Benotti69 said:
to some drinking an alcoholic drink is abuse to others it needs to be class A drugs. PED use is abuse in my opinion for those in professional sports.
Cheers could not remember his name. The OP did mention EPO, HGH and PEDs and while amphetamines are not exactly a PED more a RED (recovery enhancement drug).
Firstly, I think we are almost talking past each other at this stage.
You appear to mention many of the distinctions but not spot those differences.
As an example - Pk & Chappuis (Sp) both did much the same PEDs, why did one go on to a successful career and the other started drinking and abusing drugs?
Because PK had a wife to go home to and the associated responsibilities.
Andres left the peloton and was lost - no family, no potential prospects that gave him what being part of the bubble that is pro sport.
Sadly, it happens many athletes in many sports - irrespective of whether they did PEDs or not.
Benotti69 said:
i dont see it like that because when i was a teenager and those athletes who around me were serious about their sport would never consider the recreational drugs never mind the PEDs, but maybe i am an old git and things have changed.
Where i came from lots of very talented kids took the teenage rebellious road instead of hard work and training forfeiting possible sporting careers
Again - this makes a good example.
Those athletes might never consider using rec drugs - but may have no problem using PEDs.
Why? Because they may consider rec drugs as harmful, while seeing that PEDs are beneficial.
Also - you mentioned this was in your teens. How many of those who started rec drug use still do?