Jonas wanted to drop Ciccone but he couldn't. This is what I saw.He was but I'm not sure how much effort Vingegaard but into that. It was a bit of a nothing climb
Jonas wanted to drop Ciccone but he couldn't. This is what I saw.He was but I'm not sure how much effort Vingegaard but into that. It was a bit of a nothing climb
You saw badly. The climbs was 6-7% by that point and dropping Ciccone would have been so useless. Vingegaard went to set a pace at the front but it's shallow – see the fact Almeida dragged around 15 riders up with him.Jonas wanted to drop Ciccone but he couldn't. This is what I saw.
Harper/Dunbar are no better than Vine, Kuss is a domestique, Fortunato is way better than Higuita and Poels, and Meintjes and Howson is just... what? It's not 2019.
What this really sounds like is wanting a Jayco rider or ex rider in the break.
Exactly what happened then Almeida reeled them back in. Anyone who watched knows that's not hard to figure out. Of course, fanboys will make themselves believe whatever they wish to be true for whatever reason, but it's not hard to see what happened for anyone actually watching.Jonas wanted to drop Ciccone but he couldn't. This is what I saw.
Pretty sure Jay Vine was in that Beastie Boys video for Sabotage.
You said that this was a weak break, but then you didn't mention any riders stronger than the guys actually in the break. That's the confusion.I am not saying they are better they are Vine, but these riders can only win from a break, so there is no point staying in the peleton. I'll also add that the DS's would want their riders in the break. Anyway, Vine is becoming smarter in the way he approaches stage races and is reaping the results.
Vingegaard clearly didn't attack, and what sense is there to drop Ciccone in a shallow climb? Like just logically – Ciccone isn't an actual GC threat, and you would gain much more time working together. Why would Jonas have tried to do that?Exactly what happened then Almeida reeled them back in. Anyone who watched knows that's not hard to figure out. Of course, fanboys will make themselves believe whatever they wish to be true for whatever reason, but it's not hard to see what happened for anyone actually watching.
Six stages in and we're still waiting for the first real attack...
This was the most 2009 Tour de France stage I've seen in 16 years.You saw badly. The climbs was 6-7% by that point and dropping Ciccone would have been so useless. Vingegaard went to set a pace at the front but it's shallow – see the fact Almeida dragged around 15 riders up with him.
A bad climb and a bad stage, don't think it reveals much other than Almedia/Ciccone/Vingegaard are the best here.
But others behind are? So if hes ahead it makes no sense to push on to gain time now is that what were going with?Vingegaard clearly didn't attack, and what sense is there to drop Ciccone in a shallow climb? Like just logically – Ciccone isn't an actual GC threat, and you would gain much more time working together. Why would Jonas have tried to do that?
One of the good things about this forum is that it convinces me that I'm not as over-critical about things as I feared. Some cycling fans are much more negative.A bad climb and a bad stage
Agree. Today's stage was quite enjoyable.One of the good thing about this forum is that it convinces me that I'm not as over-critical about things as I feared. Some cycling fans are much more negative.