Vincenzo Nibali

Page 40 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Well if Nibali is doping now he must have been doping in the 2013 Giro too. He is 29 so getting into his optimal age as a GC rider. So however strong he was last season he logically should be a little stronger now. With AC and Froome gone the remaining competition is not very strong so a 7 minute lead is no surprise to me.

Plus riders peak for races. The TdF was Nibali's key objective this year. Dauphine and Romandie were just training. Then he's had an altitude camp since Dauphine. It is logical he is much stronger now than earlier in the season.

If AC and Froome were still in the race I think Nibs would still have at least 60 sec lead from the cobbled stage. He does not look like he has ridden to his limit with the remaining competition. Maybe this is the thing that makes his performance most suspicious?
 
roundabout said:
Nibali has a 5th in Romandie as the best stage result pre-Tour this year

Pretty sure that makes him a second-tier rider.

second-tier riders win the Giro?

actually, i can think of a couple third-tier riders winning the Tour in recent memory, so you might be right.
 
Cookster15 said:
... He does not look like he has ridden to his limit with the remaining competition. Maybe this is the thing that makes his performance most suspicious?

http://veloclinic.tumblr.com/post/92742793478/stage-18-2014-tour-de-france-preliminary-performance

He's put on a show with an enormous display of power. Meanwhile, other GC contenders come in pretty sane. Even Valverde!

http://veloclinic.tumblr.com/post/92744402538/preliminary-comparison-2014-vs-2013-tour-de-france

If I'm reading that graphs from the last link right, a 2013 Sky would have soundly beaten him this year.
 
luckyboy said:
None of those guys are normally anywhere near Nibali though. Its not like he's smashing Contador and Quintana, he's beating second-tier riders.

Exactly!!! Some folks are making him out to be unstoppable, and this amazing rider. He's been lucky throughout this tour so far IMO. All the big names are either gone, or haven't entered. So, he's been able to take advantage of it. I really think(and still say) had Cadel rode the tour, he'd probably be leading it right now. I'll give him some credit, he's been able to fend off people, but hasn't had any real challengers so far. If Contador and the gang were still in there, I think it'd be a different race.
 
May 26, 2010
28,143
5
0
@ammattipyoraily: #TDF, Hautacam (13.33 km)
Vincenzo Nibali
2008: 41:12
2014: 37:20

9% improvement from 24 to 30

9% is a big improvement from aged 24. Too much to be au natural....
 
SeriousSam said:
The Cadel of 2014? Come one now. That's ridiculous.

How/why is it ridiculous? taking into account that all the other serious threats to win are now gone, say Cadel rode it....don't you think he'd have a pretty good chance of winning? You're basing this on what Cadel did last year or the year before...not taking into account that the top guys are all out right now, THIS year. That would've given him a good chance of winning IMO, and even against Nibali, who's only winning because of what I said above IMO.
 
Jun 27, 2013
44
0
0
86TDFWinner said:
How/why is it ridiculous? taking into account that all the other serious threats to win are now gone, say Cadel rode it....don't you think he'd have a pretty good chance of winning? You're basing this on what Cadel did last year or the year before...not taking into account that the top guys are all out right now, THIS year. That would've given him a good chance of winning IMO, and even against Nibali, who's only winning because of what I said above IMO.

And how do you think Wiggins would be doing?

I ask partly out of jest, but also because I'm genuinely interested in your opinion.
 
May 26, 2009
4,114
0
0
Benotti69 said:
9% is a big improvement from aged 24. Too much to be au natural....

Classic fan boy replies:

1)Tailwind.

2)Shorter/easier route this time

3)Less climbs this time

and so on........

:D
 
Jun 27, 2013
44
0
0
Benotti69 said:
9% is a big improvement from aged 24. Too much to be au natural....

Out of interest, what's realistic? Imagine there must be some interesting studies out there on this?
 
Jul 30, 2009
1,735
0
0
jens_attacks said:
do keep in mind that in 1994 and in 1996, there wasn't a single climb on the route;) just hautacam
i think lance in 2000 just with hautacam on the route could have beaten bjarne or very close. just like nibali would have went around 36 minutes today.
unfortunately, these days, aso, at libertine seguro's orders:p, decided to never use a ______________/ mtf stage. those are the best:D

I wish there was a LIKE button on this forum :)
 
86TDFWinner said:
How/why is it ridiculous? taking into account that all the other serious threats to win are now gone, say Cadel rode it....don't you think he'd have a pretty good chance of winning? You're basing this on what Cadel did last year or the year before...not taking into account that the top guys are all out right now, THIS year. That would've given him a good chance of winning IMO, and even against Nibali, who's only winning because of what I said above IMO.

Evans was destroyed by Nibali in the 2013 Giro.
It's beyond me how he could stand a chance against him now that he's older and clearly declining.

@Benotti: interesting comparison. Taking Netserk remark into account, what kind of improvement should be realistically expected? Does that suggest he wasn't a doper in 2008 or that he just stepped up his game?
 
Jul 30, 2009
1,735
0
0
broken chain said:
He looks fresh as a daisy.Might even be holding back a tad.

I thought he made an effort at looking tired today. Even so he still looks like he just gave it 95% at the Wobbly Wheelers 10.

the race behind him is massive fun though - best Tour for entertainment since 2007 for me
 
SafeBet said:
@Benotti: interesting comparison. Taking Netserk remark into account, what kind of improvement should be realistically expected? Does that suggest he wasn't a doper in 2008 or that he just stepped up his game?

Full throttle team-wide doping program in 2007, passport slows him from 2008 onwards (which is why he was faster on Zonc in '07 than both '10 and '11), joins Astana and goes from a good program to a top notch program. Probably doped since junior (certainly wouldn't surprise me, then again maybe he first started when he got pro).
 
Netserk said:
Full throttle team-wide doping program in 2007, passport slows him from 2008 onwards (which is why he was faster on Zonc in '07 than both '10 and '11), joins Astana and goes from a good program to a top notch program. Probably doped since junior (certainly wouldn't surprise me, then again maybe he first started when he got pro).

That's such a prosaically depressing summary of a career and sport. I'd like to think it's lazy cynicism, but maybe that just makes me a naive fool.

One thing for sure, if Conti and Froome had stayed upright this might have been the most entertaining tour for a while.
 
RownhamHill said:
That's such a prosaically depressing summary of a career and sport. I'd like to think it's lazy cynicism, but maybe that just makes me a naive fool.

One thing for sure, if Conti and Froome had stayed upright this might have been the most entertaining tour for a while.
What's depressing about it? I love Nibali :)
 
SafeBet said:
Evans was destroyed by Nibali in the 2013 Giro.
It's beyond me how he could stand a chance against him now that he's older and clearly declining.

Froome/Contador and a few others would probably be demolishing Nibali now if they were still in the race, what's your point?

My point was/is, that Cadel could've have also had a chance to win, had he been in it. never said he'd 100% surely win, but that he'd have a chance to win it, as much of a chance as Nibali did at the start. We'll never know though will we? Just because one rider gets crushed in a different race, doesn't mean he gets crushed in every race. Just my opinion of course.