doolols said:
What Wiggins does, and what Wiggins says, are usually approximately 180 degrees apart. You really don't want to believe anything he says in an interview, especially when it comes to training / weight regimes.
If that was true there would be some record of people saying you can't trust Wiggins before 2012. There wasn't. His fans considered him one of the most intelligent and honest riders in the peloton.
It was only when people on here began to quote Wiggins on his newfound support for dopers and omerta, that his fanboys came up with this dishonest idea that Wiggins doesnt know what he's talking about, has no control over his thoughts and needs to be treated like he was special needs.
.bull****. Wiggins is a grown highly functioning man who knows perfectly well what is going on and he says what he wants to say. He was very consistent on his opinions of doping before his transformation and very consistent on his opinions since then. Away from cycling he's proven himself perfectly capable of handling interviews and discussing other topics.it's such a cheap pathetic line of argument and one likely admired by the trolls from the Armstrong days like Polish, BPC, Mambo 95 who wish they had thought of it.
When allegedly clean tdf winners who claim to represent the vanguard of the fight against doping, contradict themselves from month to month on questions such as their disease or their training approach, those are legitimate reasons for suspicions, and most sky fans would in other walks of life aknowledge that.
But here, they are so commited to the defense of this cycling team they have to pretend like for them, words actually carry no meaning.