- Aug 28, 2012
- 4,250
- 51
- 15,580
Re: Re:
[ote="[url=http://forum.cyclingnews.com/viewtopic.php?p=2125771#p2125771]Brullnux[/url]"]
Why didn't they sign him? Sponsors wanting a British rider, I imagine, as Contador in 2010 was a far more attractive proposition than Wiggins was. Or was it money? Or just the Brailsford ethos?[/quote]
Couldn't get him out of his Astana deal.
[ote="[url=http://forum.cyclingnews.com/viewtopic.php?p=2125771#p2125771]Brullnux[/url]"]
You're probably right. There wouldn't have been the improbable transformations, maybe the marginal gains stuff would have been toned down and the riding would be more aggressive (you'd hope) with a rider like Contador.pastronef said:LaFlorecita said:I know that. Dodged a bullet, he would have ended up like EBH.MatParker117 said:LaFlorecita said:Go wash your mouth outdeValtos said:I heard Sky were looking to sign Contador ...![]()
They had brief talks prior to Sky signing Wiggins.
think for a moment about this, if Sky signed Alberto from 2010, the view we all have on Team Sky would be completely different. in 2010 the vitriol wasnt there yet. the minds werent still bugged with the Sky-problem.
things would have been very different. so very different.
dont think about Contador signing for Sky 7 years ago at the beginning of Sky in 2010, with the sky-bugged mind of the last 4-5 years
Why didn't they sign him? Sponsors wanting a British rider, I imagine, as Contador in 2010 was a far more attractive proposition than Wiggins was. Or was it money? Or just the Brailsford ethos?[/quote]
Couldn't get him out of his Astana deal.
