Statute of limitations overruled this week in another case:
In relation to USADA’s vow to dig deeper, the question will naturally be raised as to how far back it will be able to delve and to penalise if it does feel that rules were broken.
Although a statute of limitations of eight years normally applies under the WADA Code, USADA issued a ruling yesterday in relation to the track and field athlete Eddy Hellebuyck which extended further back than this.
He tested positive for EPO in 2004 and served a two year suspension. However information received recently plus his own statements led USADA to conclude that his doping extended back to 2001.
He argued that the statue of limitations prevented further penalty, but the American Arbitration Association (AAA) panel concluded that his previous denials meant this was not the case.
“We are pleased the Panel has upheld the fundamental principle of fairness for clean athletes,” stated Tygart yesterday. “This decision sends a clear message that you can’t use performance enhancing drugs to cheat, conceal your violations, and when the truth is revealed, attempt to hide behind the statute of limitations.”
That ruling may prove relevant in USADA’s ability to fully investigate the USPS team. As for federal agents, though, it appears their delving has come to an end. The various factors in this decision will presumably emerge in time.