I would love to see Sepp win too (I'm a Durangan; I'm a professor at the same college where Sepp's dad used to teach and I take Nordic lessons from the center where his mom coaches and have my son in the same MTB development program that Sepp came up in as a kid) but this race situation isn't cut and dry to me, no matter my personal preferred outcome.
I agree with the previous poster who mentioned, and I recall this too, that *everybody* was pissed when Froome stayed with Wiggins in 2012, when it was obvious that he was able to ride away. I think that sometimes the difference between the expectation that the competitors should all be selfish steely-eyed killers looking out for numero uno at all costs, or gracious team players who repay debts and yield to courtesy and sensible team strategies, is just a matter of:
1. How well someone regards the particular rider
and/or
2. A contrarian attitude that always considers whatever thing that happened as the thing that should not have happened (and the thing that didn't happen as the thing that should have happened).
I get it. Barring disaster, J-V have 1-2-3 in the bag. Rog and Vin have won six Grand Tours between the two of them, *each* of which was contributed to through the deep, selfless labor of Kuss. Would it be so wrong for two of the most dominant Grand Tour riders on the planet to contribute to the success of the world's greatest superdomestique, who has given so, so much to them? It would be a real fairytale ending to a historic and unprecedented GT season for J-V, when Kuss helped Rog win the Giro, helped Vin win the Tour, and then the three of them went 1-2-3 on the Vuelta podium with Sepp on top. It would be remembered forever. People will remember J-V's dominance this year no matter who from their team wins it, but the fairytale will be a little bit less of a fairytale if Rog or Vin predictably finish on top.
On the other hand, the team did say that their strategy is to try and protect 1-2-3, with the winner being the person who gets to the finish first. There is nothing inherently wrong with that and I don't feel like I can criticize it.
I also agree with the perspective that Vin's race strategy seems to be "ride fast" and I'm similarly not convinced that one can read politics much deeper than that into it.
I agree with the previous poster who mentioned, and I recall this too, that *everybody* was pissed when Froome stayed with Wiggins in 2012, when it was obvious that he was able to ride away. I think that sometimes the difference between the expectation that the competitors should all be selfish steely-eyed killers looking out for numero uno at all costs, or gracious team players who repay debts and yield to courtesy and sensible team strategies, is just a matter of:
1. How well someone regards the particular rider
and/or
2. A contrarian attitude that always considers whatever thing that happened as the thing that should not have happened (and the thing that didn't happen as the thing that should have happened).
I get it. Barring disaster, J-V have 1-2-3 in the bag. Rog and Vin have won six Grand Tours between the two of them, *each* of which was contributed to through the deep, selfless labor of Kuss. Would it be so wrong for two of the most dominant Grand Tour riders on the planet to contribute to the success of the world's greatest superdomestique, who has given so, so much to them? It would be a real fairytale ending to a historic and unprecedented GT season for J-V, when Kuss helped Rog win the Giro, helped Vin win the Tour, and then the three of them went 1-2-3 on the Vuelta podium with Sepp on top. It would be remembered forever. People will remember J-V's dominance this year no matter who from their team wins it, but the fairytale will be a little bit less of a fairytale if Rog or Vin predictably finish on top.
On the other hand, the team did say that their strategy is to try and protect 1-2-3, with the winner being the person who gets to the finish first. There is nothing inherently wrong with that and I don't feel like I can criticize it.
I also agree with the perspective that Vin's race strategy seems to be "ride fast" and I'm similarly not convinced that one can read politics much deeper than that into it.