Vincenzo Nibali

Page 5 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Apr 20, 2012
6,320
0
0
DirtyWorks said:
But, but.... But.... BroDeal, that's not proof! That's stringing random facts together into another conspiracy theory. We need proof. And no, I won't tell you what kind of proof. I get to make that up while I pretend 2013 is the cleanest peloton ever.:D
Thats the spirit!

Split times of today:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0Ao5-isr01pbpdE5rakZjYU81ZjNDSGNLQ215SThjMVE#gid=0

What is interesting is the non - tri bars at Sanchez and Betancourt.

And then this one:
BK9X9OTCYAA3tVY.jpg:large


A Moser special in the TT?
 
May 15, 2011
45,171
617
24,680
whittashau said:
No, not nowadays. People always like comparing people using a current contemporary name. I hear various footballers being named the new messi etc all the time

Usually young footballers, right?
 
Mar 13, 2009
29,413
3,482
28,180
Netserk said:
The riders who are left are relatively weak (except Nibali ofc) (Nibali would be the only one with a chance to top-5 the Tour).

And when no one defends him, why should everyone mention that he ofc is a doper? I don't think anyone has any doubt about that.

Also note the most important part: Steady progression.

I know a guy who had steady progression right until the point he got suspended. Says absolutely nothing
 
Apr 30, 2011
47,140
29,770
28,180
Dekker_Tifosi said:
I know a guy who had steady progression right until the point he got suspended. Says absolutely nothing
About whether or not they are doping (to a certain degree).

Does say something about the predicted outrage in the clinic though. ;)
 
Aug 31, 2012
7,550
3
0
Dekker_Tifosi said:
I know a guy who had steady progression right until the point he got suspended. Says absolutely nothing

It's more consistent with being clean than a gigantic improvement over a short period of time is.
 
Mar 13, 2009
29,413
3,482
28,180
SeriousSam said:
It's more consistent with being clean than a gigantic improvement over a short period of time is.

not when doping from the start of your career

then you can have a steady progress from year to year and still be doped up to the gills.

not saying nibali is doped however. I somehow believe he is clean
 
Aug 31, 2012
7,550
3
0
Dekker_Tifosi said:
not when doping from the start of your career

then you can have a steady progress from year to year and still be doped up to the gills.

Steady progress is consistent with doping and with being clean,
An absurd leap in performance just with doping.

if someone improves gradually, is that a reason to believe he's clean? No. But if he improves like Froome, it's a strong reason to believe he isn't clean
 
May 15, 2011
45,171
617
24,680
Dekker_Tifosi said:
not when doping from the start of your career

then you can have a steady progress from year to year and still be doped up to the gills.

not saying nibali is doped however. I somehow believe he is clean

Performances like this are impossible when clean.
 
Dec 7, 2010
5,507
0
0
Dekker_Tifosi said:
I somehow believe he is clean

That's the beautiful part of it, really.

All those saps who were putting potentially dangerous PEDs into their system for all those years never realized that they were really just stupid and lazy.

Train harder. Train smarter.

Dominating a GT on home turf is easy if one is simply motivated enough. Luckily for Nibs, his competitors just never got the memo.
 
May 15, 2011
45,171
617
24,680
Netserk said:
Do you believe any of the greats was clean?

Of course not. I'm not stupid. Also, IMO Lemond isn't one of the greats... only the true legends of cycling are greats imo...but that doesn't belong in this thread
 
Oct 16, 2012
10,364
179
22,680
Parrulo said:
What i think its funny is guys like Webvan who are sure Sky is clean just keep making clinic references on the PRR section every time Nibali's name comes up.

Double standards much?

Both are doped to the gills at the moment, but imho its pretty clear who started the arms race

I don't really like Nibali because of his incessant whinging when things aren't going his way (moaning about power metres, lack of respect for him at the tour etc), but he is a great bike rider, who I hope is clean, as I hope (with greater confidence) Sky are.

However if they are both doping (which I don't believe) you could hardly say it is Sky who started the arms race.
 
Apr 4, 2010
2,440
25
11,530
Netserk said:
Even though he has been linked with Ferrari? :confused:

Can you provide a source? I have seen may people are saying this (and I do believe you but) I would like to read it myself! :)
 

OnTheDrops

BANNED
May 16, 2013
59
0
0
It's so difficult to tell. I do remember Nibali getting dropped on every climb at the giro a few years ago, then having to use his descending skills to get back on. But he was still fairly young - it's reasonable to surmise he could legitimately have improved. What's good is we now have two clean yard sticks in the peloton - Garmin and Walsh backed Sky - to judge riders against. Unfortunately due to illness we didn't get the opportunity to make a proper direct comparison to really get a grasp of how believable Nibali's performance has been.
 
Mar 17, 2009
8,421
959
19,680
bottom line is- Yes- Nibbs dopes like every other Pro-rider
Why is his doping not scandalous ala Wiggo, Froome & Porte? Because of his steady progress - Unlike the SKY boys going in a single year from being nobodies to GT contenders/winners. Nibali has had a "credible" development & improvement built over year after year. Plus the nature of his victories aren't of the spectacular caliber of Contador, Porte or Froome- they're more the result & combination of his warrior attitude with the best use of his own abilities/strength

the Ferrari link? Cadel is linked to Ferrari too so...