fasthill said:Good analogy but we're not talking bunch sprints here.
I know, just wanted to drive the point home.
fasthill said:Good analogy but we're not talking bunch sprints here.
fasthill said:Watch? I guess that's where the difference of our views come from. My views, however flawed they might be, come from years of racing for a pay cheque. It was never big but enough to get by (just). Yours, on the other hand, come from watching the action from the comfort of your couch. This, by the way, doesn't make either of us more right or wrong but we're surely see things differently and judging by the number of your posts, care about being right all the time differently as well![]()
I think this is cycling's problem. Different set of perceived values and application of rules, but the rules and the idea of the sport are the same. It's bit crooked.El Pistolero said:That's your problem, you think cycling at a professional level is the same as cycling on your "amateur" level. I can imagine corruption being a little big higher there. After all, I did grow up with Kermis koersen. So I do know the Kermis scene rather well, I know the doping stories there, I know the bribe stories, etc
While all those things exist in professional cycling, it's still different than a kermis koerske.
Really!? You're either pretty strong cyclist or from very hilly area as the last 1,5 km passes as a decent hill in many parts of this planet.El Pistolero said:LBL doesn't have an uphill finish
fasthill said:Watch? I guess that's where the difference of our views come from. My views, however flawed they might be, come from years of racing for a pay cheque. It was never big but enough to get by (just). Yours, on the other hand, come from watching the action from the comfort of your couch. This, by the way, doesn't make either of us more right or wrong but we're surely see things differently and judging by the number of your posts, care about being right all the time differently as well![]()
killswitch said:Don't know where to post it, so ...
Vino's manifesto
I've established myself as a successful athlete. I'm now an athlete with a worldwide reputation and recognition. But my career, as a professional racer, is coming to its end little by little. And I'm already building my new career: I'm a candidate for deputy and the future leader of the " Astana Team".
Of course there are opposition, rivals, and just banal envious. But I know full well that there ...is no way to do without them!
All these scandalous articles about me are a put-up job,otherwise some tabloids or individual journalists want only make their "PR" using the name of a famous person.
All the famous and successful persons, whether in sports, in politics or in business are figuring, from time to time, in the "yellow" articles. This is a part of their lives, pay for success. In my view it's not fair, but there is a perception in the community: if you are not in the "yellow press" - it means you do not succeed.
Regarding to me, I think - that kind of lying, scandalous articles about me will continue to be. But they won't stop me. I'll go ahead and reach new heights.
I would like my fans, the fans of cycling, my friends, colleagues and acquaintances to treat with understanding the various rumors and false articles about me.
I'm mentally prepared for any attacks and provocations from the part of the ill-wishers; and my lawyer are ready to repel them.
http://www.facebook.com/pages/Alexandre-Vinokourov/374951987462?v=wall
So you'd have no problem with say Contador paying off Schleck and Evans to let him win the Tour? How would that be any different from Vino paying Kolobnev to let him win LBL?CobbleStoner said:but stop trying to change it
VeloCity said:So you'd have no problem with say Contador paying off Schleck and Evans to let him win the Tour? How would that be any different from Vino paying Kolobnev to let him win LBL?
Zam_Olyas said:wow! .he could turn out to be a great politician
BroDeal said:Contador doesn't have to pay those two. Evans is not good enough to beat Contador, and Schleck is weak in the head.
SENIOR police will warn Australia's elite sporting bodies today that they are at risk of being infiltrated by organised gambling networks unless administrators take aggressive action to protect their codes.
The warning will be delivered at a forum in Melbourne involving international crime experts and representatives of Australia's leading sports.
...
Several police investigations have revealed crime identities using their personal relationships within sport to glean inside information in order to punt large amounts - usually to launder drug money.
Last month the Australian Crime Commission released a report that said some sporting bodies "lack a comprehensive understanding of the capabilities and impact organised criminal groups can have on their sector''.
VeloCity said:So you'd have no problem with say Contador paying off Schleck and Evans to let him win the Tour? How would that be any different from Vino paying Kolobnev to let him win LBL?
CobbleStoner said:you are misunderstanding what happened/happens in bike racing, (made even more apparent by your analogy)
Vino did not pay Kolb to let him win, he paid him to work like a teammate in the final kilos once they had a small gap.
that happens in racing.
that is not even close to the tour favorite paying off his closest 2 rivals to win a 3 week race, regardless of what is going on in any stage. your premise makes no sense.
El Imbatido said:This should clear a few things up:
ak-zaaf said:He already admitted he put 100k in Kolobnev's account. He just said it was a loan.
Still don't see the problem in buying a race when you're in the lead with 1 other guy though. Happens all the time.
Poursuivant said:Well if it happens all the time it must be ok.