Morbius said:So is the concensus amoung those who think Wiggins dopes, that he was clean while a trackie with BC (and CA) but started doping with Garmin?
he was always dopinjg, but if you mean, to ramp up the program to the equivalent of others, yeah, i agree.BroDeal said:2009 after Paris-Nice. Wiggins targeted the time trial, thinking it was perfect for him as reigning Olympic champion. He was beaten by Contador and was literally crying about it. I think that is the point when he snapped and decided to do what everyone else was doing.
nah, always was doping. Even when he sets the WR in Colombia at altitude in the jnr 3km IP at the worlds.BroDeal said:Pretty much. Track is a small pond with no depth. All the talented guys are making money on the road. Before Garmin he never placed in the top 100 of the Tour.
I do not think there is much doubt that Contador, Schleck, and Armstrong were all doping in 2009. The idea that Wiggins finally, after years of being paid to race on the road, decided he would get serious at the Tour and found he could hold his own against those three is ludicrous.
blackcat said:nah, always was doping. Even when he sets the WR in Colombia at altitude in the jnr 3km IP at the worlds.
But just a soft program. So when he was at Linda Mac, he did a soft program too. Even in the 3 months he was on the team with Spencer Smith when they were still viable/liquid/financial
RownhamHill said:The Hitch, I know you don't like Wiggins and so on, but I'm interested in this bullying of Landis, as I've seen you mention this before, and what form did it actually take?
I've seen that quote where he says about how he 'knows people who Landis has been phoning up drunk, so you've got wonder about his credibility' (and in which he also goes on to say, 'but maybe that's all borne out of frustration, so you never know', though that bit doesn't often get quoted around here), but is there any other substance to his bullying? And didn't Landis publicly accuse Wiggins of cheating in 2009, before the quote above?
Don't want to particularly argue with you about this, as I know you're clear in your own view, I just want to check what the underlying evidence is!
I think you have to question Landis’ credibility because he lied under oath before and the stories that you hear about him drinking and things like that and you know, [making] telephone calls to people I know, threatening them with things, you just think that the guy appears to not all be there. So when you see these kinds of claims in the press you have to question his credibility because it’s almost like it’s coming from a mad man, but at the same time maybe that’s all borne out of frustration and things.
You just never know but you just look at the way his life has gone over the last five years and you think there’s one person who it would have been so easy to have just admitted it when it happened in 2006, come clean if he did do it and he would have been back racing in a professional team making pretty good money. It’s quite sad how his life has gone away, just dwindled away and now there’s all these claims and counter claims and it’s quite a sad story for him.
was being a little facetious invoking the ponytailed versace shirt wearing triathlete.SundayRider said:Why do you think this? And do you mean Spencer Smith the triathlete?
blackcat said:was being a little facetious invoking the ponytailed versace shirt wearing triathlete.
why? I think the culture was endemic. And i was given heads up also on Wiggo.
And whinging about Moreno or whoever the Italian rider on Cofidis was popped, and whinging about Vino when he won the tt, then is popped, it is a little much to take.
He is a phenomenal rider, no doubt. But leave the doping talk at the door. You dont wish for people to make value judgements on doping, well dont perpetuate these value judgements. Doping inandofitself is not my concern, by gees, just leave the hypocrisy at the door, and dont throw others under the bus. Like Millar when he was in the Toulouse cell, and DB was there and supported him, well, dont throw the colleagues and associates under the bus. This is the Armstrong behaviour 99.9% of the board rail against.
blackcat said:Like Millar when he was in the Toulouse cell, and DB was there and supported him.
Wallace and Gromit said:I often wonder about the significance of DB being with Millar when the Gendarmes came a-knocking. Complicity in some mega-doping scheme, or sounding him out about the upcoming Athens OGs, when Millar would have been a major contender in the ITT?
roundabout said:If you got to the never know bit, might as well post the full quote
Nope, still pathetic.
Doubly pathetic when combined with the quotes on Armstrong from the same article
http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/wiggins-calls-for-biological-passport-data-to-be-made-public
roundabout said:And I think Wiggins started it first with the "bitter drunk" inference. Floyd just put him in his place.
roundabout said:Doubly pathetic when combined with the quotes on Armstrong from the same article
I'd be prepared to give DB benefit on just planning out the next 12-18 months of their major races schedule for the national team, be it worlds or olympics. I doubt brailsford would have bothered with getting his hand in the cookie jar.Wallace and Gromit said:I often wonder about the significance of DB being with Millar when the Gendarmes came a-knocking. Complicity in some mega-doping scheme, or sounding him out about the upcoming Athens OGs, when Millar would have been a major contender in the ITT?
is that his ex-wife?Catwhoorg said:DB pregnant wife was also at the table.
Hardly a likely companion for deep doping talk.
blackcat said:is that his ex-wife?
Has he not shacked up/married to Fran Millar?
BroDeal said:Triply pathetic when combined with the fact that Wiggins rode on a team filled with ex-Postal riders who told him that Armstrong was doping. He knew Landis was telling the truth and chose to publicly cast doubt on Landis.
SundayRider said:I'm sure he knew that Armstrong was doping before he joined Garmin.
Benotti69 said:Anyone with half a brain who was watching the TdF in '99 knew that Armstrong was doping!!!
I mean the dope bust in '98 should've been a big hint.
BroDeal said:There are still lots of people with half a brain or less. Many post here. The same sort of saps who believed in Armstrong then believe in Sky now.
DimSpace / SkyCyclingFanBYOP88 said:And don't forget the ones who were against Armstrong but strangely believe in Sky.
BroDeal said:There are still lots of people with half a brain or less. Many post here. The same sort of saps who believed in Armstrong then believe in Sky now.
BYOP88 said:And don't forget the ones who were against Armstrong but strangely believe in Sky.
BYOP88 said:And don't forget the ones who were against Armstrong but strangely believe in Sky.
There are a number of errors in the above quote.blackcat said:... Even when he sets the WR in Colombia at altitude in the jnr 3km IP at the worlds....
