My Friend Kevin. Has his own custom shop http://www.crypticcycles.com/
He's very talented.
The frame is a 56 cm weighs 660grms
He's very talented.
The frame is a 56 cm weighs 660grms
The Cycling News forum is looking to add some volunteer moderators with Red Rick's recent retirement. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
King Boonen said:
I like that Ray, I like that a lot. MUCH nicer than all this aero rubbish.
42x16ss said:LolBustedknuckle said:42x16ss said:The new Fuji SL 1.1
4.96kg as pictured:
Ride magazine liked it:
http://www.ridemedia.com.au/features/bike-test-04-ride-70-fuji/
The scariest thing is that there's no really unusual components, just high end stuff.
What no etap? No discs?-fail
Add Dura Ace or Record instead of SRAM, some bottle holders, wheels that can be trued and a computer (if you use them) and it's still well and truly under 6 kgs
I kind of get that, but it just doesn't rate highly on what I want from a bike ride. I have got some carbon forks in the post for my fixed wheel, but they were free.ray j willings said:I tell ya KB, you cannot beat heading skyward on a light bike. You will feel like you have gears in hand. For me I just can't ride anything " normal weight" Mind you if I was a pure sprinter t would be different.
King Boonen said:I kind of get that, but it just doesn't rate highly on what I want from a bike ride. I have got some carbon forks in the post for my fixed wheel, but they were free.ray j willings said:I tell ya KB, you cannot beat heading skyward on a light bike. You will feel like you have gears in hand. For me I just can't ride anything " normal weight" Mind you if I was a pure sprinter t would be different.
ray j willings said:King Boonen said:I kind of get that, but it just doesn't rate highly on what I want from a bike ride. I have got some carbon forks in the post for my fixed wheel, but they were free.ray j willings said:I tell ya KB, you cannot beat heading skyward on a light bike. You will feel like you have gears in hand. For me I just can't ride anything " normal weight" Mind you if I was a pure sprinter t would be different.
You should give us a review of the forks on you bike. Be interesting comparison.
King Boonen said:ray j willings said:King Boonen said:I kind of get that, but it just doesn't rate highly on what I want from a bike ride. I have got some carbon forks in the post for my fixed wheel, but they were free.ray j willings said:I tell ya KB, you cannot beat heading skyward on a light bike. You will feel like you have gears in hand. For me I just can't ride anything " normal weight" Mind you if I was a pure sprinter t would be different.
You should give us a review of the forks on you bike. Be interesting comparison.
Planning to fella They're 2007 Trek/Bontrager forks, aluminium steerer and dropouts, carbon legs. Guessing they'll drop about 0.5-1 kg in weight from the bike. From what I can find the rake is the same (They're basically the same era as my Fillmore which is a 2008) so should be a very good comparison. As they're nearly 10 years old the likelihood is if I like the weight reduction I'll sell them on very cheap and pick up some Columbus Tusks or something if they fit. Main worry is my headset, there is an external band that might be an issue but we shall see!
Think I might have lucked out on these, they look very, very nice:ray j willings said:The original bontrager carbon forks [2003/4] on my Trek were very good. The only headset issue with the Trek was the lower headset bearing, it was built into the frame "supposed to lose weight" I hammered the whole thing out so I could fit normal bearings much better. I would imagine your forks being a later model would be better than mine. Bontrager/Trek make some pretty nice stuff.