the sceptic said:it seems impossible to me
Did look at you the site you posted? Watch any of the race?
The Cycling News forum is looking to add some volunteer moderators with Red Rick's recent retirement. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
the sceptic said:it seems impossible to me
Race Radio said:please, take some time to look at a map and read what was actually written instead of what some obsessed troll writes.
Thanks
Race Radio said:Yes, I do think having a tailwind for the majority of the climb, and the run in to Bedoin, does effect how fresh the riders are in the last 5km. Not sure why anyone would think that it didn't.
Race Radio said:Did look at you the site you posted? Watch any of the race?
the sceptic said:I have looked at everything, but I dont see any evidence that backs up your 80% tailwind story. With the wind coming from the north, it just isnt possible.
Perhaps you made an error in your calculations again?
SeriousSam said:The main protagonists have yet to converge on a consensus on whether Froome had private tailwind following him all the way up.
Race Radio said:So the wind was coming from the North now? Did you read the link you posted that had it coming from the west?
Perhaps you did not read your own links again?
the sceptic said:To me it looks like north-west. If you would also read the posts I quoted by John Swanson he seems to think the wind came from the north that day.
So again it does appear to be difficult to get a 80% tailwind from that, unless the wind is moving in many different directions and following Froome around.
RownhamHill said:Please just stop now.
yespatterns said:Holy ****. This thread....It's a zombie! KILL IT WITH FIRE.
the sceptic said:huh? If you disagree with my post feel free to post your own view.
this, 10 chars.Netserk said:You are aware that if you don't like or don't want to discuss the topic, you are free to ignore it and not open the thread?
Netserk said:You are aware that if you don't like or don't want to discuss the topic, you are free to ignore it and not open the thread?
RownhamHill said:Yeah it's a very fair point, and I didn't articulate myself well in that last post.
I was interested in reading the discussion/topic in general terms. It's just it appeared to me to degenerating into a tomato/tomayto type discussion, which doesn't do anyone any favours. What I meant is I have no interest in making a judgement on whether the wind was coming from the West or the North, but it's pretty clear what Sceptic and Race Radio's views are, and they don't need to go on arguing the toss about it.
Anyway, I'm now probably just as guilty of another tedious discussion so I'll bow out at this point.
the sceptic said:It appears the wind was coming from all directions at once
Do you honestly think Ferminal created this thread with the purpose to troll? Really?Race Radio said:Ahhh, this explains why with every post you change your position.
This thread needs to die. It started off as way to troll and it continues as one
Race Radio said:Ahhh, this explains why with every post you change your position.
This thread needs to die. It started off as way to troll and it continues as one
the sceptic said:But you seemed to agree that the wind came from the north/west? Even though earlier in the thread you wrote it came from the opposite direction.
Netserk said:Do you honestly think Ferminal created this thread with the purpose to troll? Really?
Race Radio said:Do you really think the various folks who intentionally twisted what I wrote were not intending to troll? Really?
Netserk said:Did they start the thread?