yes, but that is also a medical reason.
The Cycling News forum is looking to add some volunteer moderators with Red Rick's recent retirement. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
Of course. I just wanted to point out that there can be another reason to know when you are giving birth in advance, aside from a scheduled c-section.Yes, but that is also a medical reason.
This thread has been something else today!Of course. I just wanted to point out that there can be another reason to know when you are giving birth in advance, aside from a scheduled c-section.
Lol...where, at bet365?
And they had Froome at 40/1 just a couple of weeks ago still
This thread has been something else today!
At least we were talking about the actual upcoming birth of an actual child! Yesterday we were talking about Conca's fictional twins, or maybe it was quadruplets, that he might have had when he was 18... if they were actually real, which I'm pretty sure they aren't...
I think weirdest thing was BlueRoads thinking he couldn't have had children before turning 18
I never said that! I was trying to be sensible!
I never said that! I was trying to be sensible!
????Carapaz saved by good pacing. Uran will either pay tomorrow for this show or he can shake hands with Padun...
I am not sure how many attacks have Uran made in his life. But he could try at least.Well it was a very special time trial with many factors coming into play so any result is probably "normal" here.
I would have thought Fuglsang with his climbing legs, descent skills and some weight for the fast downhill sections should have ruled it, but if he had bad legs today...
Nice to see Carapaz in yellow aga- no, wait. This jersey should go to the worst rider, as a punishment. Give him back a decent jersey.
I don't think Uran can take the jersey from Carapaz tomorrow, despite this performance today.
Oh no, we will be able to compare it tomorrow. I believe Uran will pay for this outstanding performance.????
Comparing Padum to Uran is mindboggling IMHO!
I'm not sure I agree. I think his win in the 2014 Giro TT was more impressive than this. Both came fairly unexpected though.The more I think about it, the more I'm starting to realise how phenomenal that Uran's performance was. Of course you have Pogačar's PdbF, but this has to be right behind that one, if we are looking at ITTs let's say in the last decade.
The “strength of opposition” argument is valid in pretty much any competition outside of the Tour itself, but you can only beat whoever’s on the road with you, and Rigo smashed ‘em. When we look at TT performances from GC contenders this season, it’s definitely one of the good ones.Am I the only one who doesn't think this was very spectacular from Uran? I mean, very, very good, surely, but it was so very special, dependent on your bike choice, on your descending skills, your pacing strategy... whether you just got everything right... I mean the climbers did well here, he's a good climber... it was a very steady climb, wasn't it? and he's a steady climber... also a very good descender... the competition is not that stiff... surely, Dumoulin, but Dumoulin only just came back to racing. Alaphilippe is quite a decent tter but not the best and he got second.
If I have the right time splits he took 12 seconds on Alaphilippe on the climb? And Ala lost most of the time on the descent which also featured a straight part (with the tunnel), where he didn't have a tt bike -?
Without guys like Roglic or van Aert here I miss the comparison to those who should be best here.
So, what I want to say, I'm not sure how much you can actually take from this stage, apart from the fact that Uran's in very good form. I expect tomorrow to be more telling?
The “strength of opposition” argument is valid in pretty much any competition outside of the Tour itself, but you can only beat whoever’s on the road with you, and Rigo smashed ‘em. When we look at TT performances from GC contenders this season, it’s definitely one of the good ones.
Of course, it’s not 100% relevant to the Tour, with 2 flat TTs. And it could be a one-off, but if it is, it’s a very good one-off.
I'm not sure I agree. I think his win in the 2014 Giro TT was more impressive than this. Both came fairly unexpected though.
After thinking about it some more (LOL), I think I agree with both. Maybe I was exaggerating a bit there. It was obviously a stellar performance, but sure, some top contenders were missing. Van Aert, Roglič, Thomas, Porte, Remco, Pogačar, Almeida, McNulty, Foss, even Cavagna and Bernal, all should do well on this type of ITT and all were missing. Having said that, I still believe it wouldn't have been easy to beat Rigo's time for anyone of the above mentioned riders.Am I the only one who doesn't think this was very spectacular from Uran? I mean, very, very good, surely, but it was so very special, dependent on your bike choice, on your descending skills, your pacing strategy... whether you just got everything right... I mean the climbers did well here, he's a good climber... it was a very steady climb, wasn't it? and he's a steady climber... also a very good descender... the competition is not that stiff... surely, Dumoulin, but Dumoulin only just came back to racing. Alaphilippe is quite a decent tter but not the best and he got second.
If I have the right time splits he took 12 seconds on Alaphilippe on the climb? And Ala lost most of the time on the descent which also featured a straight part (with the tunnel), where he didn't have a tt bike -?
Without guys like Roglic or van Aert here I miss the comparison to those who should be best here.
So, what I want to say, I'm not sure how much you can actually take from this stage, apart from the fact that Uran's in very good form. I expect tomorrow to be more telling?
After thinking about it some more (LOL), I think I agree with both. Maybe I was exaggerating a bit there. It was obviously a stellar performance, but sure, some top contenders were missing. Van Aert, Roglič, Thomas, Porte, Remco, Pogačar, Almeida, McNulty, Foss, even Cavagna and Bernal, all should do well on this type of ITT and all were missing. Having said that, I still believe it wouldn't have been easy to beat Rigo's time for anyone of the above mentioned riders.
Am I the only one who doesn't think this was very spectacular from Uran? I mean, very, very good, surely, but it was so very special, dependent on your bike choice, on your descending skills, your pacing strategy... whether you just got everything right... I mean the climbers did well here, he's a good climber... it was a very steady climb, wasn't it? and he's a steady climber... also a very good descender... the competition is not that stiff... surely, Dumoulin, but Dumoulin only just came back to racing. Alaphilippe is quite a decent tter but not the best and he got second.
If I have the right time splits he took 12 seconds on Alaphilippe on the climb? And Ala lost most of the time on the descent which also featured a straight part (with the tunnel), where he didn't have a tt bike -?
Without guys like Roglic or van Aert here I miss the comparison to those who should be best here.
So, what I want to say, I'm not sure how much you can actually take from this stage, apart from the fact that Uran's in very good form. I expect tomorrow to be more telling?
Are we name checking everyone who ever won a WT TT stage here? I want to know what time Chad Haga would’ve laid down on that course, and I won’t recognize Rigo’s win until we find out.Also missing was Lutsenko.
Are we name checking everyone who ever won a WT TT stage here? I want to know what time Chad Haga would’ve laid down on that course, and I won’t recognize Rigo’s win until we find out.