frenchfry said:Obviously he hasn't given up, he is just fighting where he has always had the advantage up to now. The volume of intern generated comments is boggling, the only positive is that most of them are so obvious and over the top that a reasonable reader must be able to see through the charade.
Overall, from what I have seen, the press has been pretty objective and isn't giving Armstrong a lot of credibility. From linked articles found on this thread there are some containing pretty scathing attacks on Wonder-boy. On French radio they are already pointing out that his arbitration refusal was a calculated ploy to ensure the truth doesn't get out and that the jurisdiction issue is only a pretext.
His image, already damaged, must be taking a huge hit even if the fanboys and interns clog up the media. I wonder if even he had calculated the intensity of the reaction.
Dr. Maserati said:My apologies - they had more than 2 choices, if that makes you happy -they chose the lying, doper, fraud option.
Those that don't care - don't care.
Those that read the headlines see Armstrong did not contest having all Tour stripped - and the details will eventually be exposed, starting with Tyler next month.
alberto.legstrong said:That article sums it all up really nicely.
Benotti69 said:Doesn't say much for the interns at liestrong when they think they are going to work on helping cancer awareness and find themsleves posting in comment section and forums all day!
Maxiton said:
RichWalk said:It does, good to see Yank journos being so candid, the comments as usual are pure comedy![]()
TubularBills said:Washington Post Poll,
Poll: Is Lance Armstrong guilty of doping?
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/early-lead/post/poll-is-lance-armstrong-guilty-of-doping/2012/08/24/d7733ce6-eded-11e1-afd6-f55f84bc0c41_blog.html
Everyone here needs to vote!
therealtimshady said:As much as I don't like lance and believe he doped I think kimmage is an idiot as well, The only time I have ever agreed with lance was about his comment about the use of the word cancer - it was out of order, just calling lance a liar and a cheat would have been sufficient
Susan Westemeyer said:LIfetime ban as of August 1, 1998, all results since then DQed.
Susan
alberto.legstrong said:La Florecita.
MajorTom said:
Carols said:And they have this poll.....can't even pick an answer
Poll: Is Lance Armstrong's legacy tarnished by USADA action?
No, he always tested clean
Possibly, but he deserves his day in court
Somewhat, in part because he's giving up
Yes, it appears most cyclists were dirty
TheEnoculator said:Guys, don't be depressed that the majority of the population is still behind this sad excuse for a fraud.
Unlike us real cycling fans, most people had been brainwashed by Armstrong's relentless cancer campaign and his larger-than-life Tour de France champion promotions. Most people believe he was really clean because they thought cycling's doping tests were 100% fool-proof and without any understanding of the sport and its past, it's hard for the mass to believe otherwise. Armstrong has successfully turned himself into a cult. Pretty darn hard to do if you ask me, but he did it. So when he played the witch-hunt sympathy card and said he gave up, his fans flocked to him and said, "you've been brave enough all your life, it's OK, we'll speak for you now." Armstrong's influence is simply unprecedented in the history of sports.
I feel sorry for those who believe his innocence. Because these people don't go out and look for the facts themselves and just believe everything Armstrong says because they are so brainwashed. I know what I believe and when I talk to the real cycling fans, we are on the exact same page. That's good enough.
TheEnoculator said:Guys, don't be depressed that the majority of the population is still behind this sad excuse for a fraud.
Unlike us real cycling fans, most people had been brainwashed by Armstrong's relentless cancer campaign and his larger-than-life Tour de France champion promotions. Most people believe he was really clean because they thought cycling's doping tests were 100% fool-proof and without any understanding of the sport and its past, it's hard for the mass to believe otherwise. Armstrong has successfully turned himself into a cult. Pretty darn hard to do if you ask me, but he did it. So when he played the witch-hunt sympathy card and said he gave up, his fans flocked to him and said, "you've been brave enough all your life, it's OK, we'll speak for you now." Armstrong's influence is simply unprecedented in the history of sports.
I feel sorry for those who believe his innocence. Because these people don't go out and look for the facts themselves and just believe everything Armstrong says because they are so brainwashed. I know what I believe and when I talk to the real cycling fans, we are on the exact same page. That's good enough.