My brother in law did RAAM years ago and fell asleep twice while riding, luckily no big damage from the subsequent crashes.It always blows my mind that people don't realize what happens to your mind when you go that deep.
The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
My brother in law did RAAM years ago and fell asleep twice while riding, luckily no big damage from the subsequent crashes.It always blows my mind that people don't realize what happens to your mind when you go that deep.
Cuitu Negru is really fun as unipuerto finish on stage 11.
Its not so much fun if it is the stage where you expect the biggest gaps to happen
Good decision for him to lose a lot of time so he can go in break and try to win stages. He's probably not gonna help O'Connor much anyway.Did Gall walk up the climb?
As long as O'Connor has the jersey, that obviously isn't happening.Good decision for him to lose a lot of time so he can go in break and try to win stages. He's probably not gonna help O'Connor much anyway.
You see him jamming up the hill, bike set up for ultimate few kilometers easier ratios put him at an obvious advantage, it's only a grannie gear if you are a granny..He absolutely gained an advantage. Why else would he do it?
No doubt about it. I actually thought about exactly that when it happened: Is he going to use the cars to get back to the peloton again? And that was exactly what he did. Good call to penalize him. If you want to spend time changing your bike, then you'll also have to spend energy reducing the time gap you created.Definatel deserved the penalty, the drafting was blatant, should have had his team mates on the bumper and him behind them
“hi Ben, I’m going in the break to be a defensive satellite rider, sounds good eh?”As long as O'Connor has the jersey, that obviously isn't happening.
Welll put.He deserved the penalty, but I wish that the race judges were more consistent with drafting penalties.
Why not a yellow card instead?This is a fan forum, not the UN. I don't have to answer such questions regarding bias versus non bias. Of course I'm a Rog fan. I mean hello? Meanwhile can you guarentee everyone happy right now with the commissaire decision is an impartial bystander who only cares about "ze rules"? I don't think so.
Bias cuts both way.
They were coming back into the peloton with or without the car draft. That's the context. He swapped bikes immediately after a nature break.
At most they made a mistake using the car to help him back in, especially considering the punishment for their 'crime'.
But let's not pretend the car draft was decisive. It wasn't. Without the car he was still getting right back into his spot in the bunch without sticking his nose in the wind on the wheels of his teammates (aka teammates who dropped as soon as the climb got serious anyway so they were of no further use in the stage & did not influence anything).
That does nothing, so you only get them when you cause a crash.Why not a yellow card instead?
Bora created the problem by:No doubt about it. I actually thought about exactly that when it happened: Is he going to use the cars to get back to the peloton again? And that was exactly what he did. Good call to penalize him. If you want to spend time changing your bike, then you'll also have to spend energy reducing the time gap you created.
Juaristi is heavier looking than I would have imagined...
Gained no advantage???????????Because he gained no advantage? I mean WTF. He was in the peloton safely, swapped safely and then returned safely.
If GC is decided by this penalty (which I don't think it will be) then sh*t.
Totally.Was kind of stupid plan, even with the bit of drafting the team car, he still had to ride pretty hard just to get back to the peloton 2 km before the climb started. Strange decision but Bora has made many strange ones in this race.
No circles. Just one clueless dude making a ridiculous argumentI mean... this conversation is going round in circles here.
tact is politeness. How is this even part of the conversation here.I'll play ball for a second but tact refers to context. If Rog had been caught in a split & drafted to get back on, then fine, yes. But that's not what happened. It's not the first time this season there's been an overly zealous decision by the commissaires either. Josh Tarling's own misadventure in Paris-Roubaix springs to mind.
I mean look, everyone can hide behind the almighty 'rule book' as much as they want but we all know it's enforced (at best) inconsistently & mostly not at all.
So yeah, great job 'commissaires' *clap clap here's your applause*... although I'd hazard a guess on Tuesday everything will be back to business as usual & no one will get punished for the usual 'transgressions' which occur at every point of a normal road race stage in cycling.
How are you comparing this with Sticky Bottles??????They should be applied consistently across the board or not at all. Especially for something so trivial which didn't violate the fairness of proceedings.
But don't mess with GC one week from Madrid on a technicality. Not when (as I've said a billion times already) sticky bottles, irregular behavior in the bunch and all that cr*p goes completely unpunished everywhere.
Absolutely no one applauding this decision this evening can say with a straight face the rules are enforced equally every day in this Grand Tour no matter the rider or the infringement. It just doesn't happen.